Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases. The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here).
This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.
Do not request that pages deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11orG12 be undeleted here.
I wasn't aware of this articles attempted deletion until receiving an email that the article may have been the subject of a wikipedia related scam. Upon checking wikipedia I saw that instead this article was "soft-deleted" and was given an explanation of...
"despite being flagged for improvement for nearly a decade now, the article still has major issues. much of the article seems to be either original research, or things Matt has been only involved with tangentially (like stars his coworkers at the company represented). this could be improved if the article met WP:BIO, but even that seems doubtful. Free Realist 9 (talk) 13:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)".
I'd like the opportunity to make the necessary changes to the page so that it lives up to the guidelines set forth by wikipedia.
However, as this would be eligible for deletion immediately upon its restoration, I have chosen to instead draftify it as Draft:Matt Hannaford. This will provide you the time and space to address the issue(s) raised in the deletion discussion. When you have done so, please do not move this into main article space yourself, but instead submit it for further review. - UtherSRG(talk)18:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draftorArticles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @Celebrate Muru:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)20:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mreeyore:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)20:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)20:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@KenDevine1980:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)20:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Ccaan, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Ccaan (talk) 20:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ccaan:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412T21:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@FloridaArmy:Done – as a draftorArticles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T21:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@FloridaArmy:Done – as a draftorArticles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T21:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Thriley:Done – as a draftorArticles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T21:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@HenriHa:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. UtherSRG(talk)11:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Qetuadgjzcbm:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)11:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm EJ HerStorians, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. This is a profile of Kamiar Mohaddes. Thank you. EJ HerStorians (talk) 14:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@EJ HerStorians:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
@Thriley:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. UtherSRG(talk)20:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The page was left unattended for more than 6 months while the death of my brother, and other family issues made it impossible for me to work on the text. Now, I am ready to work on it again. I have gathered very strong verifiability materials, including Judge Kohler's appointment by President Kennedy and her publication of three lead articles on the Saturday Evening Post; and much more - which I am happy to share. So please return the article to me so that I can work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henrybardklein (talk • contribs) 19:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Henrybardklein:Not done – a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist.
@UtherSRG: it looks like there was a previous version (mostly written by Henrybardklein) that was deleted in April. Henrybardklein recreated the page just today, but the revisions pre-April remain deleted. The deleted version has more text and references. I'm just checking that you don't object to the older revisions being undeleted too, for some reason I didn't think about. Floquenbeam (talk) 20:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Henrybardklein:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)21:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This article was Soft deletedatWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capture of Peshawar (1758). The editor who nominated it for deletion argued that it did not pass WP:GNG[1] but it actually does pass it.
WP:GNG deals with following points mentioned below I have explained how this article passes every point.
1.) "Presumed" It's not an assumption but a fact as per the sources cited in the article (I have mentioned the sources in 4th point). Moreover it does require its own article as it helps to demonstrate the territorial peak of Maratha Confederacy which was in 1758 just after the capture of Peshawar Fort. Also it helps to understand the regional history of Peshawar which you could see as it has been included in History of Peshawar Wiki article.
2.) "Significant coverage" It does have significant coverage not just in one or two WP:RS but almost every WP:RS which deals with Maratha history or Afghan-Maratha wars, etc. Even various news articles including The Times of India have covered this event see this link; [2]
3.) "Reliable" As told before it's supported by multiple WP:RS sources. And as per the the wiki guidelines availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability.
4.) "Sources" All the below sources are considered reliable WP:RS.
i.) Advanced Study in the History of Modern India 1707-1813 - Jaswant Lal Mehta - Google Books link [3] pg 237 quoting; Thus nature did provide a golden opportunity to the Marathas to establish their sway over whole of Punjab and northwest India, upto Attock and Khyber pass, although the spell of their rule proved very shortlived.
ii.) Pletcher, Kenneth (2010). The History of India link [4] pg 198 quoting; Thus in 1757 Ahmad Shah's son Timur, appointed governor of Punjab, was forced to retreat from Lahore to Peshawar under the force of attacks from Sikhs and Marathas.
iii.) Pradeep Barua,The state at war in South Asia link [5]page 55; quoting: The Marathas attacked soon after and, with some help from the Sikhs, managed to capture Attock, Peshawar, and Multan between April and May 1758.
iv.) The Marathas - Cambridge History of India (Vol. 2, Part 4) : New Cambridge History of India link [6] pg 132 quoting: First, we shall look at the expanding areas controlled by the Marathas, and there were many. Maratha leaders pushed into Rajasthan, the area around Delhi, and on into the Punjab. They attacked Bundelkund and the borders of Uttar Pradesh. Further east, the Marathas attacked Orissa and the borders of Bengal and Bihar.
v.) Moreover, Govind Sardesai, New History of Marathas Vol 2, It has a whole chapter based on this article and conquest of Punjab by Marathas (See the below links) Above book Pg 400 link [7] quoting; At Lahore, therefore, Raghunath rao and his advisors found the situation easy and favourable. Abdussamad Khan who was a prisoner in Maratha hands, with characteristic double dealing offered to undertake the defence of frontier agasinst Abdali on behalf of the Marathas. From Poona the Peshwa dispatched Abdur Rahman with all haste to Lahore with instructions to Raghunath to make the best use of him in the scheme he was now executing- Raghunathrao, therefore, consigned the trans-Indus regions of Peshawar to these two Muslim agents, Abdur Rahman and Abdussamad Khan, posting them at Peshawar, with a considerable body of troops.
5.) "Independent of the subject" All the sources stated above are independent as it includes both Indian as well as foreign authors. All these sources are considered reliable (WP:RS). Advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not included in the sources (4th point).
So, it clearly does pass WP:GNG for which it was nominated for deletion. I did not participate in the deletion discussion as I was busy with some other stuff that time.
@Mohammad Umar Ali:Not done – a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist.
Has not been deleted. Please go to the deletion discussion where you can find links on how to participate in the discussion. A wall of text (as you posted here) will not help you in the discussion. - UtherSRG(talk)20:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SpudLad:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)22:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yazeed AlJa:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. UtherSRG(talk)23:03, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please undelete the following three The Outsiders character pages (Ponyboy Curtis, Johnny Cade and Dallas Winston) as the actors who played these three were up for Tony Awards this month for the stage musical adaptation and there is a ton of coverage, including interviews and reviews, regarding their portrayals that can be added to them. Like the novel and 1983 film, they are notable. —HM2021 (talk) 04:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have reviewed your comments regarding the deletion of Koimoi's Wikipedia page ([[8]]) and would like to share my observations and findings.
From your comments, I understand that you were unable to find authoritative sources citing Koimoi, which is why there were concerns regarding the authenticity of their information. I did a little bit of digging on the web and found some information you might find interesting.
Here are a few of the major publishers that refer to Koimoi:
Basis the above links, I believe a re-evaluation of the Koimoi Wiki page is in order. Please do let me know if the above sources suffice or if there are any other concerns.
@Tonton12:Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koimoi (3rd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Explicit (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. UtherSRG(talk)11:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm DareshMohan, and I would like to know what sources are in this draft. Optionally, I request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Optionally (not required), restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. DareshMohan (talk) 08:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DareshMohan:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)11:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
However, as this would be eligible for deletion immediately upon its restoration, I have chosen to instead draftify it as Draft:Georges Klenkle. This will provide you the time and space to address the issue(s) raised in the deletion discussion. When you have done so, please do not move this into main article space yourself, but instead submit it for further review. - UtherSRG(talk)11:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BeechWS:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)11:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}.
@AltruisticHomoSapien:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)12:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Thriley:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. UtherSRG(talk)15:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mach61:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)19:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm PiginToWorld, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. PinginToWorld (talk) 20:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PiginToWorld:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)21:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@LtPowers:Done – as a contested soft deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
However, as this would be eligible for deletion immediately upon its restoration, I have chosen to instead draftify it as Draft:Ferdinand Jay Smith III. This will provide you the time and space to address the issue(s) raised in the deletion discussion. When you have done so, please do not move this into main article space yourself, but instead submit it for further review. - UtherSRG(talk)21:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, but I'm afraid I don't know how to "fix" such nebulously defined issue(s). There seem to be sufficient sources within the article; it's not at all clear what else is missing. PowersT23:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@LtPowers: This was deleted for notability issues, specifically that the person is not notable outside the local area. If you can find sources that meet WP:SIRS that are outside of the local area, then you will likely be able to pass an AFC review. - UtherSRG(talk)00:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CTXPower:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412T22:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AdrianBoyko:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)00:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Samz73428091: Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. UtherSRG(talk)00:09, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Marceeloz:Done – as a draftorArticles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T04:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412T04:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Technimo:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412T04:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Worldexplorer34:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412T04:04, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. @Thriley:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draftorArticles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @Watercyclist:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Amitpnd22:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)10:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't use the form, so I don't know what article you are talking about. If you are talking about your user page, I will provide information on your talk page. - UtherSRG(talk)10:04, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Farooq Junaidi (talk) 10:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Farooq Junaidi, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD U5. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Farooq Junaidi (talk) 16:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Farooq Junaidi:Not done – this page was deleted in accordance with the criteria for speedy deletion. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, Fastily (talk·contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
@PJRHawkeye:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)14:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AleksandraKot94:Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. UtherSRG(talk)14:09, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm asking you again to put it in the sandbox because the text and links took me a lot of time yesterday and I would like to improve it based on what I have already created... 188.33.232.191 (talk) 18:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)14:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Loomchair:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)15:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Richard Bruce Bradford:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. UtherSRG(talk)16:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MizButlah:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)17:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@René Mario Micallef:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)17:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Mvolz, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! Mvolz (talk) 18:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mvolz:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. UtherSRG(talk)19:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Pegnawl, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13 (assuming it's any good). Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Pegnawl (talk) 22:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draftorArticles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @Pegnawl:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While this CFD discussion was lightly attended, like most CFD discussions, I think this category could be tagged for CSD G4 deletion as the decision wasn't ever overturned. Just adding my 2 cents. LizRead!Talk!01:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Wordcuh:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)20:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The page was earlier created by a sockpuppet and deleted under under CSD G5. I would like to request the undeletion of this article and restore it to draft space so that I can make changes to it and submit it for review. —61.3.224.58 (talk) 06:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The page was earlier created by a sockpuppet and deleted under under CSD G5. I would like to request the undeletion of this article and restore it to draft space so that I can make changes to it and submit it for review. —61.3.224.58 (talk) 06:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He is a prominent political figure in Sikkim and the leader of the Citizen Action Party-Sikkim.
@Bikashsaku:Done – as a contested soft deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
However, as this would be eligible for deletion immediately upon its restoration, I have chosen to instead draftify it as Draft:Ganesh Kumar Rai. This will provide you the time and space to address the issue(s) raised in the deletion discussion. When you have done so, please do not move this into main article space yourself, but instead submit it for further review. - UtherSRG(talk)14:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Danny4eve:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)17:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Leibowitz1959:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)17:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Trailblazer101:Done – as a non-free file deleted as orphaned, this has been restored upon request. Please note that the file needs to be de-orphaned within 7 days, otherwise it may be deleted again per CSD F5. Once the file is in use on an article, please remove the {{di-orphaned fair use}} tag. UtherSRG(talk)17:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 2600:1700:9F61:C800:F8E6:5946:49C2:571F (talk) 17:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Today 6/2024 I meant edit my own page because I can delete all that stuff I got a hold of the I æœ I looked up æ I think I pointed to me hellpp.[reply]
Draft was created but didn't add much content. IIRC, it was deleted on the 12th as a G13. I am planning to complete all my drafts and so I am requesting undeletion of the draft and userfying it to user:ToadetteEdit/Cairo Metro Line 4. Thanks for reviewing my application. ToadetteEdit!17:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ToadetteEdit:Done – as a draftorArticles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T19:04, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dsflyerds:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412T19:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@OliverOConnor77: Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. BD2412T19:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@HotMAN0199:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. UtherSRG(talk)22:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]