edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Five transclusions, but all are easily navigable. Painting17 (talk) 23:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Created by blocked user. All three articles in this template are easily navigable. Painting17 (talk) 23:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Created by blocked user. Fails WP:NENAN Painting17 (talk) 23:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 23:14, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Four links. Created by blocked user. Painting17 (talk) 23:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Four transclusions. Created by a banned user, but I'm not sure if it fits WP:G5 Painting17 (talk) 22:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 20:53, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Three links. Painting17 (talk) 17:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 20:52, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All links including adaptations included at {{Kingsley Amis}} --woodensuperman 15:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was mergetoTemplate:Virginia Woolf. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 20:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Template:Mrs Dalloway with Template:Virginia Woolf.
No need for a standalone navbox when the majority of the links are included at the target. Perhaps we could add an adaptations section for Mrs Dalloway (film) and any other works based on her novels to avoid multiple navboxes. See outcome at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 April 13#Template:Of Human Bondage for similar situation. --woodensuperman 15:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 14:10, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Substantial duplication of {{Batman in film}}. The Batman franchise is already very well navigable by multiple navboxes. --woodensuperman 13:51, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 14:10, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Another Batman navbox? Really? Already well covered by {{Batman in film}}, {{Batman video games}} and {{Batman music}}. We don't need another navbox for the crossover. --woodensuperman 13:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
Keep i think we should keep it they are separate from the other batman films Friendlyhistorian (talk) 20:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relistedon2023 July 11. ✗plicit 14:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relistedon2023 July 11. ✗plicit 14:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fancruft template created by a blocked user and used on three pages Painting17 (talk) 11:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Two transclusions Painting17 (talk) 11:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relistedon2023 July 11. ✗plicit 14:11, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused sidebar which is not a sandbox version of Template:WikiProject Zoo. Gonnym (talk) 05:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused navbox since only 1 coach has an article to navigate to. Gonnym (talk) 05:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused table. Gonnym (talk) 05:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused WikiProject template. No A class reviews since 2009. Gonnym (talk) 05:39, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relistedon2023 July 11. Izno (talk) 22:50, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
