Hafnium is used in filaments and electrodes. Some semiconductor fabrication processes use its oxide for integrated circuits at 45 nanometers and smaller feature lengths. Some superalloys used for special applications contain hafnium in combination with niobium, titanium, or tungsten.
Hafnium is a shiny, silvery, ductilemetal that is corrosion-resistant and chemically similar to zirconium[13] in that they have the same number of valence electrons and are in the same group. Also, their relativistic effects are similar: The expected expansion of atomic radii from period 5 to 6 is almost exactly canceled out by the lanthanide contraction. Hafnium changes from its alpha form, a hexagonal close-packed lattice, to its beta form, a body-centered cubic lattice, at 2388 K.[14] The physical properties of hafnium metal samples are markedly affected by zirconium impurities, especially the nuclear properties, as these two elements are among the most difficult to separate because of their chemical similarity.[13]
A notable physical difference between these metals is their density, with zirconium having about one-half the density of hafnium. The most notable nuclear properties of hafnium are its high thermalneutron capture cross section and that the nuclei of several different hafnium isotopes readily absorb two or more neutrons apiece.[13] In contrast with this, zirconium is practically transparent to thermal neutrons, and it is commonly used for the metal components of nuclear reactors—especially the cladding of their nuclear fuel rods.
Hafnium reacts in air to form a protective film that inhibits further corrosion. Despite this, the metal is attacked by hydrofluoric acid and concentrated sulfuric acid, and can be oxidized with halogens or burnt in air. Like its sister metal zirconium, finely divided hafnium can ignite spontaneously in air. The metal is resistant to concentrated alkalis.
As a consequence of lanthanide contraction, the chemistry of hafnium and zirconium is so similar that the two cannot be separated based on differing chemical reactions. The melting and boiling points of the compounds and the solubility in solvents are the major differences in the chemistry of these twin elements.[15]
At least 40 isotopes of hafnium have been observed, ranging in mass number from 153 to 192.[16][17][18] The five stable isotopes have mass numbers ranging from 176 to 180 inclusive. The radioactive isotopes' half-lives range from 400 ms for 153Hf[17]to7.0×1016 years for the most stable one, the primordial174Hf.[16][7]
Hafnium is estimated to make up about between 3.0 and 4.8 ppm of the Earth's upper crust by mass.[20]: 5 [21] It does not exist as a free element on Earth, but is found combined in solid solution with zirconium in natural zirconium compounds such as zircon, ZrSiO4, which usually has about 1–4% of the Zr replaced by Hf. Rarely, the Hf/Zr ratio increases during crystallization to give the isostructural mineral hafnon(Hf,Zr)SiO4, with atomic Hf > Zr.[22] An obsolete name for a variety of zircon containing unusually high Hf content is alvite.[23]
Melted tip of a hafnium consumable electrode used in an electron beamremelting furnace, a 1 cm cube, and an oxidized hafnium electron beam-remelted ingot (left to right)
The heavy mineral sands ore deposits of the titanium ores ilmenite and rutile yield most of the mined zirconium, and therefore also most of the hafnium.[25]
Zirconium is a good nuclear fuel-rod cladding metal, with the desirable properties of a very low neutron capture cross section and good chemical stability at high temperatures. However, because of hafnium's neutron-absorbing properties, hafnium impurities in zirconium would cause it to be far less useful for nuclear reactor applications. Thus, a nearly complete separation of zirconium and hafnium is necessary for their use in nuclear power. The production of hafnium-free zirconium is the main source of hafnium.[13]
The chemical properties of hafnium and zirconium are nearly identical, which makes the two difficult to separate.[26] The methods first used—fractional crystallization of ammonium fluoride salts[27] or the fractional distillation of the chloride[28]—have not proven suitable for an industrial-scale production. After zirconium was chosen as a material for nuclear reactor programs in the 1940s, a separation method had to be developed. Liquid–liquid extraction processes with a wide variety of solvents were developed and are still used for producing hafnium.[29] About half of all hafnium metal manufactured is produced as a by-product of zirconium refinement. The end product of the separation is hafnium(IV) chloride.[30] The purified hafnium(IV) chloride is converted to the metal by reduction with magnesiumorsodium, as in the Kroll process.[31]
Further purification is effected by a chemical transport reaction developed by Arkel and de Boer: In a closed vessel, hafnium reacts with iodine at temperatures of 500 °C (900 °F), forming hafnium(IV) iodide; at a tungsten filament of 1,700 °C (3,100 °F) the reverse reaction happens preferentially, and the chemically bound iodine and hafnium dissociate into the native elements. The hafnium forms a solid coating at the tungsten filament, and the iodine can react with additional hafnium, resulting in a steady iodine turnover and ensuring the chemical equilibrium remains in favor of hafnium production.[15][32]
Due to the lanthanide contraction, the ionic radius of hafnium(IV) (0.78 ångström) is almost the same as that of zirconium(IV) (0.79 angstroms).[33] Consequently, compounds of hafnium(IV) and zirconium(IV) have very similar chemical and physical properties.[33] Hafnium and zirconium tend to occur together in nature and the similarity of their ionic radii makes their chemical separation rather difficult. Hafnium tends to form inorganic compounds in the oxidation state of +4. Halogens react with it to form hafnium tetrahalides.[33] At higher temperatures, hafnium reacts with oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, boron, sulfur, and silicon.[33] Some hafnium compounds in lower oxidation states are known.[34]
Hafnium(IV) chloride and hafnium(IV) iodide have some applications in the production and purification of hafnium metal. They are volatile solids with polymeric structures.[15] These tetrachlorides are precursors to various organohafnium compounds such as hafnocene dichloride and tetrabenzylhafnium.
The white hafnium oxide (HfO2), with a melting point of 2,812 °C and a boiling point of roughly 5,100 °C, is very similar to zirconia, but slightly more basic.[15]Hafnium carbide is the most refractorybinary compound known, with a melting point over 3,890 °C, and hafnium nitride is the most refractory of all known metal nitrides, with a melting point of 3,310 °C.[33] This has led to proposals that hafnium or its carbides might be useful as construction materials that are subjected to very high temperatures. The mixed carbide tantalum hafnium carbide (Ta 4HfC 5) possesses the highest melting point of any currently known compound, 4,263 K (3,990 °C; 7,214 °F).[35] Recent supercomputer simulations suggest a hafnium alloy with a melting point of 4,400 K.[36]
Photographic recording of the characteristic X-ray emission lines of some elements
In his report on The Periodic Law of the Chemical Elements, in 1869, Dmitri Mendeleev had implicitly predicted the existence of a heavier analog of titanium and zirconium. At the time of his formulation in 1871, Mendeleev believed that the elements were ordered by their atomic masses and placed lanthanum (element 57) in the spot below zirconium. The exact placement of the elements and the location of missing elements was done by determining the specific weight of the elements and comparing the chemical and physical properties.[37]
The X-ray spectroscopy done by Henry Moseley in 1914 showed a direct dependency between spectral line and effective nuclear charge. This led to the nuclear charge, or atomic number of an element, being used to ascertain its place within the periodic table. With this method, Moseley determined the number of lanthanides and showed the gaps in the atomic number sequence at numbers 43, 61, 72, and 75.[38]
The discovery of the gaps led to an extensive search for the missing elements. In 1914, several people claimed the discovery after Henry Moseley predicted the gap in the periodic table for the then-undiscovered element 72.[39]Georges Urbain asserted that he found element 72 in the rare earth elements in 1907 and published his results on celtium in 1911.[40] Neither the spectra nor the chemical behavior he claimed matched with the element found later, and therefore his claim was turned down after a long-standing controversy.[41] The controversy was partly because the chemists favored the chemical techniques which led to the discovery of celtium, while the physicists relied on the use of the new X-ray spectroscopy method that proved that the substances discovered by Urbain did not contain element 72.[41] In 1921, Charles R. Bury[42][43] suggested that element 72 should resemble zirconium and therefore was not part of the rare earth elements group. By early 1923, Niels Bohr and others agreed with Bury.[44][45] These suggestions were based on Bohr's theories of the atom which were identical to chemist Charles Bury,[42] the X-ray spectroscopy of Moseley, and the chemical arguments of Friedrich Paneth.[46][47]
Encouraged by these suggestions and by the reappearance in 1922 of Urbain's claims that element 72 was a rare earth element discovered in 1911, Dirk Coster and Georg von Hevesy were motivated to search for the new element in zirconium ores.[48] Hafnium was discovered by the two in 1923 in Copenhagen, Denmark, validating the original 1869 prediction of Mendeleev.[8][49] It was ultimately found in zircon in Norway through X-ray spectroscopy analysis.[50] The place where the discovery took place led to the element being named for the Latin name for "Copenhagen", Hafnia, the home town of Niels Bohr.[51] Today, the Faculty of Science of the University of Copenhagen uses in its seal a stylized image of the hafnium atom.[52]
Hafnium was separated from zirconium through repeated recrystallization of the double ammoniumorpotassium fluorides by Valdemar Thal Jantzen and von Hevesey.[27]Anton Eduard van Arkel and Jan Hendrik de Boer were the first to prepare metallic hafnium by passing hafnium tetraiodide vapor over a heated tungsten filament in 1924.[28][32] This process for differential purification of zirconium and hafnium is still in use today.[13]
In 1923, six predicted elements were still missing from the periodic table: 43 (technetium), 61 (promethium), 85 (astatine), and 87 (francium) are radioactive elements and are only present in trace amounts in the environment,[53] thus making elements 75 (rhenium) and 72 (hafnium) the last two unknown non-radioactive elements.
Several details contribute to the fact that there are only a few technical uses for hafnium: First, the close similarity between hafnium and zirconium makes it possible to use the more abundant zirconium for most applications; second, hafnium was first available as pure metal after the use in the nuclear industry for hafnium-free zirconium in the late 1950s. Furthermore, the low abundance and difficult separation techniques necessary make it a scarce commodity.[13] When the demand for hafnium-free zirconium dropped following the Fukushima disaster, the price of hafnium increased sharply from around $500–600/kg in 2014 to around $1000/kg in 2015.[54]
The nuclei of several hafnium isotopes can each absorb multiple neutrons. This makes hafnium a good material for nuclear reactors' control rods. Its neutron capture cross section (Capture Resonance Integral Io ≈ 2000 barns)[55] is about 600 times that of zirconium (other elements that are good neutron-absorbers for control rods are cadmium and boron). Excellent mechanical properties and exceptional corrosion-resistance properties allow its use in the harsh environment of pressurized water reactors.[29] The German research reactor FRM II uses hafnium as a neutron absorber.[56] It is also common in military reactors, particularly in US naval submarine reactors, to slow reactor rates that are too high.[57][58] It is seldom found in civilian reactors, the first core of the Shippingport Atomic Power Station (a conversion of a naval reactor) being a notable exception.[59]
Small additions of hafnium increase the adherence of protective oxide scales on nickel-based alloys. It thereby improves the corrosion resistance, especially under cyclic temperature conditions that tend to break oxide scales, by inducing thermal stresses between the bulk material and the oxide layer.[61][62][63]
Hafnium-based compounds are employed in gates of transistors as insulators in the 45 nm (and below) generation of integrated circuits from Intel, IBM and others.[64][65] Hafnium oxide-based compounds are practical high-k dielectrics, allowing reduction of the gate leakage current which improves performance at such scales.[66][67][68]
In most geologic materials, zircon is the dominant host of hafnium (>10,000 ppm) and is often the focus of hafnium studies in geology.[73] Hafnium is readily substituted into the zircon crystal lattice, and is therefore very resistant to hafnium mobility and contamination. Zircon also has an extremely low Lu/Hf ratio, making any correction for initial lutetium minimal. Although the Lu/Hf system can be used to calculate a "model age", i.e. the time at which it was derived from a given isotopic reservoir such as the depleted mantle, these "ages" do not carry the same geologic significance as do other geochronological techniques as the results often yield isotopic mixtures and thus provide an average age of the material from which it was derived.
Garnet is another mineral that contains appreciable amounts of hafnium to act as a geochronometer. The high and variable Lu/Hf ratios found in garnet make it useful for dating metamorphic events.[74]
Due to its heat resistance and its affinity to oxygen and nitrogen, hafnium is a good scavenger for oxygen and nitrogen in gas-filled and incandescent lamps. Hafnium is also used as the electrode in plasma cutting because of its ability to shed electrons into the air.[75]
The high energy content of 178m2Hf was the concern of a DARPA-funded program in the US. This program eventually concluded that using the above-mentioned 178m2Hfnuclear isomer of hafnium to construct high-yield weapons with X-ray triggering mechanisms—an application of induced gamma emission—was infeasible because of its expense. See hafnium controversy.
A pyridyl-amidohafnium catalyst can be used for the controlled iso-selective polymerization of propylene which can then be combined with polyethylene to make a much tougher recycled plastic.[77]
Care needs to be taken when machining hafnium because it is pyrophoric—fine particles can spontaneously combust when exposed to air. Compounds that contain this metal are rarely encountered by most people. The pure metal is not considered toxic, but hafnium compounds should be handled as if they were toxic because the ionic forms of metals are normally at greatest risk for toxicity, and limited animal testing has been done for hafnium compounds.[79]
^ abArblaster, John W. (2018). Selected Values of the Crystallographic Properties of Elements. Materials Park, Ohio: ASM International. ISBN978-1-62708-155-9.
^"Two Danes Discover New Element, Hafnium – Detect It by Means of Spectrum Analysis of Ore Containing Zirconium", The New York Times, January 20, 1923, p. 4
^ abcHedrick, James B. "Hafnium"(PDF). United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2008-09-10.
^Griffith, Robert F. (1952). "Zirconium and hafnium". Minerals yearbook metals and minerals (except fuels). The first production plants Bureau of Mines. pp. 1162–1171.
^Gilbert, H. L.; Barr, M. M. (1955). "Preliminary Investigation of Hafnium Metal by the Kroll Process". Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 102 (5): 243. doi:10.1149/1.2430037.
^ abvan Arkel, A. E.; de Boer, J. H. (1925). "Darstellung von reinem Titanium-, Zirkonium-, Hafnium- und Thoriummetall (Production of pure titanium, zirconium, hafnium and Thorium metal)". Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie (in German). 148: 345–350. doi:10.1002/zaac.19251480133.
^Agte, C. & Alterthum, H. (1930). "Researches on Systems with Carbides at High Melting Point and Contributions to the Problem of Carbon Fusion". Z. Tech. Phys. 11: 182–191.
^ abKragh, Helge. "Niels Bohr's Second Atomic Theory." Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, vol. 10, University of California Press, 1979, pp. 123–186, https://doi.org/10.2307/27757389.
^Hevesy, G. (1925). "The Discovery and Properties of Hafnium". Chemical Reviews. 2: 1–41. doi:10.1021/cr60005a001.
^von Hevesy, Georg (1923). "Über die Auffindung des Hafniums und den gegenwärtigen Stand unserer Kenntnisse von diesem Element". Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft (A and B Series). 56 (7): 1503–1516. doi:10.1002/cber.19230560702. S2CID96017606.
^Scerri, Eric R. (1994). "Prediction of the nature of hafnium from chemistry, Bohr's theory and quantum theory". Annals of Science. 51 (2): 137–150. doi:10.1080/00033799400200161.
^C.W. Forsberg; K. Takase & N. Nakatsuka (2011). "Water Reactor". In Xing L. Yan & Ryutaro Hino (eds.). Nuclear Hydrogen Production Handbook. CRC Press. p. 192. ISBN978-1-4398-1084-2.
^Maslenkov, S. B.; Burova, N. N.; Khangulov, V. V. (1980). "Effect of hafnium on the structure and properties of nickel alloys". Metal Science and Heat Treatment. 22 (4): 283–285. Bibcode:1980MSHT...22..283M. doi:10.1007/BF00779883. S2CID135595958.
^Beglov, V. M.; Pisarev, B. K.; Reznikova, G. G. (1992). "Effect of boron and hafnium on the corrosion resistance of high-temperature nickel alloys". Metal Science and Heat Treatment. 34 (4): 251–254. Bibcode:1992MSHT...34..251B. doi:10.1007/BF00702544. S2CID135844921.
^US 6013553, Wallace, Robert M.; Stoltz, Richard A. & Wilk, Glen D., "Zirconium and/or hafnium oxynitride gate dielectric", published 2000-01-11, assigned to Texas Instruments Inc.
^Patchett, P. Jonathan (January 1983). "Importance of the Lu-Hf isotopic system in studies of planetary chronology and chemical evolution". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 47 (1): 81–91. Bibcode:1983GeCoA..47...81P. doi:10.1016/0016-7037(83)90092-3.
^Söderlund, Ulf; Patchett, P. Jonathan; Vervoort, Jeffrey D.; Isachsen, Clark E. (March 2004). "The 176Lu decay constant determined by Lu–Hf and U–Pb isotope systematics of Precambrian mafic intrusions". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 219 (3–4): 311–324. Bibcode:2004E&PSL.219..311S. doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00012-3.
^Kinny, P. D. (1 January 2003). "Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd isotope systems in zircon". Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry. 53 (1): 327–341. Bibcode:2003RvMG...53..327K. doi:10.2113/0530327.
^Albarède, F.; Duchêne, S.; Blichert-Toft, J.; Luais, B.; Télouk, P.; Lardeaux, J.-M. (5 June 1997). "The Lu–Hf dating of garnets and the ages of the Alpine high-pressure metamorphism". Nature. 387 (6633): 586–589. Bibcode:1997Natur.387..586D. doi:10.1038/42446. S2CID4260388.
![{\displaystyle {\ce {HfCl4 + 2Mg ->[1100^oC] Hf + 2MgCl2}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/aa72f37e998474c30ff0a68803a831241768a664)
![{\displaystyle {\ce {Hf + 2I2 ->[500^oC] HfI4}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/ac2cfa9d8a39e3fc014956d17bc17a4d7b22bbed)
![{\displaystyle {\ce {HfI4 ->[1700^oC] Hf + 2I2}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/f3f0df30a8edc787cb1735a3dc40ac05af6e924f)
