Editors can self-assess articles against the five B-class criteria(FAQ) up to and including C-Class. If you have made significant improvements to an article against one or more of B-class criteria and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below, specifying which criteria you have worked on. If you feel unable to assess against one or more of the B-class criteria, please say so when posting. Requests for formal A-Class review should be made at the review department. Please consider entering articles you have improved in the military history article writing contest.
Experienced assessors are encouraged to take a look at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators#AutoCheck report for June and check a few of ≈ B-Class assessments. Feel free to downgrade them if you consider they don't meet one or more the criteria. Please also delete any that you have checked. See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight/Assessment, whose articles often overlap with military history topics.
-
Surface Fleet Review Australian navy procurement document. Created this article and put in everything in it, I thought it would be worthy of a B-class but because I have created it I may have inflated it a bit. Thanks DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 06:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-
Edit: just had a look at some other B-class articles and thought that SFR is probably not worth b-class. I would appreciate if an editor could tell me whether it is worth a C-class or if it should remain at start. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 06:41, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-
I am leaving a message on your talk page about additional citations and perhaps a minor tweak which can bring this up to B class. Rather than leave it with a lower rating, I think we should leave the request open and you can note that the article has been revised and ready for assessment. Donner60 (talk) 23:38, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-
Defence Honours and Awards scandal. The mil-hist bot assessed it as start with the criteria for 1 & 2 not met, I've checked the inline citations and fixed up any that I found. For point 2) Coverage and accuracy, I've added what I could find with RS's going back to 1993 when the subject matter all started. I'd love for someone to check it over, eventually I want to get it up to A class. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 00:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-
I agree with Nick-D that the title does not seem to fit the situation. It appears to me to be more like a controversy than a scandal - unless perhaps that is how it is viewed by reliable sources. The lede (introduction) needs to be expanded to summarize the main points of the article. Otherwise, I think it has been revised enough to pass B class. Donner60 (talk) 07:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-
When Nick-D said that it was called '2024 review of the Defence Honours and Awards system', by definition it seems to fit (Senator Roberts called General Campbell guilty of stolen valour indirectly during a senate hearing), but I'm completely open for it to change. Cheers, I'll work on the lead. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 07:35, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-
No politician is a reliable source for rhetoric, and this is especially the case for extremists like Senator Roberts. Nick-D (talk) 07:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-
@Nford24 and Nick-D: True. That should also be addressed. Donner60 (talk) 23:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-
Yuri Baluyevsky - please assess. Romanov loyalist (talk) 00:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-
B class. If any of the sources has information about whether he has been married or has children, please add it. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 07:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-
32nd Tank Regiment (Italy), last of the Italian tank units and 250th article about an Italian Army regiment of battalion to assess. Thank you, noclador (talk) 12:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please also check the military history assessment backlog for articles needing assessment.
