Contents

Talk:Canongate Kirkyard

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Edinburgh Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Edinburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Edinburgh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EdinburghWikipedia:WikiProject EdinburghTemplate:WikiProject EdinburghEdinburgh articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Death Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Cemeteries Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Patrick Hume, 1st Earl of Marchmont[edit]

Do we have any experts on Covenanters and Jacobites? The Patrick Hume, 1st Earl of Marchmont article is clearly a copy n paste from somewhere, and completely contradicted by this article. Could someone please clarify, preferably with ext refs? Please see:

• Talk:Patrick Hume, 1st Earl of Marchmont

--Mais oui! (talk) 07:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This site [1] says he hid there after the Rye House Plot, not the Jacobite rising, which fits. It seems highly unlikley that he was a Catholic and certainly wasnt a Jacobite, the most superficial research would show him to be a solid Presbyterian. The biography article seems to be correct, the bit here looks like nonsense to me. Also, pretty clear that McEwan was not buried here, though there may be a plaque or something.

Massive amounts of unreferenced information were introduced to this and other Edinburgh graveyard pages earlier in the year. It all needs going through with the proverbial comb (which you seem to be making a good start on!). Thanks, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 15:18, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There seems no evidence at all that this is his tomb. Even disregarding the confused historical background here I would hazard that the "Marchmont" here refers to a Marchmont family plot NOT the Earl of Marchmont. It says he lived in Canongate but where does that idea stem from. Should we not just delete this section?--Stephencdickson (talk) 18:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and done. What about McEwan? Do you know whether he has a memorial or should this be removed also? Thanks, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 11:53, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another flat contradiction here:

• He died in 1913 in Mayfair and was buried in the village of Great Bookham in Surrey.

--Mais oui! (talk) 08:08, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest this should be called Canongate Kirkyard. PatGallacher (talk) 19:58, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed for over three weeks. Jenks24 (talk) 13:34, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Canongate Churchyard → Canongate Kirkyard – This its common name, it is inconsistent to use the present name when we have Canongate Kirk. Relisted. Favonian (talk) 16:49, 16 July 2012 (UTC) PatGallacher (talk) 00:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The presence of Ebenezer Scroggie's grave is disputed. There is no evidence that Scoggie existed, nor has there been a grave with his name in the kirkyard. It is possible that he is part of a "Dicken's hoax".^[1][2] Mike Marchmont (talk) 08:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have now incorporated the above information into the article. This is to draw attention to the fact that the presence of this grave is almost certainly a hoax. Mike Marchmont (talk) 08:15, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]