This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2019 and 16 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ldnelson7.
I have just modified 2 external links on Clinical neuroscience. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I just tagged this page because I'm concerned that the page is narrowly focused on the recommendations of a single study to increase interdisciplinary work between some medical specialties and with basic scientists. Perhaps the field of "clinical neuroscience" has a broader basis, in which case the page should reflect that. On the other hand, I'm concerned that the page topic may not really satisfy the criteria for a standalone page. Clinicians who work with the nervous systems are generally neurologists, psychiatrists, neurosurgeons, and psychologists (as well as some more specialized areas like opthalmology and audiology). At most teaching hospitals that I know of, a neuroscience department is a preclinical one. Therefore, I'm concerned that the pagename may just be a trendy name for "doing neuroscience research in humans". That doesn't mean that the phrase does not show up as a search term, but that it does not really represent something that is, in an encyclopedic sense, significantly distinct from other aspects of neuroscience. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:58, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ha! I'm asking more than suggesting. I want to hear what other editors think. The one thing I'm sure of, is that the page as it is right now isn't very good. I can see an argument for keeping the page but expanding it so it isn't simply about one group's recommendation. And I can see an argument that it should just be made a redirect to Neuroscience. And I'm not sure which would be better. I'm hoping to hear from editors who are more familiar with the clinical side of the subject than I am, whether they regard "clinical neuroscience" as a thing, as a real topic within clinical science, or whether (as I have a suspicion) it's just a fancy name for what we cover on other pages. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:03, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the field is very young but clinical neuroscience are mainly interested in developing new ways of diagnosing or treating neuropsychiatric disorders, not only neuroscience research with humans but with clinical populations. The focus is not neuroscience but applied neuroscience. Gcastellanos (talk) 00:41, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2019 and 16 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ldnelson7.
