This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetictree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo articles
As CITES is an international agreeemnt, it would be intersting to see a CITES artical on many different language wikis and fully incorporated in each wiki. Snowman 08:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
The official CITES website at www.cites.org is in three language versions, English French and Spanish. So perhaps this can help. Barzdo 09:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If the page name change to CITES has a consensus approval, then there is some work to be done on the double redirects to this page. Is there a bot to do this? Snowman 09:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
At first, I thought this page had a copyright violation in it, because it shares some of the wording with http://www.itto.or.jp/live/Live_Server/1637/E-C41-18.doc but apparently, that document copied this! It is dated October 11, and it shares some sections about the background of CITES with sections of this page that are dated earlier. LittleDantalk 20:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on CITES. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
As of writing the Wikipedia page says that the CITES list protects enangered plants and animals. However, does the treaty really and explicitly exclude other regna, such as Fungi? –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 05:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]
The initial clause of the initial sentence of the Preamble in the text of the Convention reads: "Recognizing that wild fauna and flora in their many beautiful and varied forms are an irreplaceable part of the natural systems of the earth which must be protected for this and the generations to come;" (see https://cites.org/eng/disc/text.php#texttop). Appendices I, II and III to the Convention are lists of species afforded different levels or types of protection from over-exploitation (see https://cites.org/eng/app/index.php). See also Kingdom (biology)#Summary, the lead paragraph of the Flora article, and the lead paragraph of the Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines project page. Wtmitchell(talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on CITES. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
In some instances, wildlife parks may decide to remove the horn of animals as a preventive measure against poaching. Animal horns can be safely sawn off without hurting the animal (it is similar to clipping toe nails).
Can horns, obtained in this way be legally sold under CITES by wildlife parks to help fund their own operation ? Mention in article.
--Genetics4good (talk) 10:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The American alligator use to thrive in the REO grand river . Why don’t we repopulate the endangered animals again. We could use alligators from other states to repopulate the region. The American alligator had lived in all the the Rivers tributaries. I say repopulate our endangered animals.[edit]
We must try to help repopulate the American alligator in the REO grand river, because they were all up and down this river during the days of the Indians. We must try to repopulate this endangered animal in there natural habitats. That were all up and down the river and it’s tributary’s. We must make it like it was before. We can use alligator from other states to repopulate the region. 72.200.169.67 (talk) 23:38, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]