Contents

Talk:AeroVironment RQ-14 Dragon Eye

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Aviation: Aircraft This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project.

This makes no sense:

"# Cruising speed: 65 km/h (40 mph)

1. Battery Endurance: 1 hour
2. Range: 5 km (3.1 mi)
3. Transmission Range: 10 km (6.2 mi)"

What meaning has "range" in this context? It should either be about 65 km (cruising speed x endurance) or 10 km (transmission range). "5 km" seems to make no sense at all. Lastdingo (talk) 19:07, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That data is attributed to GlobalSecurity.org, which includes quite a bit of speculation in their reports of current systems, IMO. The manufacturer of Dragon Eye only claims a speed of 35 km/h, endurance of 45-60 minutes, and a transmission range of "up to" 5 km with a clear line-of-sight. 208.29.186.172 (talk) 21:22, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The successor seems to be Raven http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RQ-11_Raven this should be mentioned. Lastdingo (talk) 19:07, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AeroVironment RQ-14 Dragon Eye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041017053912/http://www.jfcom.mil/about/experiments/mc02/concepts/drageye.htmtohttp://www.jfcom.mil/about/experiments/mc02/concepts/drageye.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:01, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]