The film opens in 2010 with a frame story: Republican strategist Steve Schmidt is being interviewed by Anderson Cooper for 60 Minutes. Cooper poses a difficult question regarding former vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin: was she selected because she would make the best vice president or because she would win the election?
The story flashes back to Senator John McCain's 2008 presidential campaign, which is struggling to compete with other Republican candidates during the primary season. McCain asks Schmidt to reconsider his promise to sit the election out. Months later, Schmidt is serving as McCain's senior campaign strategist, which culminates in McCain winning the Republican nomination.
McCain's preferred running mate, Senator Joe Lieberman, is rejected by Schmidt and the majority of his senior advisers. They quickly look for a "game change" candidate who will excite the conservative base, win over independents, distance the campaign from the Bush administration and close the gender gap. Investigating prominent female Republican politicians, the campaign finds Palin, the governor of Alaska, to have the qualities they want. She is selected after an exceptionally brief vetting process. Palin's eventual public reveal creates the buzz that Schmidt and McCain were looking for, bringing them to even or better with Obama in the polls.
While Palin's acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention is well received, the campaign becomes concerned that she is ignorant about many political issues and grossly unprepared. Schmidt handles controversies from her past, such as Troopergate and the Bridge to Nowhere, while other staff attempt to fill broad gaps in her understanding of domestic and foreign politics. While prepping for the interviews, she is preoccupied with her approval ratings in Alaska and the absence of her family while campaigning, eventually becoming unresponsive to advisers who begin to question her mental state. Her disastrous interview with Katie Couric becomes a source of mockery in the media and frustration in the campaign. Palin lashes out at Nicolle Wallace, claiming that it was a deliberate attempt to embarrass her. Wallace tells Schmidt she is done with Palin.
The staff also comes to accept that Palin is better at memorizing and delivering lines than she is at actually understanding issues. Thus, they grudgingly prepare her for the vice presidential debate by simply having Palin memorize about forty minutes' worth of talking points, which manages to get her through the debate without major incident. However, Palin's growing popularity with the Republican base, even as she alienates mainstream voters, soon overshadows the campaign; Palin becomes uncooperative, rejecting – and conflicting with – Schmidt and the rest of the campaign staff as she gains her own following. Later on, with prospects appearing poor, the campaign staff boosts a negative campaign against Obama's past associations with the liberal elite, which Palin supports but McCain resists. McCain, meanwhile, becomes discouraged by the negative campaigning, watching growing hostility and vitriol emerge toward Obama among McCain's supporters. With Election Day approaching, senior campaigners express regret that Palin turned out to be style without substance, with Schmidt lamenting that they neglected to vet her competency. McCain consoles Schmidt by reaffirming that taking a risk with Palin was better than fading away.
When Obama wins on Election Night, Schmidt tries to stop a rebellious Palin from giving a concession speech along with McCain's. She appeals to McCain, who agrees with Schmidt. He tells Palin that she is now one of the party leaders and warns her not to let herself be hijacked by extremism. Rick Davis (McCain's campaign manager) comments that Palin will soon be forgotten. During McCain's concession speech, he thanks Palin, who receives enormous and sustained applause, chants, and enthusiasm from the crowd, which is noted in the faces of McCain's advisors. The film returns to the 2010 interview; regarding Cooper's question about whether he would pick Palin again if he had the chance to go back, Schmidt replies that life does not give do-overs.
HBO optioned the book Game Change, by John Heilemann and Mark Halperin, in January 2010.[3] In February 2011, development began with Danny Strong writing and Jay Roach directing. The two had collaborated as writer and director on the 2008 HBO film Recount, about the controversial result of the 2000 U.S. presidential election. Although Strong and Roach based the film on the part of the book dealing with the McCain–Palin campaign, they had also considered a film dealing with Obama's primary battle against Hillary Clinton – an idea ultimately dropped due to the length and complexity of that story, among other reasons.[4] Strong said he interviewed 25 people from the McCain–Palin campaign and referenced other books and articles, including Palin's memoir Going Rogue, in addition to the book on which the film was based.[5]
The main cast was announced in March 2011, starting with Julianne Moore as Palin,[6]Ed Harris as John McCain,[7] with Woody Harrelson, who plays McCain campaign chair Steve Schmidt, coming aboard soon thereafter.[8] The film was primarily shot in Maryland,[9] along with a hotel scene shot in Wilmington, Delaware.[citation needed] The film was also shot and produced in Albuquerque and Santa Fe, New Mexico.[10] The film premiered at the NewseuminWashington, D.C., on March 8 prior to its public debut on HBO on March 10, 2012.[11][12]
Principal photography began on April 27, 2011 and completed shooting on June 22, 2011.[13]
Game Change was watched by 2.1 million people on its debut night, which marked the highest ratings for an HBO original film since their 2004 film Something the Lord Made.[14]
Game Change received generally positive reviews, with 65% of the critics polled by Rotten Tomatoes giving it favorable reviews (based on 37 reviews), with an averaged score of 6.9 out of 10.[15]Metacritic lists the film as scoring 74 out of 100, based on 25 reviews by critics, signifying a "generally favorable" critical response.[16]
The Los Angeles Times wrote: "The overall atmosphere of the film is surprisingly kind to all, much more fatalistic than hypercritical and certainly not derisive. Palin's rise and fall is depicted as series of bad decisions made in relatively good faith that lead up to a hideous car crash."[23]Newsday commented: "Moore's performance ... is superb. ... A luminous and fully alive portrait by a first-rate actress."[24] The San Francisco Chronicle also praised the acting: "Game Change is graced by three extraordinary performances in the leading roles, beginning with Moore's portrayal of Palin, which is both complex and entirely credible."[25] The Boston Globe wrote: "Whether “Game Change’’ is a definitive accounting of what happened, and whether some viewers will accept it as such is unknowable. But from a dramatic standpoint is the film entertaining? You betcha."[26]
Palin herself said Game Change was based on a "false narrative" and that she did not intend to see it.[27] The film, and the book it is based upon, have been described by John and Cindy McCain as inaccurate.[28] Like Palin, McCain said he did not intend to see it,[14] and took issue with the "exceeding amount of coarse language" that was attributed to him in the film.[29] Many of Sarah Palin's campaign aides have criticized the accuracy of the film. Randy Scheunemann, who tutored Palin on foreign policy matters during the campaign, said: "To call this movie fiction gives fiction a bad name." According to her campaign staff, many had not been contacted by the filmmakers or the authors of the book on which it is based.[30]
However, Steve Schmidt, the campaign's chief strategist, stated: "Ten weeks of the campaign are condensed into a two-hour movie. But it tells the truth of the campaign. That is the story of what happened."[31] He later said that watching the film was tantamount to "an out-of-body experience."[32]
Nicolle Wallace, a chief Palin 2008 aide, said she found Game Change highly credible, saying the film "captured the spirit and emotion of the campaign."[31] Wallace also told ABC News Chief Political Correspondent George Stephanopoulos that the film was "true enough to make me squirm."[33] Both Wallace and Schmidt have had public feuds with Sarah Palin since the 2008 campaign ended.[30]
Melissa Farman, who played Bristol Palin, said it was never the film's intention to portray Sarah Palin in a negative light because the film was not meant to be about Palin, but about "politics at large" and what it means to be a politician in this era.[34]
^Game Change (Television production). C-SPAN. March 9, 2012. Event occurs at 6:30. Retrieved March 12, 2012. A forum interview feature Schmidt, Heilemann, Halperin, Roach, and Strong.
^Game Change (Television production). C-SPAN. March 9, 2012. Event occurs at 8:20. Retrieved March 12, 2012.
