This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bonn–Oberkassel dog article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is a current featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to meet the criteria. Please feel free to leave comments. After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{Article history}} template when the FAC closes. |
![]() | Bonn–Oberkassel dog (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 11 July 2024 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | Bonn–Oberkassel dog has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | Afact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 13, 2024.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that ancient humans cared for a 14,000-year-old puppy?
|
The result was: promotedbyPrimalMustelid talk 01:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
)
Moved to mainspace by Generalissima (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 40 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 23:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
|
Reviewing |
|
Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 20:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewer: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 17:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since you reviewed my FAC for Hotline Miami 2. It'll take me a little bit to get to this one, but I'm going ahead and marking it. λ NegativeMP1 17:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This statement is puzzling:
The puzzle is that (according to WP) the middle Magdalenian is 14,000-15,000 BP and the early Late Glacial Interstadial is 14,000-14,600 BP. They are in the same time range. So, what does this statement mean? Zaslav (talk) 05:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]