Gethyllis and Apodolirion are two unifloral genera with fused spathe bracts that retain the ovary inside the bulbs until the fruit matures. In both the scape remains inside the bulbs. The fruit is large, fleshy, and aromatic with many seeds, and distinct from the rest of Haemantheae which have berry fruits with only a few seeds. These seeds are also small and hard, while the rest of Haemantheae have seeds that are larger, fleshy and water rich.
The genera are also distinguished from each other by their stigmata. In Gethyllis this is capitate, while in Apodolirion it is trifid. Also, Apodolirion has six stamina while Gethyllis has many more, with some species having 18 or more.[2]
For the early taxonomic history of these two genera, see Meerow and Clayton (2004).[2]Gethyllis was one of the two Hamantheae genera to be described (Linnaeus 1753),[4] and in 1829 Dumortier placed it in a monotypic higher taxon, tribe Gethyllideae,[1] and hence is given as the authority, a practice followed by Salisbury.[5]Baker described Apodolirion in 1878, noting the close resemblance to Gethyllis.[6]Pax (1888) then placed both genera in his subtribe Zephyranthinae, as one of six genera,[7] a practice followed by Hutchinson (1926), though at tribal rank.[8]
Traub recognised the distinct features of these two genera, for which he created the tribe Gethylleae in his 1963 monograph on the Amaryllidaceae, based on the type genusGethyllis.[3] He (amongst others) even expressed the idea that they might be a single genus. On the other hand, Dahlgren (1985) submerged them once again in Haemantheae.[9] Subsequently, the Müller-Doblies' restored Gethyllidinae as a tribe.[10] Later molecular phylogenetic research has shown that these two genera, while forming a monophyletic subclade, is situated as one of three subtribes of Haemantheae, since forming a separate tribe renders Haemantheae paraphyletic. Although the two genera are resolved in this process as distinct sister groups, the possibility that they may eventually be considered a single genus remains.[2][11]
Hutchinson, John (1926). The families of flowering plants, arranged according to a new system based on their probable phylogeny. Volume 1: Monocotyledonae (1st ed.). Macmillan. Volume 2: Dicotyledonae 1934.
Müller-Doblies, U.; Müller-Doblies, D. (1996). "Tribes and subtribes and some species combinations in Amaryllidaceae J St Hil R Dahlgren & al. 1985". Feddes Repertorium. 107 (5–6): S.c.1–S.c.9.
