Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Classification  



1.1  Lieberherr & Bodt (2017)  





1.2  Tresoldi et al. (2022)  







2 Vocabulary  





3 See also  





4 Further reading  





5 References  














Kho-Bwa languages






Asturianu
Čeština
Español
Galego
ि
Occitan
Tiếng Vit

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Kho-Bwa
Kamengic
Bugunish
Geographic
distribution
Arunachal Pradesh
Linguistic classificationSino-Tibetan?
  • Kho-Bwa
Subdivisions
Glottologkhob1235

The Kho-Bwa languages, also known as Kamengic, are a small family of languages spoken in Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India. The name Kho-Bwa was originally proposed by George van Driem (2001). It is based on the reconstructed words *kho ("water") and *bwa ("fire"). Blench (2011) suggests the name Kamengic, from the Kameng area of Arunachal Pradesh. Alternatively, Anderson (2014)[1] refers to Kho-Bwa as Northeast Kamengic.

Both Van Driem and Blench group the Sherdukpen (or Mey), Lishpa (or Khispi), Chug (Duhumbi) and Sartang languages together. These form a language cluster and are clearly related. The Sulung (or Puroik) and Khowa (or Bugun) languages are included in the family by Van Driem (2001) but provisionally treated as language isolates, with no demonstrated genetic relationship to Kamengic, by Blench (2023).[2]

These languages have traditionally been placed in the Tibeto-Burman group by the Linguistic Survey of India, but the justification of this is open to question.[citation needed] The languages have certainly been strongly influenced by the neighboring Sino-Tibetan languages, but this does not necessarily imply genetic unity and may possibly be a purely areal effect.[3]

The entire language family has about 15,000 speakers (including Puroik) or about 10,000 speakers (excluding Puroik), according to estimates made during the 2000s.

Word lists and sociolinguistic surveys of Kho-Bwa languages have also been conducted by Abraham, et al. (2018).

Classification[edit]

The internal structure of the Kho-Bwa group of languages is as follows.[citation needed]

  • Bugun (Khowa)
  • Western Kho-Bwa
    • Mey–Sartang
      • Sherdukpen (Mey, Ngnok), divided into two varieties:
        • Shergaon
        • Rupa
      • Sartang (Bootpa, But Monpa, But Pa, Matchopa), 50%–60% lexical similarity with Mey.
    • Chug–Lish
      • Lish (Lish)
      • Chug (Chug Monpa, Chugpa, Monpa), close to Lish
  • Lieberherr & Bodt (2017)[edit]

    Lieberherr & Bodt (2017)[4] consider Puroik to be a Kho-Bwa language, and classify the Kho-Bwa languages as follows.

  • Bugun
  • Western Kho-Bwa
  • Tresoldi et al. (2022)[edit]

    Based on computational phylogenetic analyses from Tresoldi et al. (2022), the phylogenetic tree of Kho-Bwa is roughly as follows:[5]

    • Kho-Bwa
      • Western
  • MeySartang: Shergaon, Rupa, Jerigaon, Khoina, Rahung, Khoitam
  • Bugun
    • A
      • Bulu, Rawa, Kojo Rojo
      • Sario Saria, Lasumpatte, Chayangtajo
    • B
      • Namphri, Kaspi
      • Wangho, Dikhyang
      • Singchaung, Bichom
  • Vocabulary[edit]

    The following table of Kho-Bwa basic vocabulary items is from Blench (2015).[6]

    Gloss Mey (Shergaon) Mey (Rupa) Sartang (Jergaon) Sartang (Rahung) Lish (Khispi) Chug (Duhumbi)
    one hǎn han hèn hân hin hin
    two ɲǐt ɲik nìk ɲes niʃ
    three ùŋ ùŋ ùún ʔum om
    four pʰʃì bsi psì pʰəhi psi
    five kʰù kʰu kʰù kʰu kʰa kʰa
    six ʧùk kit ʧìk ʨěy ʧʰuʔ ʧyk
    seven ʃìt sit sìk sǐ, sě ʃis his
    eight sàʤát sarʤat sàrgè sàrʤɛ́ saɾgeʔ saɾgeʔ
    nine tʰkʰí dʰikʰi tʰkʰì tɛ̀kʰɯ́ ṱʰikʰu ṱʰikʰu
    ten sɔ̀ ̃ sã̀ ʃan ʃan
    head kʰruk kʰruk kʰrǔk kʰruʔ kʰoloʔ kʰloʔ
    nose nupʰuŋ nəfuŋ nfùŋ apʰuŋ hempoŋ heŋpʰoŋ
    eye khibi kivi kábì kʰaʔby kʰumu kʰum
    ear kʰtùŋ gtʰiŋ gtʰìŋ ktèíŋ kʰutʰuŋ kʰutʰuŋ
    tongue laphõ lapon ? le loi loi
    tooth nuthuŋ tokʧe mísìŋ nitʰiŋ ʃiŋtuŋ hintuŋ
    arm ik ik ìk ik hu hut
    leg lapon lɛ̌ lɛ̌ lei lai
    belly ʃrìŋ sliŋ srìŋ sriŋ hiɲiŋ hiliŋ
    bone skìk skik àhík skik ʃukuʃ ʃukuʃ
    blood ha(a) hɛ̀ ha hoi hoi
    face dòŋpù bo mi zə̀í doʔ doŋpa
    tooth ntùŋ tokʧe mísìŋ ptə̀íŋ ʃiŋtuŋ hintuŋ
    stomach àlà karbu ʧàk phriŋ hiɲiŋ hiliŋ
    mouth ʧàw nəʧaw so ʨʨǒ hoʧok kʰoʧu
    rain ʧuuma nimi nʧʰù ʧuʧuba namu namu

    See also[edit]

    Further reading[edit]

    References[edit]

    1. ^ Anderson, Gregory D.S. 2014. On the classification of the Hruso (Aka) language. Paper presented at the 20th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
  • ^ What is the evidence that the isolate languages of Arunachal Pradesh are genuinely Trans-Himalayan?
  • ^ Blench (2011): "Certainly, the phonology and morphology of Arunachali languages looks superficially like Tibeto-Burman, which explains their placing in the Linguistic Survey of India. Unfortunately, this is rather where matters have remained [... this paper] proposes we should take seriously the underlying presumption probably implied in Konow's statement in Linguistic Survey of India. Volume III, 1, Tibeto-Burman family, Calcutta (1909:572)], that these languages may not be Sino-Tibetan but simply have been influenced by it; that they are language isolates."
  • ^ Lieberherr, Ismael; Bodt, Timotheus Adrianus. 2017. Sub-grouping Kho-Bwa based on shared core vocabulary. In Himalayan Linguistics, 16(2).
  • ^ Tiago Tresoldi; Christoph Rzymski; Robert Forkel; Simon J. Greenhill; Johann-Mattis List; Russell D. Gray (2022). "Managing Historical Linguistic Data for Computational Phylogenetics and Computer-Assisted Language Comparison". The Open Handbook of Linguistic Data Management. The MIT Press. pp. 345–354. doi:10.7551/mitpress/12200.003.0033. ISBN 978-0-262-36607-6.
  • ^ Blench, Roger. 2015. The Mey languages and their classification. Presentation given at the University of Sydney, 21 August 2015.

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kho-Bwa_languages&oldid=1193069581"

    Categories: 
    Kho-Bwa languages
    Languages of India
    Proposed language families
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles with short description
    Short description matches Wikidata
    Use dmy dates from October 2019
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from October 2014
    Articles with unsourced statements from February 2019
     



    This page was last edited on 1 January 2024, at 22:18 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki