Contents

Talk:Bing Crosby

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bing Crosby article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

	Bing Crosby is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones Date Process Result December 29, 2015 Featured article candidate Not promoted March 16, 2022 Peer review Reviewed
Current status: Former featured article candidate

This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians / Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Top-importance). This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance). California Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofCalifornia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Baseball Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. College football Bottom‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles Bottom This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale. Golf Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pop music High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Radio High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary) Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane Maintain : Portal:Radio Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs Verify : Unreferenced BLPs Other : Collaboration of the Week: Requests for Radio peer review: Rod Serling The Howard Stern Show The History of Rock & Roll American Top 40; The Museum of Curiosity; Scott Mills (radio show) Spain Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance). Television High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://www.nytimes.com/1971/01/24/archives/salmons-friends-gather-at-waldorf.html https://www.nytimes.com/1975/08/17/archives/the-politics-of-salmon.html David R. Montgomery, King of Fish: The Thousand-Year Run of Salmon, (Cambridge, Westview, 2003), 114. Comment: "Bing Crosby advocated for salmon conservation in the North Atlantic against Denmark's overfishing in the early 1970s. The Danish government banned everything Bing Crosby in Denmark, but because he was so popular there, the Danish people protested the government, making them overturn the Bing Crosby law and even to enact salmon conservation legislation."

For someone better at orthography than I, should there be hyphens in the phrases "post World War II" and "broadcast quality", both in paragraph 5 of the lead? -- Pete Best Beatles (talk) 06:29, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pete Best Beatles I am going by instinct here. The WWII may be fine, (you could check other WWII era articles to see how other editors handled this) but I would prefer a hyphen for broadcast-quality. I see a problem with "prerecorded" my mind prefers "pre-recorded", but predictive text showed "prerecorded"....so what do I know!? Check this section MOS:HYPHEN which may provide better assistance. Overall, I suggest you have a read through WP:MOS for persnickety issues. Tribe of Tiger ^{Let's Purrfect!} 20:30, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2601:447:4000:220:25FE:BEDC:E29D:96A3 If you want to make changes to the section on FBI files and mafia involvement I think it would be best to propose the changes here on the talk page first. Your edits have been unsourced, or attributed to a source that does not verify the claims at all. Of course, anybody with intent to change the relevant information is welcome to post in this thread. GabberFlasted (talk) 17:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2601:447:4000:220:25FE:BEDC:E29D:96A3 So there was this thing about ABPnews. The New York Post says that ABPnews published the FBI files - it doesn't tell whether it was ABPnews that claimed that the files contained information on Crosby having had mafia connections. Both Macfarlane and Giddins have traced the source of the claims about the mafia connections back to the New York Post as the first newspaper that jumped on this - this is why Giddins's book is now listed as a source right after the statement that says that it was the New York Post that came up with it. Regardless of what newspaper was the first to make the claim - that the claim is a product of pure phantasy is fact and proven to be such by the FBI files which are listed among the sources at the end of the paragraph. As long as the paragraph makes these points clear (and they are supported by all the listed sources), I'm fine with it. Are you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:EB:4F1C:7D00:E4EC:FEC6:34C6:AA40 (talk) 17:54, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

” the over 280 pages of Crosby's FBI files, there is only one reference to organized crime or gambling dens, the content of a some of the many threats that Bing Crosby received throughout his life.” This sentence makes no sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.68.138 (talk) 08:33, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Bing Crosby Paramount Pictures.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The passage, "the content of a some of the many threats that Crosby received" seems to be confused. 2A00:23CC:B59B:6B01:18C8:EF77:188B:C0FB (talk) 12:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to address an ongoing issue with a user who has been using multiple IPs to edit the Bing Crosby Wikipedia page. This individual was previously banned from the Spanish Wikipedia for inflating Bing Crosby's sales figures and turning the article into a fan page.

He was also banned here while using the name @El Daniel Santiago: but continues to edit using different accounts, as seen in the edit history. link Communicating with him is impossible, and he persistently reverts changes, disregarding proper references and editing standards. He has a specific opinion about Bing Crosby's sales figures, which has already been reverted to one of my edits. In my version, I include both his perspective and mine, incorporating a wide range of sources. Given that the issue of record sales is controversial and there are various conflicting sources, this approach ensures a balanced representation of the information. It is difficult to communicate with him because, in addition to constantly changing IPs and usernames, he refuses to be flexible and accept that there are multiple perspectives on the issue. He only acknowledges his own viewpoint. Markus WikiEditor (talk) 00:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]