(Discuss) – Honda CBX1000 → Honda CBX – The subject of the article was never referred to as the CBX1000, only as the CBX. Subsequent Honda models designations have included the prefix "CBX" and a displacement number, but this model did not have a displacement number, just "CBX". All sources in the article refer to the "CBX", not the "CBX1000". The term "CBX1000" is the invention of the editor who moved this article from "Honda CBX" to "Honda CBX1000" relisted Tiggerjay (talk) 07:21, 14 April 2013 (UTC) Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 11:34, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Starships (song) → Starships – Looking at the disambiguation page, this article is the only one that spells "Starships" in that styling. The novel "Star ships", while similarly titled to "Starship", is different enough to be titled without parenthetical clarification. With that reasoning, I would suggest that "Starships" be moved to the plain title and include a hatnote referring to the disambiguation page. WikiRedactor (talk) 23:11, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Statistical area → ? – The term "statistical area" is a generic one referring to any kind of geographic unit used for collection or reporting of some sort of statistic (i.e. data). Contrary to its use in this article, it is not a specific term for metropolitan areas, and it is not used in that narrow fashion by the U.S. Census Bureau. The current article should be significantly edited and moved to a new title to be determined more consistent with its scope, and a new short article about "statistical areas" in general should be created at this page. --Relisted. Steel1943 (talk) 17:26, 13 April 2013 (UTC) Orlady (talk) 03:40, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Three lifting surface aircraft → Three surface aircraft – Along researches for "canard/stabiliser", I looked for "three surface" designations. :1) Abzug/Larrabee (Airplane stability and control) gives "three surface case", "three surface configuration". :2) Roskam (Airplane Design) : "three-surface configuration". :3) Mason (Configuration aerodynamics) gives "Three surface concept". :4) Kendall, E.R.. The Aerodynamics of Three-Surface Airplanes, AIAA-84-2508:5) Owens, D. Bruce & Coe, Paul L., Jr. Exploratory Wind Tunnel Investigation of the Stability and Control Characteristics of a Three-Surface, Forward-Swept Wing Advanced Turboprop Model. AIAA-90-3074 August 1990:6) Agnew, J.W., and Lyerla, G.W., and Grafton, S.B. The Linear and Non-Linear Aerodynamics of Three-Surface Aircraft Concepts. AIAA-80-1581 October/November 1984:7) Strohmeyer, D., Seubert, R., Heinze, W., Osterheld, C., Fornasier, L. Three Surface Aircraft – A Concept for Future Transport Aircraft. AIAA-00-0566 January 2000:8) Agnew, J.W., Hess, J.R., Jr. Benefits of Aerodynamic Integration to the Three Surface Configuration. AIAA-79-1830 August 1979:9) Bill Husa, Orion Technologies, "Three surface design":10) Chris Conrad, Elizabeth Craig, Matt Eluk "Three surface aircraft":11) Ilan Kroo, Stanford, Design and Analysis of Optimally-Loaded Lifting Systems, "Three-surface designs":12) Three surface aircraft - A Concept for future large aircraft[1]:13) Wichmann, G., Strohmeyer, D., Streit, Th. Investigation of a Three-Surface Airplane Configuration. Proceedings ODAS 99, 1st ONERA - DLR Aerospace Symposium, Paris, France, 21-24 June 1999So, "Three surface" + aircraft (or airplane, configuration, design, concept) seems to be a general/basic designation, including "Three lifting surface", when the reciprocal is not true (because the tail is not a lifting (conventionally speaking) surface. Do you agree this article be renamed "Three surface aircraft" ? Plxdesi2 (talk) 13:56, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Howard Davis (architect) → Howard Davis (author and professor of architecture) – I am the subject of this article and the title is inaccurate. I am not an architect, but an author and professor of architecture. This matter has been referred to me by an individual affiliated with my state's architectural licensing board, which deems it illegal for a person to be referred to as an "architect" if he or she is not. This is therefore a legal matter in addition to being a matter of fact. 63.224.200.24 (talk) 04:56, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – 1938 Tiberias pogrom → 1938 Tiberias massacre – The use of the term "pogrom" to label the event(s) described in this article appears to be based on original research. The verifiable sources used in this article (in which there are three—at least two that are in English—don't use the word pogrom; the League of Nations source uses "massacre" while the mandate report in the UN source uses "general raid," although it also says it was well-planned. The other sources used are not readily available to be verified. In my google book search I did not find any source, other than those that reference Wikipedia, that describes the event as a pogrom. --Al Ameer son (talk) 22:43, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Boat lift → Canal boat lift – This article has a serious name problem. The 1875 "Anderton Boat Lift" clearly has precedence, if that was the term used originally. But modern US and worldwide usage of the term is for the fixed device to store boats above the water at docks. (Question: what are the translations of the non-English names used for these products?) Previous discussion cites the 200+ patents as use of the term. I note that the Anderton device is always described using two words, and the storage device as one word.I propose a two name changes: rename the present article to Canal boat lift, and rename ShiplifttoShiplift or Dock Boatlift. The latter article includes some mention of traveling lifts, to park multiple big ships; it should be expanded to include sling-types, and boatyard/marina cranes. A paragraph was added for pleasure craft storage-type dock boatlifts. When enough material is available about the history of those things, that could be put into its own Dock Boatlift article. If or is a no-no in a title, then I suppose portable boat lift could be renamed as Dock Boatlift for now and rewritten to include the paragraph in Shiplift and also the portable cranes which are apparently also called Boat lifts, until there is enough content about the cranes to justify an article. 165.121.80.132 (talk) 01:20, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Vidal Blanc → Vidal blanc – Should "blanc" be de-capped? Many sources use "Blanc", according to Google results, and some used "blanc". Now that I'm abstaining from this request, I wonder if "blanc" is more accurate than "Blanc". George Ho (talk) 21:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Isotope dilution → Isotope dilution – In science, the term "isotope dilution" is the standard, not the adjectival "isotopic dilution" j.meija 13:57, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
(Discuss) – Sexuality → Sexuality (disambiguation) – Putting aside the songs, which are of minor notability, it is positively silly to have a disambiguation page regularly generating dozens on incoming links in order to split hairs between kinds of sexuality, human, animal, and possibly plant. I would move this page to its (disambiguation) title and redirect the title to sex. bd2412T03:03, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Integrational linguistics (Hans-Heinrich Lieb) → Integrational linguistics (IL) – The article "Integrational linguistics (IL)," about the approach based on Hans-Heinrich Lieb's work, was created recently. The article mentioned and linked to Integrational linguistics, which is about the separate approach of the same name developed by Roy Harris. Going through the new pages backlog, I found "Integrational linguistics (IL)" and decided to move it to "Integrational linguistics (Hans-Heinrich Lieb)," as I thought "(IL)" was not very clear. I decided to leave the Harris article's title alone, even though the Lieb article claims Lieb's technique was developed first, because the Harris article has been on Wikipedia longer and is larger than the Lieb article (implying, it seemed to me, more interest/use/importance of that approach). Mo Tat 2013opposes that change, and requests that the page be moved back to "(IL)." Thoughts? I apologize if I shouldn't have gone ahead with the move. —Ignatzmicetalkcontribs22:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – 2015 and beyond in film → 2015 in film – Having a film year "and beyond" article is pointless; if we already HAVE RELIABLE RESOURCES for films in multiple future years. It's just going to be split later anyway. Let's maintain histories and use a consistent article naming scheme. — AMK152(t • c)01:57, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Breakup of AT&T → Breakup of the Bell System – Most of the companies that were part of the Bell System continued to exist after the breakup. They were simply no longer connected through the Bell System. As an example, SNET, which AT&T only had a minority share in (and hence did not own), provided local service for most of Connecticut. Through the Bell System, it was able to provide long distance service outside of its own operating area. Especially in this case, it was not the "breakup of AT&T" because the local telephone operating company in question wasn’t even owned by AT&T. All of the little local Bell companies operated on their own, and even though many were owned by AT&T, not all of them were. What was fundamentally broken up here was the "system" by which all these companies were connected, both those owned by AT&T and those not owned by AT&T. As said before, the companies continued to exist, including AT&T. "Break-up" implies AT&T was destroyed through fragmentation, which wasn’t the case…there is just no way that the current title works…it is ambiguous and quite frankly incorrect. Furthermore, the claim that AT&T is a better known name than Bell is incorrect and ambiguous. There are two AT&Ts, old AT&T Corp and new AT&T Inc. (formerly Southwestern Bell, one of the RBOCS). These companies DO NOT have a direct corporate lineage. AT&T might be "better known" for the modern AT&T, but the old AT&T Corp is more often known as "Ma Bell" or "Bell" a derivative of the Bell System. Even if you disregard my arguments above, calling it "Breakup of the Bell System" removes ambiguity and makes it certain that one is referring to the old AT&T, which has absolutely nothing to do with the present company that uses that name. The current title muddles it up terribly. 138.16.102.4 (talk) 15:45, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Nissan Computer → Nissan Motors v. Nissan Computer – The Nissan Computer company itself is not notable, however the case filed against them by Nissan Motors is, hence this article should be move to the aforementioned title and the focal point of article should be changed to reflect the title. In order words, this article should be deleted as it doesn't meet notability guidelines and an article on the case regarding the subject should be created if someone is willing to put in the effort. Relisted. Favonian (talk) 12:36, 7 April 2013 (UTC). YuMaNuMaContrib08:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Gyalrongic languages → Rgyalrongic languages – The spelling "Rgyalrong" is the only one used in English by specialists of these languages. Although the consonant cluster may appear to be counterintuitive, it is really pronunced. "Rgyalrong" is a subbranch of "Rgyalrongic" in Jackson's Sun classification (which nobody challenges), and comprises four or five languages, not "dialects", so we also have to use the plural. Rgyalrongskad (talk) 08:18, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – AEG’s Turbine factory → AEG Turbine Factory – 'AEG Turbine Factory' was deleted for reasons unknown in 2005. Behren's AEG Turbine Factory is of great importance to the history of Western architecture and known by all students of the subject. New author has created a sourced article at 'AEG’s Turbine factory', presumably because of the previous deletion messages. However, the building is widely known as the AEG Turbine Factory and not 'AEG’s Turbine factory' Sionk (talk) 21:26, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Baileychromis → Baileychromis centropomoides – Genus is monotypic so all information currently germane to the species is also germane to the genus. However, should a new species in this genus be described, it will be easier to create a new genus page from a redirect than having to perform a cut and paste move to create a new species page Divingpetrel (talk) 20:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – William Allen Egan → ? – As with the previous RM, I developed the impression that the Alaska governor articles were all titled according to how they appear in one particular source. I originally thought that source was The Alaska Almanac. I've since consulted both a physical copy and Google Books, representing separate editions, and discovered my notion was incorrect. Despite my knowledge of Alaska, this is a matter in which I'm somewhat lacking in knowledge, as Egan was a retired elder statesman by the time I was growing up here. I can definitely state that Egan most certainly was not commonly known by his full name. It's completely a toss-up as to whether Egan was more commonly known as Bill EganorWilliam A. Egan (both of which redirect to the current article title). RadioKAOS – Talk to me, Billy 19:33, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Base 13 → Tridecimal – This way, the article is consistent with the neighbouring articles on bases, which use the numerical prefix nomenclature rather than the "Base x" nomenclature. (I'm not so sure about moving the higher ones, as their prefix names are not as transparent, but it looks odd to have "Base 13" between "duodecimal" and "tetradecimal". Double sharp (talk) 16:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Frank Burns (disambiguation) → Frank Burns – does not meet requirements for WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Fictional character who has a supporting role in well-known part of pop culture, but does not rise to the level of even having his own article---a very rare, if not unique, situation for a primary topic. Furthermore, in addition to pre-empting the name of real people named "Frank Burns", this placement prevents access to the disambiguation page, thus making it appear as if it is the only entry bearing this title. Unlike articles such as Charles Kane (business executive) (not be to be confused with the celebrated, though fictional, Charles Foster Kane) which wears the (unnecessary) hatnote, "For other persons with this name, see Charles Kane (disambiguation)", or even an article for one of the other "Franks named Burns", Frank R. Burns, whose (again unnecessary) hatnote states, "For other people named Frank Burns, see Frank Burns (disambiguation)", the putative primary topic, Frank Burns, which does not even have its own dedicated article, is missing [as of this writing] such a hatnote which would need to be awkwardly placed below the mid-page sub-header "Frank Burns" at the List of M*A*S*H characters article, otherwise users searching for direct access to Frank Burns (politician), Frank Burns (rugby league) and Frank R. Burns would not know that the Frank Burns (disambiguation) page even exists, thus making it unnecessarily difficult to access those articles. —Roman Spinner(talk)(contribs)05:38, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Aulonocranus → Aulonocranus dewindti – Being monotypic article should be under genus name. As it stands currently, any information applicable to the genus will also apply to the species. Having this information in the species article rather than the genus article also makes creation of a genus article should another species be described much easier and not require a cut-and-paste move. Divingpetrel (talk) 04:04, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Cessna 350 → Cessna 350 Corvalis – Official name and WP:COMMONNAME. Some time after the kerfuffle above, the aircraft naming standards were modified, and now the general standard is the most common name, including manufacturer+designation/model number+name where appropriate. In this case, the commoname also appears to be "Cessna 350 Corvalis". In the examples given above not all 172s were Skyhawks and not all 182s were Skylanes, so those names would be inappropriate, however all 350s are Corvalises, so including the name here allows it to conform with the accepted, consensus standard for aircraft page names. Note that I would have simply WP:BOLDly moved this page per the current standards, but given the past kerfuffles about including "Corvalis" in the name, thought discussion was appropriate. The BushrangerOne ping only00:36, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Italian Campaign (World War I) → Italian Front – The primary usage of the proposed title is in reference to this campaign. The current title has the look of having been forced into conformity with Italian Campaign (World War II), but while the term "Italian campaign" is the normal way of referring to the WWII campaign, the term "Italian front" predominates for WWI. A hatnote can take care of the ambiguity issue easily. Srnec (talk) 22:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Mottrom D. Ball → M. D. Ball – Sources conflict as to how his first name is really spelled. I get the impression that the Alaska governor articles were all titled strictly based on how they appear in the governor's list found in The Alaska Almanac(I still believe that the titling was based upon one particular source. I've since consulted both a physical copy and Google Books, representing separate editions of The Alaska Almanac, and discovered that it was not the culprit). I've seen his name written as "Mottrom", "Mottram" and "Mottrone" across various retrospective sources. Even R. N. DeArmond, arguably one of the most knowledgeable authorities on this particular era in Alaska's history, used all three spellings in different works. Contemporary sources almost universally refer to him by his initials. There is a caveat there, as it was common then for people in his position to be publicly referred to only by their initials. RadioKAOS – Talk to me, Billy 22:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Yannis Grivas → Ioannis Grivas – In Greek language use, politicians are (or at least were, until a few years ago) rarely known with colloquial forms of their names like "Yannis", unless they themselves favour this usage (like Costas SimitisorYiannos Papantoniou). Grivas, being a somewhat older-generation gentleman and a supreme court judge to boot, certainly never ever used "Giannis" in an official capacity, regardless of what the Schenectady Gazette, referenced in this article, seems to think on the matter. To wit, "Yannis Grivas" in Greek brings up athletes, coaches and a number of Facebook profiles first, while "Ioannis Grivas" brings almost only bios or references to the cabinet of this article's subject. Constantine ✍ 18:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Woo Hoo → Woo-Hoo (Rock-A-Teens song) – These two songs are too closely titled, and the original Woo Hoo (disambiguation) too generic and too much variation for two standalone singles titles depending on a hyphen or a cap to be stable/helpful disambiguation; therefore both articles currently fail #1 and #3 of WP:NAMINGCRITERIA. The original 1959 Woo-Hoo has been re-recorded many times, and the Japanese girl band version in Tarantino's Kill Bill and UK Carling beer advert/singles chart is reported with WooHooWoo-HooWoo HooWoohoo... all of which should redirect to Woo Hoo (disambiguation). However removing "(disambiguation)" from the disamb in itself isn't helpful since, given the different spellings, that helps people wanting the two singles avoid it. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:05, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – 2005 Kashmir earthquake → 2005 Pakistan earthquake – The name of the article is misleading because this earthquake occurred inside the state of Pakistan (in the heart of Pakistan, which affected Pakistan's capital Islamabad), Kashmir is not a country and only few people know of that region and its location. 80,000 Pakistanis were killed by this earthquake and 100,000 more Pakistanis were injured, and massive damage was done to Pakistan's infrastructure. An event like this should be recognized by country unless more than one earthquake occurred in the same country in the same year. This is part of Pakistan's history. Plus, majority sources named it 2005 Pakistan earthquake and should be the same here, the same as 2010 Haiti earthquake. The epicenter was Muzaffarabad, which sits inside Pakistan. 39.41.66.187 (talk) 00:31, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – 2013 International V8 Supercars Championship → 2013 V8 Supercars Championship – In 2011 the V8 Supercars were given the "international" category by the FIA, some people have interpreted that it makes the V8 Supercars Championship name change to "International V8 Supercars Championship". While International V8 Supercars Championship is used in some media, V8 Supercars Championship is still used by a number of media outlets (including the broadcast rights holder) and by the V8 Supercars. Prisonermonkeys (talk·contribs) has ignored the very V8 Supercars source, the fact that I've point at WP:COMMONNAME and continues to use the FIA "rules". The three articles should be moved back to "20xx V8 Supercars Championship", inline with the V8 Supercars and media's use of the far more common name, unless someone show/demonstrate that "International V8 Supercars Championship" is widely used. Relisted. BDD (talk) 21:21, 4 April 2013 (UTC) Bidgee (talk) 06:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Bortle Dark-Sky Scale → Bortle scale – Per the closing advice of the first RM above, I've revising the proposed new name and starting a new RM. This scale is widely referred to by various names, including very commonly "Bortle scale". A large number of the instances of "Bortle Dark-Sky Scale" in books are references to Bortle's paper title "Introducing the Bortle Dark-Sky Scale", which is usually but not always capitalized. Based on the diversity of things it's called, and lowercasing, there's little evidence that there's a proper name here. Might as well go with the concise generic term used in about 50 books. With wiki-mirror books excluded, few books use the full expression. Dicklyon (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Viṣṇu Smṛti → Vishnu Smriti – To be in line with most other entries e.g. Vishnu, Shiva etc. Also to be in line with WP MOS - The National Library at Kolkata, Romanization, intended for the romanisation of all Indic scripts; is an extension of IAST. Also the Hamari Boli initiative aims for a reunified Hindu/Urdu written using the Roman alphabet. Iztwoz (talk) 17:54, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Silenes → Disilene – The article is titled 'silene' however the text concerns only 'disilenes'. Silenes are compounds containing Si=C double bonds and disilenes are compounds with Si=Si double bonds. The article is thus incorrectly titled and/or the text of the article is wrong. For examples of correct naming of silenes/disilenes see Fischer, R. C. & Power, P. P. π-Bonding and the Lone Pair Effect in Multiple Bonds Involving Heavier Main Group Elements: Developments in the New Millennium.Chemical Reviews 110, 3877–3923 (2010). (section 3.7 defines silenes DangerousMike (talk) 16:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Non-stop flight → Nonstop flight – The prefix non does not typically need a hyphen. The phrase "nonstop flight" is much more common in books than "non-stop flight", according to google n-grams. The hyphen is distracting here, serving no real purpose. Though hyphens with "non" are somewhat more common in British English, this one is about 50/50, and even The Economist says not to. Dicklyon (talk) 16:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Arnott's Biscuits Holdings → Arnott's – Arnott's is the common name but it shares it with a department store in Ireland and Scotland. Can we determine if the biscuit company is indeed the more sort after article? It should be noted that their official name is actually "Arnott's Biscuits Limited" now. AnimatedZebra (talk) 16:12, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – KIL Toppfotball → Kongsvinger IL Toppfotball – The club's formal name is Kongsvinger IL Toppfotball, while the WP:COMMONNAMEisKongsvinger IL. The problem is that Kongsvinger IL is an article about the parent multi-sports club, while this article is about the elite men's football team. Kongsvinger IL Toppfotball might too long for an article-title, and this was shortened to "KIL Toppfotball" in the past, which is used by some sources, and I am open for other suggestions than mine. It might be better to shorten the last part of the article-name to Kongsvinger IL TForKongsvinger TF, as the club is most known as "Kongsvinger" or "Kongsvinger IL", but "Kongsvinger" should definitely be included in the article title. I don't know if "TF" is a appropriate abbreviation for "Toppfotball, as it can also mean "TurnForening", but I do know that some sources shortens Strømsgodset IF's elite football-section『Strømsgodset Toppfotball』to Strømsgodset TF. Mentoz86 (talk) 11:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – M Camelopardalis → HD 49878 – These names seem to be the most common names for the stars in question. Since latin letter bayer designations are exempt from the first clause of WP:NCASTRO as a result of a discussion on talk:HR 3803 and the fact that the current title designations are almost never used according to Google Scholar search results, these pages should be renamed to their HD designations per WP:NCASTRO. (One note about Google Scholar searches: although the HR designations gave more results, nearly all of them were completely irrelevant to the stars and were only incidental.) StringTheory11 (t • c) 22:13, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – The Inner Light (song) → The Inner Light – Not only is this Beatles song more notable than all other entries on the dab, it's also the only one called The Inner Light. Since most of the entries are rather generic derivatives of the term "inner light", they should be at that title, and this song article would then contain a hatnote link to the dab. Relisted. BDD (talk) 17:04, 1 April 2013 (UTC) The Evil IP address (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – EMI → EMI Group – The former EMI Group is not a sufficiently dominant main topic for the EMI name, vis a vis other entities such as the continuing EMI Records and EMI Music Publishing (each of which are also commonly known as simply "EMI"). Moving to EMI Group will also provide greater clarity for readers and editors that this article is about the defunct holding company Rangoon11 (talk) 15:36, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Your Body (Christina Aguilera song) → Your Body – Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC: Aguilera's song was viewed 58,605 in the last 90 days, while the Pretty Ricky song was viewed 1838 times in the same period. Since there are only two songs named "Your Body" with Wikipedia articles, it shouldn't be a problem giving Aguilera's more prominent song the plain title, with a hatnote referring readers to the other one in the event that this isn't their sought-after topic. WikiRedactor (talk) 18:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Daikon → White Radish – This article is naturally biased towards the Japanese varietal, even if the Japanese variety did not come first. To remove bias, White Radish is more neutral. I would also be open to mooli as it is a world wide term for the radish, whereas, "daikon" is mostly confined to the United States and Japan. Hitsuji Kinno (talk) 17:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Vučitrn → Vushtrri – move from Serbian name to Albanian name used by local population, following the increase in use of Albanian names in English WP:Reliable sources since the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence. [Initial reason: 17:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)] --Tëfcí (talk) 12:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Dodge SRT-4 → Dodge Neon SRT-4 – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Additionally, simply "Dodge SRT-4" leave vagueness since there has been the Dodge Neon SRT-4 & the Dodge Caliber SRT-4. A Google search for "Dodge Neon SRT-4" (with the quotes) returns 672,000 results, while "Dodge SRT-4" (with the quotes) 653,000 results with a lot of the titles of the websites on the pages actually saying "Dodge Neon SRT-4" instead of just "Dodge SRT-4". 「gu1dry」⊤ • ¢08:43, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Biocentrism (theory of everything) → Biocentrism (metaphysics) – There has already been a discussion about appropriate article name, or, more precisely, what should be in the parentheses. The "metaphysics" wasn't one of the proposals and it would be better than "theory of everything" because this article is about a metaphysical concept and there is no ambiguity which would be with "philosophy". The "theory of everything" is misleading, because it might imply that this is about a candidate for the theory of everything (and it is also a bit clumsy compared to the "metaphysics"). 93.136.16.90 (talk) 10:53, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Orders, decorations, and medals of Australia → Australian honours system – The page Orders, decorations, and medals of Australia addresses more topics and issues than just the "Orders, decorations, and medals of Australia". In particular, it covers: the history, background, and evolution of; the rationale for; and the operation of, the "Australian Honours System". (See below for more information.) Rather than simply move the page, this proposal is being made for two reasons: 1) To gain concensus for the move, and 2) (Because the target page already exists as a redirect to this page), the move requires an admin to perform it. Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 10:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC) Pdfpdf (talk) 12:23, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Langley, British Columbia (city) → Langley City – Because Langley City and Langley Township are geographically adjacent, they are quite often referred to as such; a simple Google Books or Google Scholar search demonstrates the usage. The article titles as they currently stand are both unsightly and confusing; it is difficult for an uninitiated person to determine whether it is Langley or British Columbia to which the parenthetical disambiguator refers. Furthermore, our policy on how to decide on an article title states that conciseness should be sought after; "Langley City" is much more concise than "Langley, British Columbia (city)". Neelix (talk) 04:23, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – She Wolf (album) → She Wolf – In regards to the album, She Wolf the album was viewed 40,348 times in the last 90 days; she-wolf the animal was viewed 2563 times in the same time period. In regards to the song, Shakira's "She Wolf" was viewed 11,432 times; the 1997 song was viewed 487 times. In both cases, Shakira's material is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, at the very least with the spelling of "She Wolf" without a hyphen. The album doesn't need the parenthetical disambiguation, and the song is the more prominent of the two and doesn't need to be further clarified with her name. WikiRedactor (talk) 19:25, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Dot the i → Dot the I – per WP:COMMONNAME, MOS:CAPS, WP:NCCAPS… From a quick Google search, while there are some reliable sources that call this movie dot the i, it appears that Dot the I and Dot The I are more commonly used, so our title should simply follow our MOS. If it’s here under WP:COMMONNAME, it shouldn’t be; the current capitalization does not appear to be prevalent in common use, and in fact many sources, including this article’s External Links, capitalize the letter. Frungi (talk) 20:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Cleveland School massacre → Cleveland Elementary School shooting (Stockton) – The current article title is wrong for several reasons. It does not meet NPOV titling requirements; it is confusing because it implies that the shooting occurred in Cleveland, Ohio; the school's name is "Cleveland Elementary School", not "Cleveland School"; and it's not the only shooting to have occurred at a school named "Cleveland Elementary School" in the state of California. Relisted again. Jenks24 (talk) 08:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC) Relisted. BDD (talk) 17:18, 19 March 2013 (UTC) Horologium(talk)17:20, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Beet → Beta vulgaris – Redirect the current title, BeettoBeetroot. This article is about a plant species that produces several edible products, including a root vegetable called Beet (US English) or Beetroot (UK English). Beet is ambiguous, referring either to the root vegetable, or the species as a whole. WP:FLORA generally supports using the scientific name as a title and this guideline is endorsed by the WP:AT policy at WP:MOSAT. The species is a whole is generally not discussed outside of a botanical context, where the scientific name would be appropriate. The vast majority of incoming links to this article use beet in a context where it is clear that the root vegetable, not the species, is the intended subject. Beet should redirect to Beetroot, and this article should be moved to the scientific name. Plantdrew (talk) 20:51, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]