edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:43, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused roster template with no documentation or template parameters. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:08, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
Delete possible usage would be on Frederick Keys (if it's up-to-date), but not enough usages to justify a template. If someone thinks it'll add value to Frederick Keys article, then subst it there. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
Keep Subst onto the article for the team. This was hidden because of this edit. the team is no longer a minor league but instead part of the MLB Draft League. However, it does not mean it should be deleted simply because of the change in the team's status. It needs to be updated. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
-
It's a roster from 2020, substing it is no benefit at all. Someone can just add the same table with the up-to-date information instead of substing this outdated information. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
-
If you subst it on to the team article, then it becomes easier to update. You're thinking about this backwards. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
delete, out-of-date, no need to keep it. I will put the correct one in the article. Frietjes (talk) 17:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 21:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
Delete per Frietjes. This is a classic example of why I'm always against 11th-hour rescue missions of unused templates - content is best added based on the needs of 2023, not via artifacts of years-old wikiarcheological dives. I'm not sure why this had to be relisted. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:33, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions or documentation. It appears to be some sort of flag template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. It may be useful, but there is no way to know. Created in August 2022. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This unused navbox would be much better as a category, a list article, or both. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author request. ✗plicit 03:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions or links from discussion pages. Appears to be a copy of Template:IPA chart/core1. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
It was created by mistake. Please delete it Prinaki (talk) 10:11, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate of Template:Finnish Chief of Defence DB1729talk 17:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2012. No longer needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, probably for the reasons described in this November 2022 TFD for a similar template. Probably not needed anymore. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Templates for military moldings Ukraine
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In a recently closed discussion the consensus was that templates such as this, which provide a linked shield along with an identical link to the unit attached to it, are unnecessary due to MOS:ICON and "bad practice" (I believe this was specifically the "image link being the same as the wikilink" bit). These are the other templates from this template family. I am recommending, per the consensus/precedent of the previous discussion, that the template be replaced with their respective wikilinks (i.e. remove the icons) and deleted. Primefac (talk) 12:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused weather box. Gonnym (talk) 12:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8byAnomie (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Set index articles with links needing disambiguation was deleted. Gonnym (talk) 12:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unusable navigation template as all links are red. Gonnym (talk) 12:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused WikiProject sub-template. Gonnym (talk) 12:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused Template:WikiProject Anime and manga sub templaets. Gonnym (talk) 12:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused WikiProject sub-template. Gonnym (talk) 12:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused WikiProject sub-template. Gonnym (talk) 12:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused WikiProject sub template. Gonnym (talk) 12:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused WikiProject sub template. Gonnym (talk) 12:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused Template:WikiProject Karachi sub templates. Gonnym (talk) 12:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused WikiProject sub template. Gonnym (talk) 12:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
Delete not needed — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused category template as the defunct project has no article categories. Gonnym (talk) 12:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused sub templates of Template:WikiProject Vital Articles. Gonnym (talk) 11:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unused language related template. Gonnym (talk) 11:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
-
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not enough links to warrant a navbox. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
-
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
