Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 The cand mtexts  





2 Important early manuscripts  





3 The mtext in England  





4 The ctext in England  



4.1  Durham group  





4.2  Winchester group  





4.3  Manuscripts of the ctext containing the miracle of St. Oswald  



4.3.1  Gloucester group  





4.3.2  Other manuscripts  







4.4  Yorkshire group  





4.5  Southern text  



4.5.1  Digby group  





4.5.2  Rochester group  







4.6  Uncertain lineage  







5 Manuscripts not clearly of morctype  





6 References  





7 Sources  














List of manuscripts of Bede's Historia Ecclesiastica







Add links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 



This list of manuscripts of Bede's Historia Ecclesiastica gives the location and name of known surviving manuscripts of Bede's most famous work, the Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum (Ecclesiastical History of the English People).

The c and m texts[edit]

The majority of the manuscripts of Bede's Historia Ecclesiastica fall into one of two groups, known to scholars as c and m. The distinction between these two groups was first noticed by Charles Plummer, in his Baedae Opera Historica, published in 1896. Plummer gives five significant differences between the two:[1]

  1. In the m text, Bede asks for the prayers of his readers at the end of his preface; in the c text this comes at the end of the whole work.
  2. Chapter 14 of book IV only appears in the m manuscripts.
  3. There are three words in the m text near the beginning of book IV, chapter 18, which are omitted in the c text.
  4. There is a variation between the texts in the annal for 731 given in the recapitulation at the end of the work; and in addition, the c text adds annals for 733 and 734 which do not appear in the m text.
  5. The list of Bede's works in the c text omits his excerpts from Jerome on the prophets.

Colgrave, in his 1969 edition of the text, adds one more to this list, though he attributes this distinction to Plummer also:[2]

  1. The account of the miracles of St. Cuthbert in chapters 31 and 32 differs in that at the end of book IV, chapter 30, the m text uses "quaedam quae", where the c text has "unum quae"; the Latin in the c text implies only one miracle will be related, instead of the two that follow. In addition, the list of chapter headings in the c text has the headings for chapters 31 and 32 reversed.

The c text is now thought to be an earlier form of the work, since it is unlikely Bede (or any reviser) would have removed IV.14.

In Britain, only the c text circulated, whereas almost all the copies on the continent were of the m form.

Important early manuscripts[edit]

There are three early manuscripts of the c text, and five of the m text, which are regarded as the basis of these versions of Bede's work. The letters at the start of each manuscript description are used by scholars to refer to the main manuscripts; these were mostly assigned by Plummer, with some modifications by Colgrave. The "CLA" number quoted refers to the Codices Latini Antiquiores, a published series of manuscripts that includes several of the Bede manuscripts.[3]

The following are c text manuscripts.

The following are m text manuscripts.

The m text in England[edit]

Only one manuscript of the m type remained in England.[4]

The c text in England[edit]

The numerous c text manuscripts in England can be assigned to groups with greater or lesser certainty according to the correspondences between the manuscripts, though how they are derived from the original is not always clear.

Two manuscripts may have direct lineal relationship with C:[5]

Durham group[edit]

This group, so named by Plummer, consists of a manuscript from Durham cathedral and eight further manuscripts that are derived from it.[7] The parent is:

The derived manuscripts are:

Winchester group[edit]

This group consists of three manuscripts, the earliest of which is from Winchester.[8]

Manuscripts of the c text containing the miracle of St. Oswald[edit]

One of the distinguishing marks of the c text is the omission of IV.14, which tells of a miracle performed by St Oswald. However, by the end of the 11th century the missing chapter had been recovered from an m text manuscript. The following groups of manuscripts are all of c type but contain IV.14.

Gloucester group[edit]

This group shares with B, above, a pair of additions to the text.[9]

Other manuscripts[edit]

Other copies that include the chapter on St Oswald exist, but for the relationships with other manuscripts are more obscure.[10]

Yorkshire group[edit]

This group is identified by the omission of the text from part way through V.24 onwards; the manuscript from which these manuscripts derive was presumably damaged or unfinished.[11]

There are also four copies recorded in medieval catalogues that may have been related to this group. These are:[13]

Southern text[edit]

These manuscripts are described by Colgrave as representing "the common text of southern England in the later Middle Ages".[13] It is characterized by several changes made to the manuscripts; Colgrave gives several examples from chapters in book I of the text. This group falls into two parts, with each set characterized by commonalities in the text.[13]

Digby group[edit]

The first set, named the "Digby group",[14] consists of:[15]

Colgrave suggests that a manuscript known to have been given to Pembroke College, Cambridge by Hugh Damlett in 1476 was probably in this group also.

Rochester group[edit]

The second group is characterised by, among other things, the inclusion of an Old English text on the resting places of English saints (known as the Secgan). It consists of:[16]

Three others in this group may be listed separately; one is now lost, and the other two are less closely related to the manuscripts listed above.

Uncertain lineage[edit]

Several English manuscripts, though clearly c texts, have not been placed in relationship to the other surviving manuscripts. These include:[17]

Manuscripts not clearly of morc type[edit]

Other manuscripts exist that cannot be traced to the morc texts.[20][21][22]

A record survives in a catalogue of Glastonbury manuscripts from 1247 of a copy titled Historiae Anglorum scriptae a Beda, but it is not known what became of it.

References[edit]

  1. ^ Plummer, Baedae Opera Historica, pp. xciv–xcv.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastical History, pp. xl–xli.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastical History, pp. xliv–xlv.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastica Historia, pp. xlvi–xlvii.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastica Historia, pp. xlvii–xlviii.
  • ^ "254". St. John's College, University of Cambridge. Retrieved 12 April 2009.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastica Historia, pp. xlix–l.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastical History, pp. l–li.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastical History, pp. li–lii.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastical History, p. liii.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastical History, pp. liii–lv.
  • ^ Thomson, Catalogue, p. viii.
  • ^ a b c Colgrave, Bede's Historia Ecclesiastica, p. lv.
  • ^ So named by E. van K. Dobbie; see Dobbie, The manuscripts of Cædmon's hymn, p. 76.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastical History, pp. lv–lvii.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastical History, pp. lvii–lix.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastica Historia, p. xlviii.
  • ^ Plummer, Bedae Opera Historica II, p. 118. Colgrave mentions this also (Bede's Ecclesiastical History, p. lv) but does not give the modern name of the manuscript: the Phillipps collection has been dispersed since Plummer's day.
  • ^ Atherton, Norwich Cathedral, p. 334.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastical History, pp. xlv–xlvi.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastical History, p. xlvii.
  • ^ Colgrave, Bede's Ecclesiastical History, pp. lix–lxi.
  • Sources[edit]


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_manuscripts_of_Bede%27s_Historia_Ecclesiastica&oldid=1223503401"

    Categories: 
    British literature-related lists
    Harleian Collection
    Bede manuscripts
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    CS1 maint: location missing publisher
    Articles containing Latin-language text
     



    This page was last edited on 12 May 2024, at 15:45 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki