Contents

Talk:Battle of Anzen

	Battle of Anzen has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit.
Article milestones Date Process Result April 3, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 6, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in the Battle of Anzen, the Byzantine emperor Theophilos managed to avoid death or capture due to a sudden rainfall that loosened his enemies' bowstrings?
	Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 22, 2010, July 22, 2014, July 22, 2016, July 22, 2018, July 22, 2019, July 22, 2022, and July 22, 2024.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Roman & Byzantine / Medieval / Early Muslim This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Roman and Byzantine military history task force Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500) Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600) Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Greece: Byzantine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Anzen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 15:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be undertaking the review of this article against the Good Article criteria, per its nomination for Good Article status. ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 15:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.

   • 

2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.

   • 

3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.

   • 

4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.

   • 

5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

   • 

Article passes quick fail criteria. Main review to follow. ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 15:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a(prose):

   • Well written.

   b(MoS):

   • Conforms to manual of style. Some unnecessary wikilinks but occurences removed per WP:OVERLINK.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a(references):

   • Well referenced.

   b(citations to reliable sources):

   • Citations are to third party publications.

   c(OR):

   • No evidence of OR.

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a(major aspects):

   • Addresses major aspect of article subject matter. Although short, highly informative.

   b(focused):

   • Remains focused. No digressions. Keeps to description of battle.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:

   • No issues concerning POV evident.

5. It is stable:

   • No edit wars etc.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a(images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   • Images are properly tagged and justified.

   b(appropriate use with suitable captions):

   • Images are accompanied by contextual captions.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: PASS ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 15:35, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Anzen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120220082440/http://asiaminor.ehw.gr/forms/fLemmaBodyExtended.aspx?lemmaid=7921&boithimata_State=&kefalaia_State=tohttp://asiaminor.ehw.gr/forms/fLemmaBodyExtended.aspx?lemmaid=7921&boithimata_State=&kefalaia_State=#chapter_1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721080845/http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=7921tohttp://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=7921

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]