This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Bodily integrity' is part of WikiProject Transhumanism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide Transhumanism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.TranshumanismWikipedia:WikiProject TranshumanismTemplate:WikiProject TranshumanismTranshumanism articles
Add Transhumanism navigation template on the bottom of all transhumanism articles; (use {{Transhumanism}} or see navigation template)
Add Transhumanism info box to all transhumanism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see info box)
Add [[Category:transhumanism]] to the bottom of all transhumanism related articles, so it shows up on the list of transhumanism articles
Maintenance / Etc
Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see citing sources.
Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be neologisms, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process)
Watch the list of transhumanism related articles and add to accordingly (see transhumanism articles)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
This article is about a concept which is part of a branch of philosophy/economics (capabilities approach) described as "alternative". The typical reader is unlikely to be familiar with the capabilities approach itself, so the very first sentence in the introduction should be something like "Bodily integrity is a concept in the capabilities approach philosophical/economic framework." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.113.122.131 (talk) 15:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this page should also include a section for opposition to this concept, as many people (such as pro-life activists) oppose this concept in an absolute sense. Many of them do support this concept in many cases, though--just not in all cases. Futurist110 (talk) 03:54, 21 July 2012 (UTCI)
No, pro-life people such as me believe in the bodily integrity of the child. So it should rather mention that the pro-choice stance disregard the bodily integrity of the unborn child. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.164.174.47 (talk) 22:42, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
While that may be true, it's not necessary to include this on the page. Pro-life activists don't oppose bodily integrity; they oppose its use in abortion rights debates. If we wanted to include every instance of opposition then I would have put a pro-torture section on as well. The pro-life Wikipedia articles can link to this page, but this entry was meant to define it - not explore the instances of every contentious argument. - Keb838
Bodily integrity and bodily autonomy are distinct concepts. Both terms are used in the article, but they're treated as equivalents. (The latter encompasses the former.)
OckRaztalk09:12, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Bodily integrity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
In the human rights section, there is a claim that the universal declaration of human rights protects bodily integrity. However, I have read through the entire document and I can't find a word about it, and there's also no mention on the human rights page. Can anyone confirm/deny this claim, and if it's true, add a reference? JochemvanHees (talk) 16:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
“Though bodily integrity is (according to the capabilities approach) afforded to every human being, women are more often affected in violations of gender-based violence.” is factually wrong.
“Approximately 37% to 39% of males worldwide are circumcised” per Wikipedia circumcision page which greatly outnumbers the female victim sexual assault rate even when including the brutal but small percentage of women and girls worldwide maimed by FGM. Wikipedia FGM page has 200 million worldwide FGM women and girls out of a 7.8 worldwide population per Wikipedia world population page with 49.9 percent female. 200 million out of 3.9 billion is less than 5 percent and rates of FGM are drastically falling per Wikipedia FGM page.
Infants cannot consent to slicing off the end of the penis foreskin and enduring the weeks of painful urination that follows.
Likewise, gender based violence stats exclude the most common sexual assault on males. Sexual assault is legally defined as unwanted contact between someone genitals and another person - NY state legal statutes. That includes a boy or man being kicked , punched or hit in the genitals uninvited. 90% of males experience it to he point it is degrading comedy to the viewers.
Women and girls are not the most affected by violated body autonomy. Women and girls are definitely not most affected by sexual violence.
Statements as “women and girls most affected” are factually false that they wrongly equate the seriousness of the effect with being most affected falsely leading the reader that men and boys are less affected on a percentage basis.
For references see the Wikipedia pages which have reliable NGO sources for the statistics.
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
