Gemini 1: Difference between revisions

{{Short description|First Gemini program spacelaunch}}

{{Use American English|date=June 2019}}

| distance_travelled = {{convert|2789864|km|mi|sp=us|order=flip}}

| launch_mass = {{convert|3187|kg|lb|order=flip}} <br/>({{convert|5170|kg|lb|order=flip}} with 2nd stage)

| orbit_epoch = April 10, 1964<ref name=satcat>{{cite web|last=McDowell|first=Jonathan|title=SATCAT|url=http://planet4589.org/space/log/satcat.txt|publisher=Jonathan's Space Pages|access-date=March 23, 2014}}</ref>

| orbit_periapsis = {{convert|155|km|nmi|sp=us|order=flip}}

| orbit_apoapsis = {{convert|271|km|nmi|sp=us|order=flip}}

'''Gemini 1''' was the first mission in [[NASA]]'s [[Gemini program]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraft/display.action?id=1964-018A|title=Gemini 1|publisher=NASA Space Science Data Coordinated Archive|access-date=June 28, 2018}}</ref> An uncrewed test flight of the Gemini spacecraft, its main objectives were to test the structural integrity of the new spacecraft and [[Titan II GLV|modified Titan II launch vehicle]]. It was also the first test of the new tracking and communication systems for the Gemini program and provided training for the ground support crews for the first crewed missions.<ref>{{cite web|title=Gemini 1|url=http://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/gemini-1.htm|publisher=Gunter's Space Page|date=December 11, 2017|access-date=October 15, 2012}}</ref>

Originally scheduled for launch in December 1963, difficulties in the development of both the spacecraft and its booster caused four months of delay. Gemini 1 was launched from [[Launch Complex 19]]at[[Cape Canaveral Air Force Station|Cape Kennedy]] (now Canaveral), Florida on April 8, 1964. The spacecraft stayed attached to the second stage of the rocket. The mission lasted for three [[orbit]]s while test data were taken, but the spacecraft stayed in space for almost 64 orbits until its orbit decayed due to atmospheric drag. The spacecraft was not intended to be recovered, and holes were drilled through its heat shield to ensure it would not survive re-entry.

[[Project Gemini]] was conceived as a bridge between America's single-seat [[Project Mercury]] and the three-seat [[Project Apollo]]. With a design largely extrapolated from its predecessor,<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|71}} the Gemini spacecraft would allow two astronauts to conduct the maneuvers inherent in Apollo's lunar mission: rendezvous, docking, and changing of orbit. Moreover, Gemini would support astronauts in space for extended flights, approximating the expected length of the Apollo missions.<ref name="Orloff">{{cite book |last1=Hacker |first1=Barton C. |last2=Grimwood |first2=James M. |title=On the Shoulders of Titans: A History of Project Gemini |url=http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4203/toc.htm |access-date=March 11, 2019 |series=NASA History Series |orig-year=First published 1977 |date=February 2003 |publisher=[[NASA]] |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=9781493775910 |id=NASA SP-4203 |chapter=Table of Contents |chapter-url=http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4203/toc.htm |archive-date=January 13, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100113132344/http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4203/toc.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref>{{rp|55–74}}

Its two-person capacity and greater capabilities meant that Gemini would be a substantially heavier spacecraft than Mercury had been — too heavy to be lofted into orbit by Mercury's [[Atlas LV-3B|Atlas]] rocket. A replacement was needed. The newly developed Titan II ICBM (which had also been tapped by the [[United States Air Force|Air Force]] for its [[Boeing X-20 Dyna-Soar|X-20 spaceplane project]]) was an attractive replacement. It had a thrust some two and a half times that of the Atlas, a far simpler mechanical construction, and the ability to store propellants indefinitely. Moreover, the Titan II's propellants mixed less violently than those of Atlas meaning a booster explosion, should it happen, would be less violent. This made obsolete the heavy escape tower used in the Mercury program; instead, ejection seats could be used.<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|41–42}}

The primary goal of the first Gemini mission was to flight test the [[Titan II GLV|modified Titan II launch vehicle]] and the basic structural soundness of the Gemini capsule under launch and orbital conditions. Consequently, the first Gemini capsule could be a largely boilerplate structure.<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|181}} Secondary goals of the mission included testing the remote guidance systems, the Titan's redundancy systems, and evaluation of the Gemini-Titan malfunction detection system.<ref name=avweek1964a>{{cite magazine| date = April 13, 1964| title = First Successful Gemini Mission Points to Manned Flight in 1964| url = http://archive.aviationweek.com/issue/19640413#!&pid=28| magazine = Aviation Week and Space Technology| location = New York| publisher = McGraw Hill Publishing Company| access-date = March 14, 2019}}</ref>

Gemini Spacecraft Number 1 was built specifically for the uncrewed mission. Most internal systems were replaced with dummies and ballast approximating the weight and balance of the crewed spacecraft. In place of the crew couches, two palletsofinstruments were installed for the relaying via [[telemetry]] of the [[pressure]], [[oscillation|vibration]], [[acceleration]], [[temperature]], and structural loads experienced during the short flight. A spacecraft [[ablative heat shield|heat shield]] was installed, but four large holes were drilled in it to ensure Gemini 1 was destroyed during reentry.<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|181}}

<gallery class="center">

Image:Gemini1 pallets.jpg|Gemini 1 Instrument Pallets

Image:Gemini1 right pallet.jpg|Gemini 1 Right Pallet

Image:Gemini1 left pallet.jpg|Gemini 1 Left Pallet

Even with the simplified systems, this first Gemini encountered several weeks of delay in testing. Nevertheless, it was not the spacecraft that caused the launch date, originally planned for December 1963, to slip. Rather, it was the testing and man-rating of the [[LGM-25C Titan II|Titan II]] launch vehicle. Assembled on May 21, 1963, the first Titan-Gemini launch vehicle required comprehensive testing and retesting, and it was not until October that it was ready for transport to the launch site — where considerable preparation still had to be done.<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|185}} Moreover, there was concern that the Titan II produced too much vertical oscillation ([[Pogo oscillation|pogo]]) to be usable at all, and consideration was given to using the [[Saturn I]] rocket instead, at least for the first missions. However, on November 1, 1963, the Air Force flew a Titan II rocket with [[Standpipe (plumbing)|standpipes]] in its oxidizer lines and mechanical accumulators in its fuel lines, which suppressed the pogo effect.<ref name=popci>{{Cite news|url=https://www.popsci.com/how-nasa-chose-an-untested-missile-to-launch-gemini|title=Why Did NASA Choose an Untested Missile to Launch Gemini?|work=Popular Science|date=January 17, 2016|access-date=March 15, 2019|language=en}}</ref>

Inefficient project management threatened to further delay the first Gemini launch, which by November had already been pushed back to February 28, 1964. Gemini Manager Charles Mathews united the several disparate teams into a single Gemini Launch Vehicle Coordination Committee with clearly defined management and communication channels.<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|188}} This measure ensured that no more time would be lost due to uncertain authority, duplicated effort, or conflicting decisions. Still, issues that arose during testing caused the launch date to slip further.<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|189}} The Titan II booster was not ready for final readiness testing until March 3, 1964, the same day that Gemini Spacecraft Number 1 arrived at the launch complex for mating with its booster.<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|190}} Faulty test equipment caused a further delay of two weeks. By late March, all serious hurdles cleared, Gemini 1's launch date was set for April 7.<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|195}} The resolution of a failure in the secondary autopilot caused one last day of delay. Finally, by noon of the seventh, Gemini 1's Mission Review Board determined unanimously that all systems were cleared for flight.<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|197}}

== Mission and results ==

After a flawless countdown, Gemini 1's Titan II booster lifted off from Cape Kennedy's (now Canaveral) Launch Complex 19<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|194}} at 11:00:01 EDT, April 8, 1964.<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|197}} The first stage was jettisoned after two and a half minutes with the rocket {{convert|64|km|nmi|order=flip}} high and {{convert|91|km|nmi|order=flip}} downrange. At that moment, there was an unexpected three-second loss of signal from the craft. It was later determined that this brief communications blackout was caused by charged ions from the separation and startup of the second stage, similar to the blackout during spacecraft reentry. All subsequent Gemini flights would have the same brief blackout.<ref>Chris Kraft, ''Flight'', p. 203.</ref>

The spacecraft achieved orbit five and a half minutes after launch. The launch vehicle had imparted an excess 7 meters (24 feet) per second of velocity to the Gemini 1, placing the spacecraft into an orbit with an apogee of {{convert|320|km|nmi|sp=us|order=flip}} instead of the planned {{convert|299|km|nmi|sp=us|order=flip}}. This lengthened Gemini 1's lifespan from the planned three and a half days to four.<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|199}}

The formal mission of Gemini 1 was over long before that. Its battery had only been designed to last a single orbit,<ref name=avweek1964prea>{{cite magazine| date = April 6, 1964| title = Gemini Flight Readied| url = http://archive.aviationweek.com/issue/19640406#!&pid=26| magazine = Aviation Week and Space Technology| location = New York| publisher = McGraw Hill Publishing Company| access-date = April 8, 2019}}</ref> and only the first three orbits — lasting four hours and 50 minutes — were part of the flight plan. Gemini 1 and its attached second stage were tracked by the [[Manned Space Flight Network]] until they reentered over the [[Atlantic Ocean|South Atlantic]], midway between [[South America]] and [[Africa]], on April 12, 1964, during their 64th orbit.<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|199}}

As a result of the successful flight, the Titan II was considered "man-rated" (safe for use in human spaceflight).<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|200}} Man-rating the Gemini capsule itself would not be accomplished until the launch of [[Gemini 2]] nine months later, on January 19, 1965.<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|209}}

The Gemini 1 mission was supported by 5,176 [[United States Department of Defense]] personnel, as well as eleven aircraft and three ships provided by the Department of Defense.<ref name="Orloff"/>{{rp|Appendix G-299}}

{{Reflist}}

* [http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4203/cover.htm ''On The Shoulders of Titans: A History of Project Gemini''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20031207111557/http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4203/cover.htm |date=2003-12-07 }}

*[https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19670095753.pdf Gemini Program Mission Report for Gemini-Titan 1 (GT-1)] from the [https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp NASA Technical Reports Server]. Retrieved 4 July 2019.

{{Authority control}}