Contents

Talk:Battle of Ilipa

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spain Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: European / Roman & Byzantine / Spanish / Classical This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  European military history task force Roman and Byzantine military history task force Spanish military history task force Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD) Africa: Tunisia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tunisia (assessed as Low-importance). Phoenicia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

[edit]

• Ensured that this article is: within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class.

• This article would benefit from: in-text citations. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I found the opening paragraph to be a huge understatement of Scipio's tactical achievement in this battle. His tactics were in fact highly innovative (unlike his victory at Zama, which was more along the lines of giving Hannibal a dose of his own medicine due to securing a stronger cavalry) and at least as deserving of praise as Hannibal's performance at Cannae. I'll get around to digging up some secondaries and even some of my own diagrams (based on the accounts of Polybius and some secondary sources). I can't believe this article is little better than a stub. FiReSTaRT (talk) 02:02, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ilipa1.svg directly contradicts the text, about the position of Romans and their allies.91.10.37.164 (talk) 17:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]