Civic Cat

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of songs about London, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically revertedbyClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of songs about London was changedbyCivic Cat (u) (t) deleting 11107 characters on 2009-11-03T21:15:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've responded to your query on the help desk here. If you have more questions don't hesitate to ask. James086^{Talk | Email} 18:48, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of songs about cities has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://lyrics.wikia.com/Martha_And_The_Muffins:Saigon (matching the regex rule \bwikia\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:2010 Haiti earthquake for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Pontificalibus (talk) 23:16, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I see the discussion was removed. I was going to respond with:

Yes, the Bois Caiman meeting was a vodou ritual, but linking that to Satanism takes much more manuevering than linking it to Catholicism. Vodou has Catholic roots, as does Santeria, and other variations that are deemed much more acceptable. Sure, voduo evolved from pagan roots, the same can be said of Christianity. Its a literary theme, from ancient German, Washington Irving, O Brother, Where Art Thou?. Of course, to buy it, you have to believe in the Devil, and if so, it's no less odd than believing God had an agreement with the Jews. Grsz¹¹ 23:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 20:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Further to our conversation on my talk page, there is advice at WP:Lists and WP:Stand-alone lists. regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:10, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The fact that it's a sublist is not a reason for removing the categories. If it exists as an independent title in articlespace, then it has to be directly filed in at least one category in its own right, as no page in articlespace can ever be left uncategorized. Bearcat (talk) 01:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Operation Payback are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Neo139 (talk) 17:40, 10 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Isthis edit somehow a comment on the discussion at Talk:List of music videos featuring barefoot females? If it is, I must tell you that it's not a good idea to edit just to make a point. Please see Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point.Sjö (talk) 05:49, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

No. I was lead to the page by the link I got and thought I'd add to it. No disruption intended, nor I think caused; and no point to make in regards to the list I posted. If anything, it was more of a humourous self-deprecation. Also keep in mind that I put it in the talk page--where I understand greater latitude is permitted, rather than the article.Civic Cat (talk) 14:39, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'll give the meta article a better reading, though in a cursory examination, I see nothing that indicates I made a disruption.Civic Cat (talk) 14:42, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

OK. Maybe I'm just a bit touchy.Sjö (talk) 20:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Per the discussion here, "You're" is a contraction of "You are" (just like "He's/He is" or "We're/We are"). This isn't the same as "Your", which indicates possession. "You're user pages" means "You are user pages" which probably isn't what you meant. It's just unfortunate that "You're" and "Your" sound just the same: there wouldn't be the same confusion with, say, "He's user pages" and "His user pages". Cheers, Tonywalton ^Talk 01:20, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

There's a problem you could resolve easily on the disussion about an AfD nomination of phase_(band). Thank you whatever your descision may be... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asouko (talk • contribs) 12:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply