![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I wonder if this infobox could be renamed? We have a specific guideline (WP:TERRORIST) against using the word 'terrorist' to describe organizations (except as the sourced opinion of others). While the title is not visible to users, using this infobox looks like a POV statement to other editors of the article. See, for example, the low-level edit warring at ETA switching between this and Template:Infobox War Faction, which is not a good fit for the organization. I suggest Template:Infobox militant organization. Any objections? TSP 19:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
A user was complaining that the description "Crimes" was POV, and he does kinda have a point since it's not wikipedia's duty to decide what's crime and what's not. Can we also reword that? I don't really have anything in mind though... Something more neutral like "acts" would do it. Regards, Kerem Özcan (talk) 16:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yes, Kerem, Im agree with you in theory, but anyways we cant call for example a killing of 10000 inhabitants of a town or village an "activity" or even an "attack". There're events classified by the international organizations, nations or courts as crimes. An example, the killings of pupils in Beslan school. Or the destroying of Budha monument by Al-Qaeda: I dont know if even the supporters (if they exist) can call these events "an activity" or "a (political) act". We can call these tragedies crimes until no any user is opposing us. Andranikpasha (talk) 23:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
This infobox is currently being used on Haqqani network, but we realized that users are using parameters that don't exist in the template and therefore do not display on the article. Could we add "Opponents" and/or "Allies" to the infobox?--RDavi404 (talk) 17:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
I think it's necessary.Fire and Ice (talk) 05:24, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Would anyone object if a "Rivals" field was added, in the general area of the "Allies" and "Opponents" fields? Quite often you get similar organisations with the same opponents who engage in occasional, or even frequent, feuding with each other. I occasionally have to revert the addition of these organisations to "Opponents" as it's misleading to list them alongside genuine opponents. FDW777 (talk) 11:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Template:Infobox political party has a parameter for slogans and that doesn't appear to be the case here. Why is that? Militant organizations often have slogans too. Charles Essie (talk) 04:40, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Infobox terrorist organization and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 31 § Template:Infobox terrorist organization until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 00:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Would it be ok to add a colorcode parameter like the one in {{Infobox political party}} to use with the official color of a militant organization, if there is one? MarioGom (talk) 21:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
i dont know how to crate one Jabhatansaralsham (talk) 01:29, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
What is the flag param used for? Do I just plop a Template:flagicon in it? When I put the bare file name it doesn't seem to do anything. Maybe we can add modify the documentation to add instructions or an example toobigtokale (talk) 01:02, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Some militant organizations have anthems. Should that be included as a parameter? Charles Essie (talk) 17:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply