Hey, I just wanted to point out a discrepancy in captions in this article and the article for the polar bear (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_bear). In the polar bear's page, it says in the section "Contemporary Regulations" , subsection "Canada and the United States, there is a picture of the CED that states "Dogsleds are used for recreational hunting of polar bears in Canada. Use of motorized vehicles is forbidden." This is where the discrepancy occurs, as on the CED page it says "They are sometimes used for recreational hunting of polar bears in Canada. Use of motorized vehicles, such as snow machines, is more common."
I don't know which one is correct, and the information was not in the sources cited on the wikipedia page. I will look into this more later, I just wanted to know if anyone knew the information directly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musiclover3444 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Parts of this article read like a dog care bog. 24.247.222.255 01:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The 2nd picture shows a group of Huskies, not Canadian Eskimo Dogs. I changed the caption to read "This is a picture of Huskies", since I don't know how to upload a pic of the correct breed. Someone reverted my change. Better to delet the photo than to have it show the wrong breed of dog. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.201.77 (talk) 01:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not a huge thing, but the paragraph temperament talks about loyalty twice. I'm a newer editor, is this ok? Techdude 42 (talk) 03:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This citation link gives an error on the website it links to. I'm guessing this should be fixed. Techdude 42 (talk) 03:34, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to change "color' to the correct spelling of "colour" in the sidebar, but when I do so, the entire colour section disapears. Anyone know how to fix this? this is the bit between "Coat" and "Classifications ...".Kurtdriver (talk) 22:52, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Before my edits, the article's introduction and history sections presented the RCMP dog killings in a misleading and inflammatory manner. I've attempted to improve this by adding a new section called "controversies". The new section covers both sides of the killings debate using neutral language and without drawing any conclusion. This content doesn't belong in the history section while the history itself is controversial. Also, two very different and distinct controversies exist, which further warrants a unique section.
Regarding the decline and "resurgence" of the breed:
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Canadian Eskimo Dog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}} tag to http://www.livingdictionary.com/term/viewTerm.jsp?term=49169844050When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Canadian Eskimo Dog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
