curprev23:3923:39, 25 April 2016 71.220.185.68talk 7,783 bytes+6 There is no evidence for a patent on the hybrid (although it does appear to be a trade secret). Hybrids are typically not patented unless they're genetically engineered or something.undo
curprev21:3921:39, 28 July 2015 65.129.119.201talk 7,084 bytes+293 Replaced ambiguous, midleading statement that didn't have a citation with a new statement that does. Also, added information about its heat tolerance.undo
27 July 2015
curprev03:1403:14, 27 July 2015 2602:306:2527:a419:44ff:84ab:1753:6409talk 6,791 bytes−506 Removed bias in article which listed four random unrelated tomato varieties with "roughly" similar days to maturity, which were arbitrarily suggested among thousands; removed GMO politics on this factual entry with incorrect premise/conclusion on PVPundo
curprev10:4510:45, 4 February 2014 Groupsometalkcontribs m6,737 bytes−858 Removed part about Monsanto owning the patent. They bought the company that bought the company that created the EG tomato in 1975, but the patent would have long been expired. ~~inundo