curprev08:4308:43, 13 July 2020 128.243.2.43talk 3,903 bytes−1,374 The new edits (by Rpsear) to the Weber number are wrong and poorly worded. It removes a lot of the previous hard work in defining the equations and what each symbol in the equation is, this is exactly the same as the edits that Rpsear did to the Stokes number wiki page which again were oversimplified and wrongundo