curprev16:0916:09, 10 July 2024 194.230.148.55talk 9,327 bytes+5 removed defamatory language that is not in line with universal human rights standards with respect to freedom of religionundo
curprev00:1500:15, 8 December 2022 45.215.255.61talk 7,494 bytes−1 More accurate representation of the fact that Lee Man Hee is (very categorically) a cult leader and not a religious leader. Also several reports have surfaced highlighting the nefarious and manipulative tactics of this cult in isolating and indoctrinating their victims.undoTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
curprev17:5317:53, 23 February 2020 John B123talkcontribs 4,131 bytes+79 Adding local short description: "South Korean Pastor, Religious Leader and Peace Activist", overriding Wikidata description "South Korean Pastor, Religious Leader and Peace Activist - activist for the reunification of Korea and international law to establish peace" (Shortdesc helper)undo
curprev09:0109:01, 23 February 2020 Kimchiphotostalkcontribs 3,774 bytes−5 Changed Juxlos’ edit. Again, here’s why: Changed “cult” to “religious.” The reasoning here is that it’s one thing to accuse a person or group of being a cult/cult leader, but entirely another to state it as fact. Doing so adds personal bias to the article. Retaining the accusations within the article is fair, the statement of presumed fact, however, is not. If the term “cult leader” is applicable, then edits that reflect that title should be made to the pages of every living religious leader...undoTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
curprev23:5623:56, 21 February 2020 Kimchiphotostalkcontribs 2,846 bytes+5 Changed Juxlos’ edit. Again, here’s why: Changed “cult” to “religious.” The reasoning here is that it’s one thing to accuse a person or group of being a cult/cult leader, but entirely another to state it as fact. Doing so adds personal bias to the article. Retaining the accusations within the article is fair, the statement of presumed fact, however, is not.undoTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
curprev12:0312:03, 21 February 2020 Kimchiphotostalkcontribs 2,846 bytes+5 Changed “cult” to “religious.” The reasoning here is that it’s one thing to accuse a person or group of being a cult/cult leader, but entirely another to state it as fact. Doing so adds personal bias to the article. Retaining the accusations within the article is fair, the statement of presumed fact, however, is not.undoTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
curprev09:2509:25, 17 April 2019 82.127.114.138talk 1,234 bytes−703 When we write something that can be read by many people we should be objective. I removed false rumours so people do not sin. Thank youundoTag: references removed
curprev06:5406:54, 11 August 2017 118.220.183.135talk 6,873 bytes−454 Previous statements of this particular individual contained degrading intention and had been written from extremely biased perspective, resulting in a dangerous distortion of information.undoTag: references removed
curprev18:0418:04, 8 June 2017 Light713talkcontribs 8,218 bytes+996 Changed the defamation and lies on an innocent man.Tags: references removedVisual edit
curprev03:0803:08, 18 September 2016 Wikiitupandowntalkcontribs 6,728 bytes−247 I have deleted anything in regards to Shinchonji as I haven't been able to find any primary sources to prove this is true. Please help me find it, but until then I plan to remove it for the sake of credibility.undoTag: Visual edit
curprev05:2905:29, 14 March 2016 Wikiitupandowntalkcontribs 1,875 bytes−1,257 Cult allegations on "credible sources" have no references within their websites that have evidence of being a cult. This is a biased view. It is not a neutral position. A neutral position will not post "cult" because it is based on opinions and not factsundoTag: Visual edit