This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
I apologise for undoing and re-adding my contribution. Originally, I had forgotten to sign in before adding the text. I clearly want to always contribute under my own alias.
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot13:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"In spite of this, the work doesn't lack of vivid fast-pacing narration......"
The meaning is unclear. Does the writer mean "the work lacks vivid...." or "the work doesn't lack vivid...."? Who knows, flip a coin. Using "doesn't" is rather too informal for an encyclopaedia.
"They also suggest of a very broad education..." That's not grammatical either - perhaps the writers means "They also suggest a very broad education..." which is better but still not very good. 80.3.41.182 (talk) 23:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like acceptable grammar in some other language, translated too literally into English. Or very archaic English. It's easy to understand though; just remove the "of"s. Adam Bishop (talk) 01:41, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are so right. I removed the archaisms. Also converted "doesn't" to "does not". More polishing is needed, a native speaker would be essential for that task. Dipa1965 (talk) 21:10, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What is 'self-confidence' in writing supposed to mean?
"Her interest in military tactics and positive sciences and the level of self-confidence in her writing abilities are amazing for a woman of that period (or even later)." How is 'self-confidence' in writing measured...? and what is the veiled meaning of "(or even later)" in this statement? Did this contributor mean to imply that women writers lack self-confidence? Seems like an incredibly weighted statement for an encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.105.236.66 (talk) 17:27, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think I have seen it in an non-English source but, since I can't remember where, the claim is dubious and I will remove it.--Dipa1965 (talk) 13:16, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It was stated in a review of Anna Komnene and Her Times by James Howard-Johnston published in Sept. 2002, but without citation and so I was skeptical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.53.222.46 (talk) 04:48, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article suggests that Michael Psellos was Anna Comnene's mentor. I doubt that would have been possible since he had likely died before she was born, or perhaps a little later. His work may have influenced her writing, but he could not have been her mentor. AlexiosGirl (talk) 14:35, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
is this article a result of one of feminist raids on wiki?
they encourage raids like this/
i just dunno, parts of it need complete rewriting... i deleted one of the most ridiculous claims that historians who note her lamentation of not being an empress succeeding her father are 'misogynist'. the unbiasedness of this article is questionable as it is 94.154.66.240 (talk) 22:37, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Those dastardly feminists! Did you read the work that was referenced there? I haven't either, but I would imagine that it is criticizing modern historians (old stuffy men, no doubt) for presenting Anna as some sort of shrew scheming for a throne she didn't deserve. But let's see if we can find the reference first... Adam Bishop (talk) 17:35, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Aha, indeed, the referenced article says『generations of scholars have recreated this story, using familiar topoi about women’s psychology to craft a picture of Anna as woman with a vexed relationship to imperial power.』Examples are provided going all the way back to Nicetas Choniates. It's a pretty interesting article, it's on JSTOR, if you have access to that. No insidious feminist plot, though I expect if you are predisposed to see those everywhere, this will not convince you otherwise. Adam Bishop (talk) 20:32, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the anonymous editor. Where is the misogyny we are discussing here? Removed reference was a marginal over-feminist view.--Dipa1965 (talk) 19:34, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nah, I think the last thing we need here is contemporary pro-feminist or misogynistic partizanship, projected in pre-modern times. Thank you.--Dipa1965 (talk) 18:22, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Great, it's another current century academic who colours history with current century concerns and doesn't see any problem with that. People of future centuries will just discard such work as garbage that says more about the people who wrote it than the purported subject, while in the meantime common folks must figure out how much of what you write should be discarded as worthless ivory tower current century orthodoxy. This is what I do when I read this article, I'm forced to wonder how much of it comes from a gender studies dissertation. The offending section was dumped in there in one block, maybe something should be done about it, it really comes of as dissertation copy-paste, which turns out it is. Its author introduced it on his sandbox as "Below is my work for my Medieval Women class, Spring 2013, concerning the Alexiad.". Note that the French version of this article is much lengthier yet doesn't suffer from gender studies-speak. --90.156.104.160 (talk) 20:49, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Can we remove the Maintenance Template yet? Or at least scale it back? Does this article still lack citation or NPOV? The notice has been there for almost 5 years, and the article looks quite different from back then. The tone and research are quite, quite different from back then, so I suggest deleting it. Any consensus? --Akhenaten0 (talk) 21:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Knobri3 (article contribs).
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Knobri3 (article contribs).
