|
Hi@Death Editor 2:, I noticed that you are adding death information to biographies on here without adding reliable sources. Simply copying url links into the summary box of your edit is not sufficient, the page itself must be referenced with reliable sources (read WP:RS if unsure) in all instances of displaying death information for subjects (i.e. infobox, lede, main body OR categories at the foot of the page). To not do this, and edit as you have done here is a serious violation. Hope you understand and that you'll use sources in future. Thanks Jkaharper (talk) 09:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Generalrelative (talk) 17:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Vichy France. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 03:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Vichy France. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:29, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add unsourcedororiginal content, as you did with this edittoWeldon Olson. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The information you wrote of his death date is wrong 2600:1014:B00F:16A0:4195:3828:7BB:A88D (talk) 02:12, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On 25 May 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ella Stack, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 03:29, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On 1 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Harald zur Hausen, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:57, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On 5 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jessie Maple, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 16:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On 15 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Robert Holmes Bell, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 03:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Danny Masterson, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. glman (talk) 21:45, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted your removal of the "Historical accuracy" section at Valkyrie (film). Such sections are completely appropriate for historical films. See WP:FILMHIST. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 16:25, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please, cease your edit war in the article about Yaroslav Hunka. Wikipedia rule WP:BLP specifically says that: "BLPs should be written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone, avoiding both understatement and overstatement".
By categorizing this article into "white supremacists" category, you are adding a very controversial statement, ungrounded in any secondary reliable source, which could harm a living person. This directly violates a number of Wikipedia rules. --Amakuha (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits to change the number of planned flight tests from 2 to 1 with a clear consensus against you constitutes vandalism. Please stop. Redacted II (talk) 15:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussionatWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Redacted II (talk) 20:34, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kfar Aza massacre, you may be blocked from editing. Jeppiz (talk) 17:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Death Editor 2, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 03:31, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 19:45, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally editors must be logged-in have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:07, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventionsorconsensus, as you did to Fort Eisenhower. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Please do not move a page while a requested move discussion is pending. I reverted your moves twice, though the discussion resulted in a move per WP:SNOW. estar8806 (talk) ★ 00:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 1RR violation. Slow moving edit warring is still edit warring WP:SLOWEW. [2], [3] // Timothy :: talk 08:44, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. // Timothy :: talk 19:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I removed the compromise note as it no longer applies (the FWS review concluded yesterday). If you have any objections, then please revert the edit. Redacted II (talk) 17:38, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 05:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Sam Bankman-Fried) for BLP vios.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Valereee (talk) 17:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not change articles to say someone has died without citing a reliable source. Adding deaths to biographies of living persons must be sourced. Thanks. Escape Orbit (Talk) 11:02, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, you may be blocked from editing. You have again changed Nagorno-Karabakh conflict without consensus. There is a talk page discussion which you are aware of at Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh conflict#Is the conflict over?. You are engaged in a slow moving edit war [4], [5], [6] to get your POV on a subject into the article.
This area is covered by three different CTopics warnings, Armenia and Azerbaijan, Infobox edits, and Eastern Europe. // Timothy :: talk 20:47, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. // Timothy :: talk 21:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. // Timothy :: talk 05:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. User:Ymblanter (talk) 19:56, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Virgil_Griffith regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TIB (talk) 23:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sourcestoverify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Boudewijn de Geer article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 20:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm StefenTower. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person onEwald Frank, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There is no sources given for the subject's death. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 17:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]