Contents

Talk:AfPak

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Afghanistan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pakistan Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dictionary definition

[edit]

This article is about a word. One sentence is defining that word, the rest is about its origin, use, and reception. If you think it's not notable you could put it up for AfD, but the article isn't a dictionary definition and its content couldn't really be different. I guess if someone was ambitious they could write about the whole policy turn toward treating Afghanistan and Pakistan as a unified problem, but that's probably best covered somewhere else.Prezbo (talk) 20:46, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not so much a word as a policy concept. This policy concept has a major relevance to present-day global affairs, just like the 'War on Terror' concept, which understandably has its own category as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.53.250.36 (talk) 13:32, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please add in Bruce Riedel rebuttal of AfPak term, from CIPS Podcasts, from 2009. In his speech The Wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan:Obama's strategy, to Centre for International Policy Studies (CIPS) podcasts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.26.197 (talk) 21:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]