Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Market  





2 Largest aerospace companies  





3 Geography  



3.1  Cities  







4 Consolidation  





5 Suppliers  





6 Supply chain  





7 See also  





8 References  





9 Further reading  





10 External links  














Aerospace manufacturer






العربية

Català
Čeština
Cymraeg
Deutsch
Español
Esperanto
Euskara
فارسی
Français
Bahasa Indonesia
Interlingue
Italiano
עברית

Norsk bokmål
Occitan
Português
Română
Русский
کوردی
Svenska
Türkçe
Українська
Tiếng Vit
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




In other projects  



Wikimedia Commons
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


AnAirbus A321onfinal assembly line 3 in the Airbus plant at Hamburg Finkenwerder Airport
NASA's AIM (Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere) satellite, assembled in clean room

Anaerospace manufacturer is a company or individual involved in the various aspects of designing, building, testing, selling, and maintaining aircraft, aircraft parts, missiles, rockets, or spacecraft. Aerospace is a high technology industry.

The aircraft industry is the industry supporting aviation by building aircraft and manufacturing aircraft parts for their maintenance. This includes aircraft and parts used for civil aviation and military aviation. Most production is done pursuant to type certificates and Defense Standards issued by a government body. This term has been largely subsumed by the more encompassing term: "aerospace industry".

Market[edit]

In 2015 the aircraft production was worth US$180.3 billion: 61% airliners, 14% business and general aviation, 12% military aircraft, 10% military rotary wing and 3% civil rotary wing; while their MRO was worth $135.1 Bn or $315.4 Bn combined.[1]

The global aerospace industry was worth $838.5 billion in 2017: aircraft & engine OEMs represented 28% ($235 Bn), civil & military MRO & upgrades 27% ($226 Bn), aircraft systems & component manufacturing 26% ($218 Bn), satellites & space 7% ($59 Bn), missiles & UAVs 5% ($42 Bn) and other activity, including flight simulators, defense electronics, public research accounted for 7% ($59 Bn).[2] The countries with the largest industry were led by the United States with $408.4 Bn (49%), followed by France with $69 Bn (8.2%), then China with $61.2 Bn (7.3%), the United Kingdom with $48.8 Bn (5.8%), Germany with $46.2 Bn (5.5%), Russia with $27.1 Bn (3.2%), Canada with $24 Bn (2.9%), Japan with $21 Bn (2.5%), Spain with $14 Bn (1.7%) and India with $11Bn (1.3%). The top 10 countries represent $731 Bn or 87.2% of the whole industry.[2]

In 2018, the new commercial aircraft value is projected for $270.4 billion while business aircraft will amount for $18 billion and civil helicopters for $4 billion.[3]

Largest aerospace companies[edit]

By Revenue ($ billion)
Company 2022[4] 2019[5] 2018[6] 2017[7] 2016[8] 2015[9] 2014[10] Country
RTX Corporation 67.1  United States
Boeing[a] 66.6 76.6 101.0 93.4 94.6 96.1 90.8  United States
Lockheed Martin 66.0 59.8 53.8 51.0 47.2 40.5 45.6  United States
Airbus[a] 61.8 78.9 75.1 72.3 70.8 68.8 80.6  France Germany United Kingdom Spain
Northrop Grumman 36.6 33.8 30.1 25.8 24.5 23.5 24.0  United States
Rostec 30.0  Russia
BAE Systems 27.0 22.8 12.8 13.4 13.4 13.9 13.7  United Kingdom
GE Aerospace 26.1 30.6 27.4 26.3 24.7 24.0  United States
Safran 20.0 25.2 17.9 16.8 16.6 18.3  France
Rolls-Royce Holdings 17.2 15.0 12.7 12.0 13.2 14.7  United Kingdom
L3Harris 17.1  United States
Leonardo (Finmeccanica) 15.5 14.4 12.5 12.8 13.9 17.2  Italy
United Technologies[b] 46.9 36.0 30.9 29.0 33.1 36.2  United States
Raytheon Company[b] 27.1 25.3 24.1 23.2 22.8  United States
By Operating profit ($ billion)
Company 2022[4] 2019[5] 2018[6] 2017[7] 2016[8] 2015[9] 2014[10] Country
Lockheed Martin 8.35 8.55 7.33 5.90 5.55 4.71 5.59  United States
Airbus[a] 5.60 1.5 5.95 3.70 2.40 4.34 4.50  France Germany United Kingdom Spain
RTX Corporation 5.41  United States
GE Aerospace 4.78 6.47 6.64 6.12 5.51 5.00  United States
Northrop Grumman 3.60 3.97 3.78 3.30 3.19 3.08 3.20  United States
Rostec 3.18  Russia
Safran 2.06 3.43 2.58 2.54 1.71 2.74  France
L3Harris 1.27  United States
Leonardo (Finmeccanica) 0.87 0.59 0.90 1.05 0.94 0.72  Italy
Boeing[a] -3.55 -1.98 12.00 10.30 4.90 5.18 7.47  United States
BAE Systems - - - - - -  United Kingdom
Rolls-Royce Holdings 0.44 1.11 0.98 1.77 2.15  United Kingdom
United Technologies[b] 5.77 3.57 3.83 3.84 3.00 4.57  United States
Raytheon Company[b] 4.54 3.32 3.24 3.01 3.18  United States
  1. ^ a b c d In 2019, Airbus displaced Boeing as the largest aerospace company by revenue due to the Boeing 737 MAX groundings, with $2 billion operating losses down from $12 billion profits the previous year.[5]
  • ^ a b c d United Technologies merged with the Raytheon Company in April 2020 to form Raytheon Technologies (RTX Corporation).[11]
  • Geography[edit]

    In September 2018, PwC ranked aerospace manufacturing attractiveness: the most attractive country was the United States, with $240 billion in sales in 2017, due to the sheer size of the industry (#1) and educated workforce (#1), low geopolitical risk (#4, #1 is Japan), strong transportation infrastructure (#5, #1 is Hong Kong), a healthy economy (#10, #1 is China), but high costs (#7, #1 is Denmark) and average tax policy (#36, #1 is Qatar). Following were Canada, Singapore, Switzerland and United Kingdom.[12]

    Within the US, the most attractive was Washington state, due to the best Industry (#1), leading Infrastructure (#4, New Jersey is #1) and Economy (#4, Texas is #1), good labor (#9, Massachusetts is #1), average tax policy (#17, Alaska is #1) but is costly (#33, Montana is #1). Washington is tied to Boeing Commercial Airplanes, earning $10.3 billion, is home to 1,400 aerospace-related businesses, and has the highest aerospace jobs concentration. Following are Texas, Georgia, Arizona and Colorado.[12]

    In the US, the Department of Defense and NASA are the two biggest consumers of aerospace technology and products.[citation needed] The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States reported that the aerospace industry employed 444,000 wage and salary jobs in 2004, many of which were in Washington and California,[citation needed] this marked a steep decline from the peak years during the Reagan Administration when total employment exceeded 1,000,000 aerospace industry workers.[13]

    During that period of recovery a special program to restore U.S. competitiveness across all U.S. industries, Project Socrates, contributed to employment growth as the U.S. aerospace industry captured 72 percent of world aerospace market. By 1999 U.S. share of the world market fell to 52 percent.

    In the European Union, aerospace companies such as Airbus, Safran, BAE Systems, Thales, Dassault, Saab AB, Terma A/S, Patria Plc and Leonardo are participants in the global aerospace industry and research effort.

    InRussia, large aerospace companies like Oboronprom and the United Aircraft Corporation (encompassing Mikoyan, Sukhoi, Ilyushin, Tupolev, Yakovlev, and Irkut, which includes Beriev) are among the major global players in this industry.

    Cities[edit]

    Important locations of the civil aerospace industry worldwide include Seattle, Wichita, Kansas, Dayton, Ohio and St. Louis in the United States (Boeing), Montreal and Toronto in Canada (Bombardier, Pratt & Whitney Canada), Toulouse and Bordeaux in France (Airbus, Dassault, ATR), Seville in Spain and Hamburg in Germany (Airbus, EADS), the North-West of England and Bristol in Britain (BAE Systems, Airbus and AgustaWestland), Komsomolsk-on-Amur and Irkutsk in Russia (Sukhoi, Beriev), Kyiv and Kharkiv in Ukraine (Antonov), Nagoya in Japan (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Aerospace and Kawasaki Heavy Industries Aerospace), as well as São José dos Campos in Brazil where Embraer is based.[citation needed]

    Consolidation[edit]

    Several consolidations took place in the aerospace and defense industries over the last few decades.

    BAE Systems is the successor company to numerous British aircraft manufacturers which merged throughout the second half of the 20th century. Many of these mergers followed the 1957 Defence White Paper.[citation needed]

    Airbus prominently illustrated the European airliner manufacturing consolidation in the late 1960s.[14]

    Between 1988 and 2010, more than 5,452 mergers and acquisitions with a total known-value of US$579 billion were announced worldwide.[15]

    In 1993, then United States Secretary of Defense Les Aspin and his deputy William J. Perry held the "Last Supper" at the Pentagon with contractors executives who were told that there were twice as many military suppliers as he wanted to see: $55 billion in military–industry mergers took place from 1992 to 1997, leaving mainly Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon.[16] Boeing bought McDonnell Douglas for US$13.3 billion in 1996.[17] Raytheon acquired Hughes Aircraft Company for $9.5 billion in 1997.[18]

    Marconi Electronic Systems, a subsidiary of the General Electric Company plc, was acquired by British Aerospace for US$12.3 billion in 1999 merger,[19] to form BAE Systems.

    In 2002, when Fairchild Dornier was bankrupt, Airbus, Boeing or Bombardier declined to take the 728JET/928JET large regional jet program as mainline and regional aircraft manufacturers were split and Airbus was digesting its ill-fated Fokker acquisition a decade earlier.[14]

    On September 4, 2017, United Technologies acquired Rockwell Collins in cash and stock for $23 billion, $30 billion including Rockwell Collins' net debt, for $500+ million of synergies expected by year four.[20]

    Major aerospace and defence deals 2012-2018
    Target Buyer Closed U.S. Bn Ref
    Precision Castparts Berkshire Hathaway January 2016 37.2
    Rockwell Collins United Technologies November 2018 30.0
    Goodrich United Technologies July 2012 18.3
    Orbital ATK Northrop Grumman June 2018 9.2 [21]
    Sikorsky Lockheed Martin November 2015 9.0
    B/E Aerospace Rockwell Collins April 2017 8.6
    Alliant Techsystems' A&D Group Orbital ATK February 2015 5.0
    Exelis Inc. Harris Corp. May 2015 4.75
    Avio S.p.A. Aviation Business General Electric August 2013 4.3
    Titanium Metals Corp Precision Castparts December 2012 3.0
    Firth Rixson Alcoa July 2015 2.85

    The Oct. 16, 2017 announcement of the CSeries partnership between Airbus and Bombardier Aerospace could trigger a daisy chain of reactions towards a new order. Airbus gets a new, efficient model at the lower end of the narrowbody market which provides the bulk of airliner profits and can abandon the slow selling A319 while Bombardier benefits from the growth in this expanded market even if it holds a smaller residual stake. Boeing could forge a similar alliance with either Embraer with its E-jet E2orMitsubishi Heavy Industries and its MRJ.[22]

    On 21 December, Boeing and Embraer confirmed to be discussing a potential combination with a transaction subject to Brazilian government regulators, the companies' boards and shareholders approvals.[23] The weight of Airbus and Boeing could help E2 and CSeries sales but the 100-150 seats market seems slow.[24] As the CSeries, renamed A220, and E-jet E2 are more capable than their predecessors, they moved closer to the lower end of the narrowbodies. In 2018, the four Western airframers combined into two within nine months as Boeing acquired 80% of Embraer's airliners for $3.8 billion on July 5.[14]

    On April 3, 2020, Raytheon and United Technologies Corporation (except Otis Worldwide, leaving Rockwell Collins and engine maker Pratt and Whitney) merged to form Raytheon Technologies Corporation, with combined sales of $79 billion in 2019.[25]

    The most prominent unions between 1995 and 2020 include those of Boeing and McDonnell Douglas; the French, German and Spanish parts of EADS; and United Technologies with Rockwell Collins then Raytheon, but many mergers projects did not went through: Textron-Bombardier, EADS-BAE Systems, Hawker Beechcraft-Superior Aviation, GE-Honeywell, BAE Systems-Boeing (or Lockheed Martin), Dassault-Aerospatiale, Safran-Thales, BAE Systems-Rolls-Royce or Lockheed Martin–Northrop Grumman.[26]

    Suppliers[edit]

    The largest aerospace suppliers are United Technologies with $28.2 billion of revenue, followed by GE Aviation with $24.7 billion, Safran with $22.5 billion, Rolls-Royce Holdings with $16.9 billion, Honeywell Aerospace with $15.2 billion and Rockwell Collins including B/E Aerospace with $8.1 billion.[27] Electric aircraft development could generate large changes for the aerospace suppliers.[28]

    On 26 November 2018, United Technologies announced the completion of its Rockwell Collins acquisition, renaming systems supplier UTC Aerospace Systems as Collins Aerospace, for $23 billion of sales in 2017 and 70,000 employees, and $39.0 billion of sales in 2017 combined with engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney.[29]

    Supply chain[edit]

    Before the 1980s/1990s, aircraft and aeroengine manufacturers were vertically integrated. Then Douglas aircraft outsourced large aerostructures and the Bombardier Global Express pioneered the "Tier 1" supply chain model inspired by automotive industry, with 10-12 risk-sharing limited partners funding around half of the development costs. The Embraer E-Jet followed in the late 1990s with fewer than 40 primary suppliers. Tier 1 suppliers were led by Honeywell, Safran, Goodrich Corporation and Hamilton Sundstrand.[30]

    In the 2000s, Rolls-Royce reduced its supplier count after bringing in automotive supply chain executives. On the Airbus A380, less than 100 major suppliers outsource 60% of its value, even 80% on the A350. Boeing embraced an aggressive Tier 1 model for the 787 but with its difficulties began to question why it was earning lower margins than its suppliers while it seemed to take all the risk, ensuing its 2011 Partnering for Success initiative, as Airbus initiated its own Scope+ initiative for the A320. Tier 1 consolidation also affects engine manufacturers : GE Aerospace acquired Avio in 2013 and Rolls-Royce took control of ITP Aero.[30]

    See also[edit]

  • Aerospace industry in the United Kingdom
  • Military–industrial complex
  • Aircraft industry
  • Space industry
  • Supplier-furnished equipment
  • References[edit]

    1. ^ Kevin Michaels (April 28, 2016). "MRO Industry Outlook" (PDF). ICF International.
  • ^ a b Richard Aboulafia; Kevin Michaels (16 July 2018). "The Global Aerospace Industry Size & Country Rankings" (PDF). The Teal Group / AeroDynamic Advisory.
  • ^ Lee Ann Shay (Jan 2, 2018). "Commercial Spending Will Lead MRO Field In 2018". Aviation Week & Space Technology. Comparing civil, helicopter, business aviation and military MRO forecasts for 2018.
  • ^ a b Murdo Morrison (18 August 2023). "Top 100 aerospace companies ranked by revenue 2022". FlightGlobal.
  • ^ a b c Murdo Morrison (15 September 2020). "Airbus displaces Boeing as aerospace's biggest company". FlightGlobal.
  • ^ a b "Top 100 aerospace companies by revenue 2018" (PDF). Flight International. 3 Sep 2019.
  • ^ a b "Top 100 aerospace companies by revenue 2017". Flight International. 3 Sep 2018.
  • ^ a b "Top 100 aerospace companies grow more profitable". Flight International. 1 September 2017.
  • ^ a b "Top 100 Special Report". Flight International. 13 September 2016.
  • ^ a b "Top 100 Aerospace Companies" (PDF). Flight International. 15–21 September 2015.
  • ^ "United Technologies and Raytheon Complete Merger of Equals Transaction". www.rtx.com (Press release). Raytheon Technologies. 3 April 2020. Retrieved 3 April 2020.
  • ^ a b "Aerospace manufacturing attractiveness rankings" (PDF). PwC. September 2018.
  • ^ Parker, Dana T. Building Victory: Aircraft Manufacturing in the Los Angeles Area in World War II, pp. 131-2, Cypress, CA, 2013.
  • ^ a b c Jens Flottau (Jul 12, 2018). "Aerospace Consolidation Anew: Now It's The Commercial Airframers". Aviation Week & Space Technology.
  • ^ "Mergers & Acquisitions - Aerospace & Defense". Thomson Financial, Institute for Mergers, Acquisitions and Alliances.
  • ^ Leslie Wayne (Feb 27, 1998). "The Shrinking Military Complex; After the Cold War, the Pentagon Is Just Another Customer". New York Times.
  • ^ "Boeing offering $13 billion to buy McDonnell Douglas". New York Times. Dec 16, 1996.
  • ^ "Raytheon wins bidding war for Hughes Aircraft". Flight International. 22 January 1997.
  • ^ "All-UK merger sends European defence into disarray". Flight International. 27 January 1999.
  • ^ "United Technologies To Acquire Rockwell Collins For $30 Billion" (Press release). United Technologies. September 4, 2017.
  • ^ Michael Bruno (Sep 18, 2017). "Northrop To Buy Orbital For More Than $9B". Aviation Week & Space Technology.
  • ^ Jerrold T. Lundquist (Oct 18, 2017). "Opinion: C Series Deal Ends Aerospace Status Quo". Aviation Week & Space Technology.
  • ^ Michael Bruno and Guy Norris (Dec 21, 2017). "Boeing, Embraer Mull Combination That Could Reset OEM Industry". Aviation Week Network.
  • ^ Jon Hemmerdinger (6 June 2018). "Mergers may fuel long-awaited E2 and CSeries sales bump". Flightglobal.
  • ^ Jon Hemmerdinger (3 April 2020). "United Technologies-Raytheon merger to close today". Flightglobal.
  • ^ Murdo Morrison (9 April 2020). "Failed marriages: Top 10 aerospace mergers that never were". Flightglobal.
  • ^ Thierry Dubois and Jens Flottau (Jan 20, 2017). "Tier 1 Consolidation Continues As Safran Takes Over Zodiac". Aviation Week & Space Technology.
  • ^ Michael Bruno (Dec 6, 2017). "Industry Landscape Could Reboot Under Aircraft Electrification". Aviation Week & Space Technology.
  • ^ "United Technologies Announces Intention to Separate Into Three Independent Companies; Completes Acquisition of Rockwell Collins" (Press release). United Technologies. November 26, 2018.
  • ^ a b Kevin Michaels (May 18, 2017). "Beware, OEM-supplier Relations Are Changing". Aviation Week & Space Technology.
  • Further reading[edit]

    • Hartley, Keith. The Political Economy Of Aerospace Industries: A Key Driver of Growth and International Competitiveness? (Edward Elgar, 2014); 288 pages; the industry in Britain, continental Europe, and the US with a case study of BAE Systems.
  • Newhouse, John. The Sporty Game: The High-Risk Competitive Business of Making and Selling Commercial Airliners. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1982. ISBN 978-0-394-51447-5.
  • External links[edit]


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aerospace_manufacturer&oldid=1229368910"

    Categories: 
    Aerospace engineering
    Aerospace companies
    Aircraft industry
    Aerospace
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles with short description
    Short description matches Wikidata
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from January 2009
    Articles needing additional references from January 2023
    All articles needing additional references
    Articles with unsourced statements from January 2023
    Articles with unsourced statements from February 2021
    Articles with GND identifiers
    Articles with J9U identifiers
    Articles with LCCN identifiers
    Articles with NKC identifiers
    Articles with EMU identifiers
    Articles with NARA identifiers
     



    This page was last edited on 16 June 2024, at 12:19 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki