The Medtronic Minimed Paradigm 515 pump (RF receiver), Silhouette infusion set, and UltraLink blood sugar meter (RF transmitter)
MiniMed Paradigm is a series of insulin pumps manufactured by Medtronic for patients with diabetes mellitus. The pump operates with a single AAA battery and uses a piston-plunger pumptoinfuse a programmed amount of insulin into the patient through a length of tubing. The Paradigm uses a one-way wireless radio frequency link to receive blood sugar measurements from select glucose meters. The Paradigm RT (Real Time) series adds the ability to receive data from a mated continuous blood-glucose monitor. Although the pump can use these measurements to assist in calculating a dose of insulin, no actual change in insulin delivery occurs without manual user-intervention.
[1][2]
Pump and infusion set (catheter) placementInsulin basal bolus profile
Insulin pumps are drug delivery devices used to treat patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The Minimed Paradigm REAL-Time and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) system, which received FDA clearance in 2006, uses tubing and a reservoir with rapid-acting insulin. This "infusion set" is patient-connected via a catheter to the abdomen region. The infusion set can remain in the place for three days while the pump is clip-belt worn. There is a quick-disconnect feature for the tubing. The pump delivers insulin in two modes. In basal rate mode, the delivery is continuous in small doses similar to a pancreas, for example 0.15 units per hour throughout the day. Basal rates are set to meet individual metabolic rates. In bolus mode, the delivery is programmed to be a one-time delivery prior to eating or after an unexpected high, for example 18 units spread out to several hours. This type of continuous treatment is in contrast to traditional multiple daily injections (MDI) that use slower-acting insulin. Continuous treatment reduces glucose variability.[4]
The Paradigm system consists of two basic parts: an insulin pump and an optional glucose sensor CGM worn for up to three days. The disposable sensor is subcutaneously-placed to make glucose measurements[5]ininterstitial fluid every five minutes and transmit the reading via low power radio frequency (ISM band) to the pump for realtime display. However, insulin therapy may be conducted without CGM and although there is not yet an automated insulin-regulation feedback mechanism between measure and infusion to control the amount and timing of insulin, this is clearly a future objective. Any change in basal or bolus is patient-driven by programming the pump using the Bolus Wizard. The latest model pumps are the MiniMed Paradigm 522 and 722, which differ in reservoir size, 176 versus 300 units, respectively. In 2007 the FDA approved a pediatric model for patients 7 to 17 years old.[6]
Currently, Medtronic has the following research and development projects in its pipeline: Next Generation REAL-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System; Next Generation Insulin Pump; Pre-filled Insulin Reservoirs; Implantable Insulin Pump; and Artificial pancreas (Semi-Automated System & Closed-Loop System).[9] The industry trend in portable devices has piggybacked on the success of wireless technology[17] but not on the success of other disciplines, such as dynamical system, Cybernetics and adaptive systems, for root cause solutions
This article appears to contain a large number of buzzwords. There might be a discussion about this on the talk page. Please help improve this article if you can.(August 2022)
to close the "true" loop.[18] While the slow-responding dynamics in the physiology of glucose regulation is not beyond the mathematics of PID controllers, 50 years of patient-perspective "advancement" says it is beyond the corporate, congressional, and lobbying leaders. Also, the accuracy of existing continuous glucose monitoring systems poses a problem for an artificial pancreas.
ADA - Implications of the DCCT study Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 25–27.
ADA - Implications of the UKPD Study Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 28–32.
Bell D.S.H., Fernando O. (2000). "Improved glycemic control with use of CSII compared with MDI therapy". Endocrine Practice. 6 (5): 257–360. doi:10.4158/EP.6.5.357. PMID11141585.
Bode B.W., Steed R.D., Davidson P.C. (1996). "Reduction in severe hypoglycemia with longterm CSII in type 1 diabetes". Diabetes Care. 19 (4): 324–7. doi:10.2337/diacare.19.4.324. PMID8729154. S2CID29779558.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Bode BW; et al. (1999). "Continuous glucose monitoring used to adjust diabetes therapy improves glycosylated hemoglobin: A pilot study". Diabetes Research and Clin Practice. 46 (3): 183–90. doi:10.1016/S0168-8227(99)00113-8. PMID10624783. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2004;6(2):105-13.
Boland E.A., Grey M.; et al. (1999). "CSII - a new way to lower risk of severe hypoglycemia, improve metabolic control, and enhance coping in adolescents with type 1 diabetes". Diabetes Care. 22 (11): 1779–84. doi:10.2337/diacare.22.11.1779. PMID10546007.
Carlton F.B. (2000). "Recent advances in the pharmacologic management of diabetes mellitus". Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America. 18 (4): 745–53. doi:10.1016/S0733-8627(05)70156-5. PMID11130936.
Chantelau E., Schiffers T., Schutze J., Hansen B. (1997). "Effect of patient-selected intensive insulin therapy on quality of life". Patient Education and Counseling. 38 (2): 167–713. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(96)00964-0. PMID9128618.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Crawford L.M., Sinha R.N., Odell R.M., Comi R.J. (2000). "Efficacy of insulin pump therapy: mealtime delivery is the key factor". Endocrine Practice. 6 (3): 239–43. doi:10.4158/EP.6.3.239. PMID11421538.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
The DCCT Research Group. JAMA. 1997;227(5):374-4 Skyler J.S. Diabtes Technol Ther. 2000.
The DCCT Research Group. Progression of retinopathy with intensive versus conventional treatment in the diabetes control and complications trial. 1994.
The DCCT/EDIC Study Research Group. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. NEJM 2005; 353(25): 2643–2653.
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1.
Floyd J.C., Cornell R.G.; et al. (1993). "A prospective study identifying risk factors for discontinuance of insulin pump therapy". Diabetes Care. 16 (11): 1470–8. doi:10.2337/diacare.16.11.1470. PMID8299436. S2CID23783836.
Haakens K., Hanssen K.F.; et al. (1990). "CSII, MDI and conventional insulin therapy in self-selecting insulin-dependent diabetic patients. A comparison of metabolic control acute complications and patient preferences". J Intern Med. 228 (5): 457–464. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.1990.tb00263.x. PMID2254715. S2CID20197231.
Ludvigsson J; et al. (2003). "Continuous Subcutaneous Glucose Monitoring Improved Metabolic Control in Pediatric Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Controlled Crossover Study". Pediatrics. 111 (5): 933–8. doi:10.1542/peds.111.5.933. PMID12728068. S2CID30709714.
Marcus A.O., Fernandez M.P. (1996). "Insulin pump therapy; acceptable alternative to injecting therapy". Postgraduate Medicine. 99: 3.
Pitzer KR; et al. (2001). "Detection of Hypoglycemia With the GlucoWatch Biographer". Diabetes Care. 24 (5): 881–885. doi:10.2337/diacare.24.5.881. PMID11347748.
Tsui E.Y.L, Chiasson J.L; et al. (1998). "Counterregulatory hormone responses after long-term CSII with lispro insulin". Diabetes Care. 21 (1): 93–6. doi:10.2337/diacare.21.1.93. PMID9538976. S2CID21217439.
