Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





Newtatoryd222


Joined 27 October 2023
 


User page  

Talk  



Watch  

View history  

Contributions  

Edit  


 

Languages  

What links here  

User logs  

View user groups  

Permanent link  

Page information  

Edit full page  

Download QR code  





Latest comment: 1 hour ago by Garsh2 in topic Your submission at Articles for creation: Mellowship Slinky in B Major (June 29)
 


Learn more about this page

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keep Passing the Open Windows (November 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
  • reliable
  • secondary
  • independent of the subject
  • Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Theroadislong (talk) 09:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
     

    Hello, Newtatoryd222! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Keep Passing the Open Windows (November 4)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
    This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the draft talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. If the subject satisfies general notability, please also indicate on the draft talk page or in AFC comments when resubmitting.

    You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteriaatthe Teahouse.

    This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

    You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

    If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

    The sources are not independent sources. Has the song charted? Has the song been reviewed? Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Robert McClenon (talk) 13:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Keep Passing the Open Windows (November 5)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Fails WP:NSONG, requires significant coverage about the song.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Dan arndt (talk) 01:25, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Video Games (Tenacious D song) (November 8)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Kilaseell - Message me! - 19:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Video Games (Tenacious D song) (November 8)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Needs more independent, significant sourcing.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:54, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Video Games (Tenacious D song) (November 8)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
  • reliable
  • secondary
  • independent of the subject
  • Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:59, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Video Games (Tenacious D song) (November 8)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ARandomName123 was:
  • reliable
  • secondary
  • independent of the subject
  • Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.  The comment the reviewer left was:
    Instagram, Tidal and Laughing Squid don't count towards notability because they are either: not independent, provide no significant coverage or a blog.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 22:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Video Games (Tenacious D song) (November 8)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    At present, this article doesn't pass Wikipedia's notability guidelines for music. Of the four sources, two are primary sources (i.e., Instagram and Tidal) and another source only shows routine coverage (i.e., Laughing Squid). Please provide more reliable, secondary sources with significant coverage to show this subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Video Games (Tenacious D song) (November 8)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    X, Instgram or Facebook are not good sources.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Kilaseell - Message me! - 22:54, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Video Games (Tenacious D song) (November 8)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Facebook, X (Twitter) and Instagram are not reliable sources.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:54, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    November 2023

    edit

      Hello, I'm ResolutionsPerMinute. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fell in Love with a Girl, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 00:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


      Hi Newtatoryd222! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of I'm in Love with My Car several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

    All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:I'm in Love with My Car, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 15:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Bogey Music (November 10)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:
  • reliable
  • secondary
  • independent of the subject
  • Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Drmies (talk) 01:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Bogey Music (November 10)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:
  • reliable
  • secondary
  • independent of the subject
  • Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Tails Wx 02:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Canadian Idiot personnel

    edit

    Hi. In this edit you added the personnel for the studio recording of the Weird Al song Canadian Idiot. I did not see where the information was available at the provided source, Tidal. Is there some sort of hidden link or mouse-over? Also, these are the regular members of his band since his first album, I don't know if it's worth mentioning if sources discussing the song don't mention them (ie: it can be assumed). (These issues of verification and importance of inclusion may apply to the edits you made to several other song articles over a period of a few hours.) – Reidgreg (talk) 14:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Tidal is an app. So you need the app to see the personnel that i have referenced on the personnel that i have contributed. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 15:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Oh, and also he has guest musicians on his songs. So the personnel can be different at times. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 15:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Then go to the album that has the song and click on credits. Then find the song and press the down arrow (it depends on what device you’re using) and then you’ll find the credits/personnel. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 15:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    I could see that if there were guest musicians, but there don't seem to be any for this recording.
    Sourcing an app seems problematic to me, as content may change quickly without notice and it can't really be archived. In the Tidal terms of service point 15 paragraph 2 states:

    TIDAL makes no warranties or representations about the TIDAL Service or Service Content, including but not limited to their accuracy, reliability, completeness, efficacy, or timeliness. TIDAL shall not be subject to liability for truth, accuracy, or completeness of any information conveyed to the user or for errors, mistakes or omissions therein or for any delays or interruptions of the data or information stream from whatever cause. You agree that your use the TIDAL Service and the Service Content is at your own risk. It is your responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any opinion, advice or other Service Content available through the TIDAL Service.

    This is pretty typical of apps. I found something similar when evaluating the use of Google Maps as a source. Basically, if the publisher has a disclaimer about the accuracy and truthfulness of their information and to "use at your own risk", then we shouldn't treat it as a reliable source. At the bottom fo the Tidal pages it says Tidal is a fan-centered music platform. For a reliable source, we should ideally look for something that is research-centered.
    The sources used in Canadian Idiot at the time of its good article review were vetted and found to be reliable and to verify the article content. The addition of a non-reliable source could cause the article to lose its good article status. So I'd like to ask you to revert your edit to the article and remove the Personnel section. Thanks. – Reidgreg (talk) 14:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    I don’t know how to the mobile website. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 19:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    And also. If that were the case. The the personnel for Message In A Bottle shouldn’t be there. Unless I’m wrong. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 19:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Oh, and also this Newtatoryd222 (talk) 03:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    One more thing. If you go to Liner notes and scroll down to metadata in the contents section. There is a sentence that talk about Tidal. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 03:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    I don't feel there are many articles where it would be justifiable. Message in a Bottle (The Police song) is only a Start-class article so it's not a good example. The sentence in Liner notes is sourced to Tidal.com rather than an independent source. Reliability aside (not that that isn't a huge issue) this seems awfully promotional to me: it isn't providing any new information which couldn't be assumed or found in the parent article (the album the song is found on), while it is mentioning Tidal in-text, linked, and the reference points to their website. It's also a bit of a concern to me when I see such edits to several articles in a short period of time, and Tidal.com has shown up on link reports at Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam. – Reidgreg (talk) 14:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Keep Passing the Open Windows (November 10)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Still fails WP:NSONG. Adding Youtube links to the demo and extended versions does not contribute to passing WP:NSONG.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Hey man im josh (talk) 15:46, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Keep Passing the Open Windows (November 10)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Rich Smith was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This had now been submitted 6 times, with no real improvement per the comments left be other reviewers. Continuous additions of irrelevant or non-reliable sources.
    - RichT|C|E-Mail 17:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: The World Has Turned And Left Me Here (song) (November 11)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Not enough significant coversge listed
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:13, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: The World Has Turned And Left Me Here (song) (November 11)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
    This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Fails WP:NSONG, lacks any reliable secondary sources.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Dan arndt (talk) 02:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: The World Has Turned And Left Me Here (song) (November 11)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tails Wx were:
    This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Several sections also lack citations, please cite references!
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Tails Wx 03:22, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: The World Has Turned And Left Me Here (song) (November 11)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
    You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    edit

      Hello Newtatoryd222! Your additions to Draft:The World Has Turned And Left Me Here (song) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

    It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:40, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: The World Has Turned And Left Me Here (song) (November 11)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Still fails WP:NSONG - Weezerpedia, Tidal, Genius, Last.fm and Spotify are not acceptable or reliable sources.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Dan arndt (talk) 08:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Gone Troppo (song) (November 11)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Though this song may be notable, this article does not presently indicate that it meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for music. One of the sources (i.e., Discogs is an unreliable source. Otherwise, most of this article is unsourced.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:58, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: The Check’s In the Mail (November 12)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:44, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Blood from a Clome (November 13)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Hey man im josh (talk) 16:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Mellowship Slinky in B Major (November 14)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    KylieTastic (talk) 22:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Mellowship Slinky in B Major (November 14)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 22:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Mellowship Slinky in B Major (November 14)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    KylieTastic (talk) 23:17, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Mellowship Slinky in B Major (November 16)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

    You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

    If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.


    This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the draft talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. If the subject satisfies general notability, please also indicate on the draft talk page or in AFC comments when resubmitting.

    You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteriaatthe Teahouse.

    Please ask for advice at the Teahouse or a music WikiProject before resubmitting. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Robert McClenon (talk) 06:34, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Mellowship Slinky in B Major (November 16)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 16:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: One More Minute (“Weird Al” Yankovic song) (November 17)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Master Exploder (November 17)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 06:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Twentieth Century Fox (song) (November 18)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
  • reliable
  • secondary
  • independent of the subject
  • Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.  The comment the reviewer left was:
    Wikipedia subjects need in-depth coverage (full-length articles, not just passing mentions) in usually at least 3 reliable sources that are not written by or affiliated with the subject.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 06:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Find My Way (Paul McCartney Song) (November 18)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
    You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:15, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Bogey Music (November 18)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    The article requires proper grammar and suitable referencing from reliable sources to be accepted.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Utopes (talk / cont) 08:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Find My Way (Paul McCartney Song) (November 18)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Most of the information in the article is currently unsourced, and inline citations to reliable and secondary sources should be added to back up unreferenced information and establish notability per WP:NSONG.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Creatures (For A While) (November 18)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    2 questions, 1. How do I add the charts? 2. How may I improve my Creatures (For A While) article draft? Newtatoryd222 (talk) 23:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    And before you ask, it was released as the lead single from the Evolver album. And it is by 311. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 23:07, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Non-free rationale for File:Hey Jude.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hey Jude.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

    If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 23:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Non-free rationale for File:Creatures For A While.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Creatures For A While.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

    If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 23:08, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Non-free rationale for File:New Duck.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:New Duck.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

    If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 23:09, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Non-free rationale for File:MJ Billie Jean.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MJ Billie Jean.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

    If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 23:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Non-free rationale for File:Liar by Queen.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Liar by Queen.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

    If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 23:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    How do I add a rationale on the mobile web? Newtatoryd222 (talk) 23:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    I don’t know how. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 23:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: First World Problems (song) (November 19)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Fails the requirements of WP:NSONG.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Dan arndt (talk) 07:27, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:Creatures For A While.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Creatures For A While.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:34, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    I’m trying to make an article for the song. So I need it there. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 14:36, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Twentieth Century Fox (song) (November 20)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 04:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Replaceable non-free use File:Dave Bickler.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Dave Bickler.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

    1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
    2. Onthe file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

    Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

    If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

    This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Wrack My Brain (November 20)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
    This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    KylieTastic (talk) 14:53, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:Dave Bickler in the music video for Eye of the Tiger.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Dave Bickler in the music video for Eye of the Tiger.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:Dave Bickler.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Dave Bickler.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: King Of Suede (November 22)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TechnoSquirrel69 were:
    This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Thanks for your submission! I'm declining this draft for now as there simply are not enough citations to establish notability, and it hasn't been shown that this work has satisfied any of the other specific notability criteria for albums. Also, Discogs is not a reliable source, and I'd recommend that you remove citations to it. Let me know if you have any questions!
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:I’m in love with my car.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:I’m in love with my car.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:Wrack My Brain.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Wrack My Brain.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: This is the Life (November 23)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 03:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:King of Suede.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:King of Suede.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:MJ Billie Jean.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:MJ Billie Jean.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    I was going to add the files, but I can’t because 1. The drafts aren’t articles yet. 2. Someone reverted my Billie Jean edit. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 18:28, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    And also. When I do put some of the images in the drafts, they get removed. Newtatoryd222 (talk) 18:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:Don’t Let The Sun Go Down On Me.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Don’t Let The Sun Go Down On Me.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    edit
     
    File Copyright problem

    Thanks for uploading File:View Monster.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

    If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

    Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

    Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Blood from a Clone (November 26)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Can you try to source more of this?
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    BuySomeApples (talk) 00:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Rock It (Prime Jive) (November 26)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Fails WP:NSONG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Dan arndt (talk) 01:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Blood from a Clone (November 26)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xegma was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Xegma(talk) 08:44, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    AfC notification: Draft:Blood from a Clone has a new comment

    edit

     
    I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Blood from a Clone. Thanks! Xegma(talk) 08:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Blood from a Clone (November 27)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Ratnahastin (talk) 14:13, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:One More Minute.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:One More Minute.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:This is the Life.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:This is the Life.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:LALD.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:LALD.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Territorial Pissings (November 29)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Does not appear to pass WP:NSONG.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Hey man im josh (talk) 13:24, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Blood from a Clone (November 29)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Thank you for working on this! It still needs a little work to read more like an encyclopedia article, it's a little informal right now. Also, the article should clearly demonstrate how the song meets WP:NSONG.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    BuySomeApples (talk) 13:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Find My Way (Paul McCartney song) has been accepted

    edit
     
    Find My Way (Paul McCartney song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

    Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

    The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

    Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

    If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

    If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

    Thanks again, and happy editing!

    Utopes (talk / cont) 18:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Dress Me Up As A Robber (December 3)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    At present, this article doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for songs. The song may be notable if it has "been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." At present, this article relies on two sources, one of which is a primary source.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:29, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: One More Minute (“Weird Al” Yankovic song) (December 3)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    KylieTastic (talk) 19:11, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Rock It (Prime Jive) (December 4)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Fails WP:NSONG - details could be included in "Need Your Loving Tonight", as the single's B-side. Noting that "Need Your Loving Tonight" was not one of the band's bestselling hits, as it only reached #44 on the Billboard Hot 100.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Dan arndt (talk) 06:20, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    AfC notification: Draft:First World Problems (song) has a new comment

    edit

     
    I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:First World Problems (song). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Mellowship Slinky in B Major (December 7)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    BuySomeApples (talk) 19:42, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: First World Problems (song) has been accepted

    edit
     
    First World Problems (song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

    Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

    Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

    If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

    If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

    Thanks again, and happy editing!

    Toadette (Happy holiday!) 10:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Blood from a Clone (December 8)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    The casual language has still not been replaced with formal language. The article will keep getting declined until this is fixed.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:46, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:Hey Jude.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Hey Jude.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    dab

    edit

    You asked how to make a disambiguation page (dab). You can just create it in Main space, put the dab name in square brackets, preview, click on the red link and start. As it doesn't need references, you can't go too wrong. Let me know if you have problems. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:58, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Creatures (For A While) (December 12)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    There is a lack of quality coverage about the song. This review is written by an AI.

    Anyone can submit interviews here, made up or not, making it prone to manipulation.

    The AllMusic review is good though. Try finding more like it.

    Good luck! Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Ca talk to me! 12:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:Hey Jude.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Hey Jude.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Blood from a Clone has been accepted

    edit
     
    Blood from a Clone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

    Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

    The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

    Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

    If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

    If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

    Thanks again, and happy editing!

    Cerebellum (talk) 15:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Territorial Pissings (January 12)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mach61 were:
    The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Nevermind. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Mach61 (talk) 17:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Creatures (For a While) (January 14)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mach61 were:
    The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Evolver (311 album). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Mach61 (talk) 22:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Mellowship Slinky in B Major (January 27)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mach61 were:
    The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Blood Sugar Sex Magik. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Per WP:NSONG, If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created. This rules out all but two sources for the purposes of ascertaining notability, namely the FAQ book, which I cannot access but appears promising, and songfacts, which I am not certain is a reliable source.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Mach61 (talk) 00:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Bip Bop (February 19)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChineseGroundnut was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Not clear how this passes WP:NSONG.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    TheChineseGroundnut (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

    File:Stand By Me.jpeg listed for discussion

    edit
     

    A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stand By Me.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 23:12, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Master Exploder

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Master Exploder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:This is the Life

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:This is the Life, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Jackolantern’s Weather

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jackolantern’s Weather, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Whip Your Kids

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Whip Your Kids, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Baby Driver (Simon & Garfunkel song)

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Baby Driver (Simon & Garfunkel song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Lame Claim to Fame

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lame Claim to Fame, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Cumberland Blues

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cumberland Blues, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:King Of Suede

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:King Of Suede, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Gone Troppo (song)

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gone Troppo (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:The World Has Turned And Left Me Here

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The World Has Turned And Left Me Here, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Fish on the Sand

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fish on the Sand, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Now You Know (“Weird Al” Yankovic song)

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Now You Know (“Weird Al” Yankovic song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Rock It (Prime Jive)

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rock It (Prime Jive), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Addicted to Spuds

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Addicted to Spuds, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Flaming Pie (song)

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Flaming Pie (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:The Biggest Ball of Twine in Minnesota

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Biggest Ball of Twine in Minnesota, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:First World Problems (disambiguation)

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First World Problems (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Land Ho! (song)

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Land Ho! (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Happy Birthday (“Weird Al” Yankovic song)

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Happy Birthday (“Weird Al” Yankovic song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your draft article, Draft:Master Exploder

    edit
     

    Hello, Newtatoryd222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Master Exploder".

    In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your draft article, Draft:This is the Life

    edit
     

    Hello, Newtatoryd222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "This is the Life".

    In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your draft article, Draft:Jackolantern’s Weather

    edit
     

    Hello, Newtatoryd222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jackolantern’s Weather".

    In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Dress Me Up As A Robber

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dress Me Up As A Robber, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Man We Was Lonely

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Man We Was Lonely, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Panic Attack (Dream Theater song) (May 31)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Does not currently meet WP:NSONG. It appears this article has potential, but it should be fleshed out more.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Hey man im josh (talk) 13:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your draft article, Draft:King Of Suede

    edit
     

    Hello, Newtatoryd222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "King Of Suede".

    In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your draft article, Draft:The World Has Turned And Left Me Here

    edit
     

    Hello, Newtatoryd222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The World Has Turned And Left Me Here".

    In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your draft article, Draft:Fish on the Sand

    edit
     

    Hello, Newtatoryd222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Fish on the Sand".

    In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Gold (Tears for Fears album) (June 3)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    jlwoodwa (talk) 21:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Gold (Tears for Fears album) has been accepted

    edit
     
    Gold (Tears for Fears album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

    Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

    The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

    Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

    If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

    If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

    Thanks again, and happy editing!

    Dan arndt (talk) 06:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Waiting for the Rapture (June 4)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 10:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    AfC notification: Draft:Waiting for the Rapture has a new comment

    edit

     
    I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Waiting for the Rapture. Thanks! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 10:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Waiting for the Rapture (June 4)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the draft talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. If the subject satisfies general notability, please also indicate on the draft talk page or in AFC comments when resubmitting.

    You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteriaatthe Teahouse.

    This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

    You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

    If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Robert McClenon (talk) 18:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    License tagging for File:TFFGold.jpg

    edit

    Thanks for uploading File:TFFGold.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

    To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your draft article, Draft:Flaming Pie (song)

    edit
     

    Hello, Newtatoryd222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Flaming Pie".

    In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your draft article, Draft:The Biggest Ball of Twine in Minnesota

    edit
     

    Hello, Newtatoryd222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Biggest Ball of Twine in Minnesota".

    In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your draft article, Draft:First World Problems (disambiguation)

    edit
     

    Hello, Newtatoryd222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "First World Problems".

    In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your draft article, Draft:Dress Me Up As A Robber

    edit
     

    Hello, Newtatoryd222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dress Me Up As A Robber".

    In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your draft article, Draft:Land Ho! (song)

    edit
     

    Hello, Newtatoryd222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Land Ho!".

    In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Concern regarding Draft:Medicine Jar (Wings song)

    edit

      Hello, Newtatoryd222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Medicine Jar (Wings song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

    If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

    Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    AfC notification: Draft:Loup (1st Indian on the Moon) has a new comment

    edit

     
    I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Loup (1st Indian on the Moon). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    How do I check if there is a redirect for a page? Newtatoryd222 (talk) 01:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Bite My Head Off (June 17)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    I don't think the currently cited sources give enough information to write an article about this music. They only talk about the involvement of McCartney and basic details. Consider adding this information to Hackney Diamonds instead if you cannot find more in-depth sources.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Ca talk to me! 05:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Replaceable non-free use File:Step Into Christmas.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:Step Into Christmas.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

    1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
    2. Onthe file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

    Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

    If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

    This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Voices of Old People has been accepted

    edit
     
    Voices of Old People, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

    Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

    The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

    Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

    If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

    If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

    Thanks again, and happy editing!

    Chetsford (talk) 04:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Best of the Mamas & the Papas: 20th Century Masters has been accepted

    edit
     
    Best of the Mamas & the Papas: 20th Century Masters, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

    Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

    The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

    Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

    If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

    If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

    Thanks again, and happy editing!

    Waqar💬 16:47, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    I have sent you a note about a page you started

    edit

    Hi Newtatoryd222. Thank you for your work on Best of the Mamas & the Papas: 20th Century Masters. Another editor, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

    Hi Newtatoryd222. Thank you for your contribution to the encyclopedia. Please be sure to not copy & paste full passages from other sources, but summarize the content, as it could be considered a copyright violation. Continued happy editing.

    To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

    StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    If I’m citing a source of a member of the band or the artist who performed or wrote the song, should I use citations? Newtatoryd222 (talk) 18:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    As long as it is coming from a reliable source, yes. However, you do not want to rely heavily on primary sources, but they can be good for additional background and basic information. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Standing on the Corner of the Third World has been accepted

    edit
     
    Standing on the Corner of the Third World, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

    Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

    The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

    Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

    If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

    If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

    Thanks again, and happy editing!

    Waqar💬 19:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: The Working Hour: An Introduction to Tears for Fears (June 21)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    MusicBrainz is user-generated so not a reliable source and the AllMusic review is not in-depth. I suggest checking Newspapers.com via the WP:Wikipedia Library to which you have access and Internet Archive.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    S0091 (talk) 19:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Problems with upload of File:Mamas And Papas 20th Masters.jpeg

    edit

    Thanks for uploading File:Mamas And Papas 20th Masters.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

    To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

    For more information on using images, see the following pages:

    Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:31, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    AfC notification: Draft:Friends to Go has a new comment

    edit

     
    I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Friends to Go. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Orphaned non-free image File:TFFGoldVideos.jpeg

    edit
     

    Thanks for uploading File:TFFGoldVideos.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 08:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Friends to Go (June 23)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Sources are either interviews, based on what those affiliated say or catalogue entries.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    S0091 (talk) 17:06, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: 20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection: The Best of The Who has been accepted

    edit
     
    20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection: The Best of The Who, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

    Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

    The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

    Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

    If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

    If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

    Thanks again, and happy editing!

    Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    AfC notification: Draft:20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of ABBA has a new comment

    edit

     
    I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of ABBA. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: 20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of ABBA has been accepted

    edit
     
    20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of ABBA, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

    Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

    The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

    Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

    If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

    If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

    Thanks again, and happy editing!

    Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: 20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection: Best of Tears for Fears has been accepted

    edit
     
    20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection: Best of Tears for Fears, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

    Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

    The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

    Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

    If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

    If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

    Thanks again, and happy editing!

    Waqar💬 06:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: 20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of Cream (June 26)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    S0091 (talk) 19:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    AfC notification: Draft:Flowers Never Bend with the Rainfall has a new comment

    edit

     
    I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Flowers Never Bend with the Rainfall. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Flowers Never Bend with the Rainfall has been accepted

    edit
     
    Flowers Never Bend with the Rainfall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

    Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

    The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

    Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

    If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

    If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

    Thanks again, and happy editing!

    Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Your submission at Articles for creation: Mellowship Slinky in B Major (June 29)

    edit
     
    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Garsh2 was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:
    Article has not seen any real additions since its last submission. See previous comments for additional information.
    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
    Garsh (talk) 03:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

    Add topic

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Newtatoryd222&oldid=1231588845"
     



    Last edited on 29 June 2024, at 03:49  


    Languages

     



    This page is not available in other languages.
     

    Wikipedia


    This page was last edited on 29 June 2024, at 03:49 (UTC).

    Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Terms of Use

    Desktop