This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article seems a bit sloppy and bias
Can't tell where it came from, but I agree with it.
Blondesareeasy (talk) 06:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article is outdated, now; the lede was revised after November 30, 2014 case outcome, but the rest is written as if the case was outstanding. Also there is Biography of Living Persons issues with this, I believe. The article is linked by hatnotes from Grace Huang and Matthew Huang articles about different unrelated persons; this article is the article about Matthew and Grace Huang, so it should be treated as a BLP. Tagged the article with {{update}} and added WikiProject Biography with status living=yes here. Hope this brings some attention here. --doncram 21:40, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For the most part, this article is written in an argumentative tone rather than an encyclopedic one. It is rife with weasel words, loaded language, puffery, POV statements, original research, unreferenced statements and unreliable sources. I will tag accordingly. My problems, specifically, in a few short examples:
Other outstanding issues: the detainment section seems to be outdated ("If convicted, they could face the death sentence, although Qatar has maintained a moratorium on actual executions for more than a decade"). There may be some irrelevant details, i.e. Matthew Huang's educational qualifications. I am also not sure if the 'Petition to Qatar' section is notable. It is currently unreferenced and actually has an external link to the petition itself.
It would take a massive amount of time and effort to make this article encyclopedic. I may try to find time in the next week to remedy some of the more obvious issues, provided there are no objections or misinterpretations on my part. Elspamo4 (talk) 23:20, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Cyberbot II has detected links on 2013 Huang Case in Qatar which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: localorglobal If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locallyorglobally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\bchange\.org\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Cyberbot II has detected links on 2013 Huang Case in Qatar which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: localorglobal If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locallyorglobally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\bchange\.org\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:55, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]