This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose – Reliable sources give the call sign for that flight as 'KONDOR 26', but that's not necessarily the same as the flight number. The only source giving the flight number as 26 is the ASN, which is known sometimes for making up flight numbers from call signs or tail numbers. The current title is fine. --Deeday-UK (talk) 09:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The WikiProject page cited as standard procedure has no standing as a naming convention, so there is no valid rationale for this proposed move. Andrewa (talk) 15:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrewa:@Deeday-UK: Andrewa, here is some proof that the naming convention is also valid [2]. It clearly states that in the lead "refer also". Also, the final report does state it as 'vol KONDOR 26' which means KONDOR flight 26. Username006 (talk) 05:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
