|
→{{la|Jessie J}}: 3 months
|
→{{lat|China}}: Declined
|
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==== {{lat|China}} ==== |
==== {{lat|China}} ==== |
||
'''Semi-protection:''' various anon IPs repeatedly modifying headings, refactoring other editors' comments otherwise disrupting the working of the talk page repeatedly trying to restart closed discussions. <small>[[User:JohnBlackburne|JohnBlackburne]]</small><sup>[[User_talk:JohnBlackburne|words]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/JohnBlackburne|deeds]]</sub> 15:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC) |
'''Semi-protection:''' various anon IPs repeatedly modifying headings, refactoring other editors' comments otherwise disrupting the working of the talk page repeatedly trying to restart closed discussions. <small>[[User:JohnBlackburne|JohnBlackburne]]</small><sup>[[User_talk:JohnBlackburne|words]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/JohnBlackburne|deeds]]</sub> 15:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
:{{RFPP|d|because it looks like this was going on regularly, but it appears to have stopped for now. Please re-report if disruption continues.}} [[User:Ioeth|Ioeth]] <small>([[User talk:Ioeth|talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Ioeth|contribs]] [[WP:TW|twinkle]])</small> 17:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
===={{la|The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim}}==== |
===={{la|The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim}}==== |
||
'''Semi-protect'''. Continued High level of IP vandalism, page has been protected before as soon as protection comes off vandalism and excessive IP vandals return. Lots of un-sourced information also being input which creates more work for others. Request another 30 day semi-protect with consideration for possibly longer. [[User:0pen$0urce|0pen$0urce]] ([[User talk:0pen$0urce|talk]]) 14:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC) |
'''Semi-protect'''. Continued High level of IP vandalism, page has been protected before as soon as protection comes off vandalism and excessive IP vandals return. Lots of un-sourced information also being input which creates more work for others. Request another 30 day semi-protect with consideration for possibly longer. [[User:0pen$0urce|0pen$0urce]] ([[User talk:0pen$0urce|talk]]) 14:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
|
| |
|---|---|
Wikipedia's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
| General |
|
| Articles and content |
|
| Page handling |
|
| User conduct |
|
| Other |
|
| Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page | ||
|
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism. Unsourced additions. -- Luke (Talk) 17:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:11, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Temporary semi-protection: - Ip vandalism going on.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:38, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. -- Luke (Talk) 16:16, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection: various anon IPs repeatedly modifying headings, refactoring other editors' comments otherwise disrupting the working of the talk page repeatedly trying to restart closed discussions. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 15:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle) 17:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Semi-protect. Continued High level of IP vandalism, page has been protected before as soon as protection comes off vandalism and excessive IP vandals return. Lots of un-sourced information also being input which creates more work for others. Request another 30 day semi-protect with consideration for possibly longer. 0pen$0urce (talk) 14:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 15:50, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism - all appearing to be the same user however when banned they simply return with a different IP MattKitty (talk) 13:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much vandalism over a long period of time; I've hesitated to come to RPP again, but here I am; do protect for an extended period of time if possible, since the vandalism is persistent over a long period of time. Lynch7 07:13, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. After looking at the protection log, I don't see any reason to make this protection of finite duration. At some point in the far future, if someone thinks that there hasn't been a lot of problems on the talk page, unprotection can be tried, but to me it doesn't make sense to protect for another year, then let people suffer through a month of IP disruption, just to reprotect it again. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:56, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – LTA, and a DDOS threat. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:01, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Full protection except for editing by 68.173.113.106: This is an archive of old messages to me, as of 1 December 2011. These messages should not be touched in any way. Cheers, The Doctahedron, 16:16, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question: It is impossible to lock pages so that only one user can edit them. I can, however, protect it so only administrators can edit it (which they won't). Is that what you want? Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Semi or full protection would both prevent 68.173.113.106 from editing their own page, which is pointless Jac16888 Talk 15:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Why do I care if I can't edit the page? They're old topics, and no one, not even me or any admin, should touch them. If I wanted them deleted, I wouldn't have created the page in the first place. But I'm worried that deleting talk page messages might be an infraction of a WikiPolicy that I don't know about, resulting in my being banned for no reason. So please reconsider protecting this page. Cheers, The Doctahedron, 16:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Unprotection: No significant vandalism while on pending changes, has some references now and so unprotection seems worth a try, protecting admin seems fairly busy so I didn't want to bother him. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 11:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
{{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.{{Edit COI}} template should be used.Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – long-term test edit disruption. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. --slakr\ talk / 06:25, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Asking for semi-protection for this redirect and the redirect The JumpArounds due to persistent recreation of The Fresh Beat Band at this location by numerous new accounts - new article comes complete with hidden spam link. NellieBly (talk) 04:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. --slakr\ talk / 06:32, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced speculation and vandalism. -- Luke (Talk) 02:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --slakr\ talk / 06:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Semi-protection: On and off vandalism for several months now.—Ryulong (竜龙) 04:09, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Slon02 (talk) 04:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Semi-protection: BLP vandalism.—Ryulong (竜龙) 04:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 04:32, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
