 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
The Bedford-Stuyvesant Volunteer Ambulance Corps is definitely not the first minority-run volunteer ambulance corps. It is quite possible there were others, but Hatzolah was founded in Williamsburg in the 1960s by the Jews to serve the Jewish communities of Williamsburg. Even before 1988, additional Hatzolah corps in Flatbush and Boro Park and outside of Brooklyn had been started by Jewish communities. The Bed-Sty Volunteer Ambulance Corps therefore is definitely not the first minority ambulance corps. Unclemoishy770 02:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Zach Sandman[reply]
This is to advise we never claimed to be the first minority run ambulance corp, The Bedford-Stuyvesant Volunteer Ambulance Corps was giving the distinction of being the world's first minority-run ambulance corps by former President George Bush. We also do not claim to be Jewish, although we have Jews, Gentiles Christians,Catholics, Muslims and all religious demoniations in our ambulance corp. We are inclusive, not exclusive, we donot limit our membership to one group of individuals. So while you are offended by our distinction given to us by the highest auth at the time, we will also open our doors to you. If not find another cause to be outraged about because Bed Sty is too busy saving lives than to dabber in discussion about the distinction the world has bestowed amongst us.
James Rocky Robinson CEO/Founder/President of the Worlds Multicultural Volunteer Ambulance Corps
PS: Our VP is a Jewish woman —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.127.128.108 (talk) 13:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
According to an article I read, there was a now-defunct volunteer ambulance service that pre-dated this one. It was run by the Plenty Organization and served the South Bronx.
That being said, Ambulance services should never be about ethnicity. An organization should service anyone within a designated service area. And it is not about who was first but who still exists now. The Bed Stuy Vollies are still operational in an era where many NYC Vollies have shut down. We exist in a climate where there is little if any support from any level government agency. We exist because the communities we serve want us to.
A NYC Volly Ambulance Service exists for the patient, not for the orgnaization itself. I can not imagine anyone in need of emergency medical care concerning him or herself with how long the responding agency has existed.
The Bedford-Stuyvesant Volunteer Ambulance Corps is an outstanding service with very talented people. I believe they and all the NYC Vollies that still exist will continue to thrive and serve as models for other groups so that every neighborhood in the city one day will rely on itself for EMS coverage.
Community before government.
BRAVO Volunteer Ambulance Service #10074 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.84.58.8 (talk) 01:41, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bedford-Stuyvesant Volunteer Ambulance Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
