Contents

Talk:Air Evac Lifeteam

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 November 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Emergency Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Emergency medicine and EMS task force (assessed as Low-importance). Disaster management Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Aviation This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

How is Air Evac Lifeteam not notable? it is one of the singlemost largest providers of Air Ambulance services in the US.--209.213.220.227 (talk) 15:08, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'm sure there will be a plethora of news sources that can examplify it's notability. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:10, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Received plenty of news coverage, is a multi-state organization and also has it's fair share of mentions in Google books. -Marcusmax(speak) 15:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above-described coverage meeting WP:GNG. Andrea105 (talk) 16:26, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - operates over 100 aircraft in 14 states, provides most rural EMS in those ares.Very Notable--Degen Earthfast (talk) 17:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hell In A Bucket, maybe you should ask yourself how an air ambulance service which operates over 100 helicopters covering 14 states can be considered non-notable, especially as much smaller local services are included on Wikipedia. It should be kept for the same reasons that Air Methods is. IE being the largest and operating the most aircraft.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 18:03, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BTW Google has 20,100 hits for Air Evac Lifeteam. See [1]

But try [2] and [3] and [4] and [5] just to start.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 18:08, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been tagged since 2016 as having significant promotional language and relying too heavily on primary or close to primary sources. I've managed to eliminate the majority of the promotional language and have eliminated a number of primary or otherwise inappropriate sources, replacing where possible with independent secondary references. At this point I believe I've eliminated/rewritten enough of the promotional language to remove that tag. The article still needs work, however, on either removing information that does not have an available appropriate source or replacing inappropriate sources with solid ones. Having said that, I'm certainly of the opinion this company is notable given the number of solid independent sources I was able to find with minimal research. But, further work is needed. -- DatraxMada (talk) 19:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]