|
Added quotation from review in Literary Review; separated critical reception/awards into its own section
|
m template closed
|
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== Reception == |
== Reception == |
||
''The Emperor of All Maladies'' won the 2011 [[Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction]]: the jury called it "an elegant inquiry, at once clinical and personal".<ref name=Pulitzer>{{cite web|last=The Pulitzer Prizes|title=The 2011 Pulitzer Prize Winners General Nonfiction|url=http://www.pulitzer.org/citation/2011-General-Nonfiction|accessdate=22 December 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-04-19/nri-achievers/29446649_1_cancer-indian-american-physician-award-winning-science-writer|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121105055532/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-04-19/nri-achievers/29446649_1_cancer-indian-american-physician-award-winning-science-writer|url-status=dead|archive-date=5 November 2012|title=Indian doc's book on cancer wins Pulitzer Prize|date=19 April 2011|accessdate=29 September 2011|newspaper=[[The Times of India]]|location=Boston}}</ref><ref name="NPR" /> ''[[The Guardian]]'' wrote that "Mukherjee manages to convey not only a forensically precise picture of what he sees, but a shiver too, of what he feels."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/jan/23/emperor-maladies-biography-cancer-siddhartha-mukherjee-review|title = The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer by Siddhartha Mukherjee – review| website=[[TheGuardian.com]] |date = 23 January 2011}}</ref> ''[[Literary Review]]'' commended Mukherjee's narrative: "It is so well written, and the science is so clearly explained, that it reads almost like a detective story – which, of course, it is."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://literaryreview.co.uk/the-unnameable|title=The Unnameable|first=Anthony|last=Daniels|website=[[Literary Review]]|date=March 2011}</ref> |
''The Emperor of All Maladies'' won the 2011 [[Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction]]: the jury called it "an elegant inquiry, at once clinical and personal".<ref name=Pulitzer>{{cite web|last=The Pulitzer Prizes|title=The 2011 Pulitzer Prize Winners General Nonfiction|url=http://www.pulitzer.org/citation/2011-General-Nonfiction|accessdate=22 December 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-04-19/nri-achievers/29446649_1_cancer-indian-american-physician-award-winning-science-writer|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121105055532/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-04-19/nri-achievers/29446649_1_cancer-indian-american-physician-award-winning-science-writer|url-status=dead|archive-date=5 November 2012|title=Indian doc's book on cancer wins Pulitzer Prize|date=19 April 2011|accessdate=29 September 2011|newspaper=[[The Times of India]]|location=Boston}}</ref><ref name="NPR" /> ''[[The Guardian]]'' wrote that "Mukherjee manages to convey not only a forensically precise picture of what he sees, but a shiver too, of what he feels."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/jan/23/emperor-maladies-biography-cancer-siddhartha-mukherjee-review|title = The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer by Siddhartha Mukherjee – review| website=[[TheGuardian.com]] |date = 23 January 2011}}</ref> ''[[Literary Review]]'' commended Mukherjee's narrative: "It is so well written, and the science is so clearly explained, that it reads almost like a detective story – which, of course, it is."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://literaryreview.co.uk/the-unnameable|title=The Unnameable|first=Anthony|last=Daniels|website=[[Literary Review]]|date=March 2011}}</ref> |
||
== Title == |
== Title == |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
== Content == |
== Content == |
||
The book weaves together Mukherjee's experiences as a [[hematology]]/[[oncology]] [[Fellowship (medicine)|fellow]] at [[Massachusetts General Hospital]] as well as the history of cancer treatment and research.<ref name="NPR">{{cite news|url= https://www.npr.org/2010/11/17/131382460/an-oncologist-writes-a-biography-of-cancer |title=An Oncologist Writes 'A Biography Of Cancer'|work=Fresh Air from WHYY|publisher=NPR|accessdate=1 August 2011|date=17 November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.denverpost.com/books/ci_16711249|title=Review: "The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer," by Siddhartha Mukherjee|newspaper=[[Denver Post]]|first=Susan|last=Okie|date=28 November 2010|accessdate=29 September 2011}}</ref> Mukherjee gives the history of cancer from its first identification 4,600 years ago by the Egyptian physician [[Imhotep]]. The Greeks had no understanding of cells, but they were familiar with hydraulics. [[Hippocrates]] thus considered illness to be an imbalance of four cardinal fluids: blood, black bile, yellow bile, phlegm. [[Galen]] applied this idea to [[cancer]], believing it to be an imbalance of black bile. In 440 BCE, the Greek historian [[Herodotus]] recorded the first breast tumor excision of [[Atossa]], the queen of [[Persia]] and the daughter of [[Cyrus the Great|Cyrus]], by a Greek slave named [[Democedes]]. The procedure was believed to have been successful temporarily. Galen's theory was later challenged by the work of [[Andreas Vesalius|Andreas Vaselius]] and [[Matthew Baillie|Matthew Baille]], whose dissections of human bodies failed to reveal black bile. |
The book weaves together Mukherjee's experiences as a [[hematology]]/[[oncology]] [[Fellowship (medicine)|fellow]] at [[Massachusetts General Hospital]] as well as the history of cancer treatment and research.<ref name="NPR">{{cite news|url= https://www.npr.org/2010/11/17/131382460/an-oncologist-writes-a-biography-of-cancer |title=An Oncologist Writes 'A Biography Of Cancer'|work=Fresh Air from WHYY|publisher=NPR|accessdate=1 August 2011|date=17 November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.denverpost.com/books/ci_16711249|title=Review: "The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer," by Siddhartha Mukherjee|newspaper=[[Denver Post]]|first=Susan|last=Okie|date=28 November 2010|accessdate=29 September 2011}}</ref> Mukherjee gives the history of cancer from its first identification 4,600 years ago by the Egyptian physician [[Imhotep]]. The Greeks had no understanding of cells, but they were familiar with hydraulics. [[Hippocrates]] thus considered illness to be an imbalance of four cardinal fluids: blood, black bile, yellow bile, phlegm. [[Galen]] applied this idea to [[cancer]], believing it to be an imbalance of black bile. In 440 BCE, the Greek historian [[Herodotus]] recorded the first breast tumor excision of [[Atossa]], the queen of [[Persia]] and the daughter of [[Cyrus the Great|Cyrus]], by a Greek slave named [[Democedes]]. The procedure was believed to have been successful temporarily. Galen's theory was later challenged by the work of [[Andreas Vesalius|Andreas Vaselius]] and [[Matthew Baillie|Matthew Baille]], whose dissections of human bodies failed to reveal black bile. |
||
In the 19th century, [[ |
In the 19th century, [[surgeon]]s devised various approaches to remove tumors, like [[William Halsted]] and the [[radical mastectomy]]. Additionally, [[Emil Grubbe]] used [[X-ray]]s to treat cancer, thus identifying another treatment modality. [[Rudolph Virchow]] first observed [[leukemia]], and [[Franz Ernst Christian Neumann]] localized the pathology to the bone marrow. |
||
In the 20th century, cancer became the second most common cause of death after heart disease in the [[United States]]. [[Sidney Farber]] induced temporary remission in pediatric leukemia using [[ |
In the 20th century, cancer became the second most common cause of death after heart disease in the [[United States]]. [[Sidney Farber]] induced temporary remission in pediatric leukemia using [[antifolate]]s developed by [[Yellapragada Subbarow]]. [[Louis S. Goodman|Louis Goodman]] and [[Alfred Gilman Sr.|Alfred Gilman]] also used [[nitrogen mustard]] to treat [[lymphoma]]. The [[National Cancer Institute]] (NCI) introduced [[clinical trial]]s to test the efficacy of [[chemotherapy]]. Recognizing the possibility for a cure, Farber sought funding for his efforts through [[The Jimmy Fund]] and [[Mary Lasker]]. Inspired by the [[Space Race]], Farber and Lasker appealed to the nation and [[President Nixon]] to enact legislation for the [[War on Cancer]], resulting in the passage of the National Cancer Act of 1971 and increased funding for the NCI. |
||
The book also reviews the origins of [[hospice]] and [[palliative medicine]] and [[cancer screening]]. |
The book also reviews the origins of [[hospice]] and [[palliative medicine]] and [[cancer screening]]. |
||
Cover of The Emperor of All Maladies
| |
| Author | Siddhartha Mukherjee |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Subject | Cancer |
| Genre | Non-fiction |
| Publisher | Scribner |
Publication date | 16 November 2010 |
| Publication place | United States |
| Pages | 592 |
| ISBN | 978-1-4391-0795-9 |
The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer is a book written by Siddhartha Mukherjee, an Indian-born American physician and oncologist. It was published on 16 November 2010 by Scribner.
The Emperor of All Maladies won the 2011 Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction: the jury called it "an elegant inquiry, at once clinical and personal".[1][2][3] The Guardian wrote that "Mukherjee manages to convey not only a forensically precise picture of what he sees, but a shiver too, of what he feels."[4] Literary Review commended Mukherjee's narrative: "It is so well written, and the science is so clearly explained, that it reads almost like a detective story – which, of course, it is."[5]
The book explains its title in its author's note:[6]
In a sense, this is a military history—one in which the adversary is formless, timeless, and pervasive. Here, too, there are victories and losses, campaigns upon campaigns, heroes and hubris, survival and resilience—and inevitably, the wounded, the condemned, the forgotten, the dead. In the end, cancer truly emerges, as a nineteenth-century surgeon once wrote in a book's frontispiece, as "the emperor of all maladies, the king of terrors."
The book weaves together Mukherjee's experiences as a hematology/oncology fellowatMassachusetts General Hospital as well as the history of cancer treatment and research.[3][7] Mukherjee gives the history of cancer from its first identification 4,600 years ago by the Egyptian physician Imhotep. The Greeks had no understanding of cells, but they were familiar with hydraulics. Hippocrates thus considered illness to be an imbalance of four cardinal fluids: blood, black bile, yellow bile, phlegm. Galen applied this idea to cancer, believing it to be an imbalance of black bile. In 440 BCE, the Greek historian Herodotus recorded the first breast tumor excision of Atossa, the queen of Persia and the daughter of Cyrus, by a Greek slave named Democedes. The procedure was believed to have been successful temporarily. Galen's theory was later challenged by the work of Andreas Vaselius and Matthew Baille, whose dissections of human bodies failed to reveal black bile.
In the 19th century, surgeons devised various approaches to remove tumors, like William Halsted and the radical mastectomy. Additionally, Emil Grubbe used X-rays to treat cancer, thus identifying another treatment modality. Rudolph Virchow first observed leukemia, and Franz Ernst Christian Neumann localized the pathology to the bone marrow.
In the 20th century, cancer became the second most common cause of death after heart disease in the United States. Sidney Farber induced temporary remission in pediatric leukemia using antifolates developed by Yellapragada Subbarow. Louis Goodman and Alfred Gilman also used nitrogen mustard to treat lymphoma. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) introduced clinical trials to test the efficacy of chemotherapy. Recognizing the possibility for a cure, Farber sought funding for his efforts through The Jimmy Fund and Mary Lasker. Inspired by the Space Race, Farber and Lasker appealed to the nation and President Nixon to enact legislation for the War on Cancer, resulting in the passage of the National Cancer Act of 1971 and increased funding for the NCI.
The book also reviews the origins of hospice and palliative medicine and cancer screening.
According to Mukherjee, the book was a response to the demand of a patient: "I'm willing to go on fighting, but I need to know what it is that I'm battling."[8] Mukherjee states that two of his influences for the book were Randy Shilts' And the Band Played On and Richard Rhodes' The Making of the Atomic Bomb, but the defining moment for him was "when he conceived of his book as a biography".[8]
It was described, by the magazine TIME, as one of the 100 most influential books of the last 100 years,[9] and by The New York Times magazine as among the 100 best works of non-fiction.[10]
The epilogue, "Atossa's War", discusses prognosis and the ultimate goals of cancer treatment.
Books
