Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Joseph Smith biography  





2 Reception  





3 Publications  





4 Notes  





5 External links  














Dan Vogel






العربية
Deutsch
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Daniel Arlon Vogel (born 1955)[1] is an independent researcher, writer, and author on a number of works that include Joseph Smith: The Making of a Prophet and is most known for his work on early Mormon documents.

Joseph Smith biography[edit]

Vogel was awarded the Best Book award in September 2004 by the John Whitmer Historical Association and the Turner-Bergera Best Biography award by the Mormon History Association in May 2005 for his biography Joseph Smith: The Making of a Prophet.[2][3]

Vogel argues in the biography that Joseph Smith was a pious fraud—that Smith essentially invented his religious claims for what he believed were noble, faith-promoting purposes. Vogel identifies the roots of the pious fraud in the conflict between members of the Smith family, who were divided between the skepticism and universalism of Joseph Smith, Sr., and the more mainstream Protestant faith of Lucy Mack Smith. Vogel interweaves the history of Joseph Smith with interpretation of the Book of Mormon, which is read as springing from the young man's psychology and experiences.

Reception[edit]

In the LDS historical community, Vogel's work has received significant recognition. In 1997, Vogel received the "Best Documentary Editing/Bibliography Award" from the Mormon History Association for Volume 1 of Early Mormon Documents.[4] Vogel's 2004 biography of Joseph Smith received the highest award for such works from both the John Whitmer Historical Association and the Mormon History Association. LDS history journals have reviewed most of Vogel's publications. A typical summary: "Despite its idiosyncrasies, Early Mormon Documents remains the most useful collection of documents on the early movement available to researchers. Its unconventionality may actually magnify its importance, not diminish it."[5]

Vogel's scholarship on the topic has been debated by Mormon apologists and scholars who have stated that he is critical of Mormon faith claims.[6][7][8] He has also been criticized by ex-Mormons[who?] and anti-Mormons[who?] for not being sufficiently critical of Joseph Smith. Larry Morris praised his efforts to produce the multi-volume Early Mormon Documents.[9]

Many of Vogel's books have been critically reviewed by members of FARMS, a Mormon apologetics institute.[10] For example, in 1991, Mormon religion professor and FARMS scholar Stephen E. Robinson suggested that Vogel's naturalistic arguments closely resemble those of Korihor, an atheist polemicist in the Book of Mormon.[11]

Publications[edit]

As editor

Notes[edit]

  • ^ "JWHA Awards" Archived 2009-04-21 at the Wayback Machine
  • ^ "MHA 2005 Award Winners" Archived 2009-04-21 at the Wayback Machine
  • ^ Mormon History Association Past Award Recipients web page, accessed 14 May 2020.
  • ^ Review: Dan Vogel, Early Mormon Documents. Reviewed by Jed Woodworth. In Journal of Mormon History Vol. 34, No. 3, 2008, Page 242. Online at https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory/vol34/iss3/1. Accessed 14 May 2020.
  • ^ "Dan Vogel's Family Romance and the Book of Mormon as Smith Family Allegory"
  • ^ Neal, Rappleye; O., Smoot, Stephen (6 November 2018). "Book of Mormon Minimalists and the NHM Inscriptions: A Response to Dan Vogel". Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture. 8.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • ^ "Hales - Vogel - Joseph Smith's Polygamy".
  • ^ Morris, Larry. "Joseph Smith and "Interpretive Biography"". Dan Vogel has made a significant and lasting contribution to Mormon studies, and he deserves to be thanked for his bibliographic work. I sincerely appreciate his prodigious research.
  • ^ "FARMS reviews of Dan Vogel's works".
  • ^ Stephen E. Robinson, "Review of The Word of God: Essays on Mormon Scripture by Dan Vogel," FARMS Review of Books 3/1 (1991): 312–318. off-site
  • External links[edit]


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dan_Vogel&oldid=1216207189"

    Categories: 
    1955 births
    American biographers
    American atheists
    Former Latter Day Saints
    Historians of the Latter Day Saint movement
    Living people
    Mormon studies scholars
    American skeptics
    Hidden categories: 
    Webarchive template wayback links
    CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases
    Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from March 2013
    Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from September 2017
    Articles with ISNI identifiers
    Articles with VIAF identifiers
    Articles with BNF identifiers
    Articles with BNFdata identifiers
    Articles with LCCN identifiers
    Articles with SNAC-ID identifiers
     



    This page was last edited on 29 March 2024, at 18:50 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki