This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
This article is horribly pro-turkish and need to be re-written. In the first stage of the battle the full 100.000 turkish army was visible in front of micai and his army. Then Sinan split his army into 3 parts and tried to encircle Micai and left in front of him around 40.000. One part of his forces was stopped by Albert Kiraly. In any case the turks failed miserably to encircle the Romanians in time, since they were defeated in main battle.
I have some problems with this article: 1. The Hungarian Kingdom did not existed. 2. Albert Kiraly was a mercenary Captain. 3, I provided sources but they keep being deleted. AlexanderXVI (talk) 14:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Hungarian Kingdom was exist, because the Austrian Grand Prince was king of Hungary and Croatia. The foreign states admit the autonomus Hungarian Kingdom in the Habsburg Monarchy, in the same way also Bohemia. The Holy Legua asked for help the Cossack, and Cossack Army attack to the Tatar and Ottoman territorys. The Serbs and Bulgarians also rebel to in 1594, and seize an relevant Ottoman Fort in Bulgaria and numbers join in the Austrian, Hungarian and Wallachian army. Nor yet few thousand Cossack cavalry was come up Hungary, Transylvania and Wallachia battle to againts the Ottomans. Doncseczznánje17:29, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you even see what you write? The Hungarian Kingdom withing a monarchy? How can this be possible? You tell me that the Hungarian Kingdom existed withing the Habsburg monarchy?
Secondly, the inexistent Hungarian Kingdom never sent any troops to help Michael the Brave. In fact, the only foreign troops that participated at that Battle were the Szeklers. Cossacks, Bulgarians or Serbians are not mentioned by the participants at the battle! It is a serious mistake to put such informations on any website.AlexanderXVI (talk) 17:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am gonna change the number of Ottomans to unknown if not a good english source appears. In addition is this article only showing everything from "Wallachian" point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsaces (talk • contribs) 08:06, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Călugăreni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Doncseczznánje 17:29, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
