This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[digital physics#Pancomputationalism or the computational universe theory|pancomputationalism]] The anchor (#Pancomputationalism or the computational universe theory) has been deleted by other users before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors
I propose to remove this section. What do you think?--Powo 15:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's OK but it's really just TYPES OF COMPUTERS/COMPUTING
Graham Cooper BInfTech — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.17.94.76 (talk) 22:53, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have improved (I hope) the physical and mathematical descriptions of computations. Should there be another section? Like computations performed by humans?...--Powo 15:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
ATTENTION PLEASE! Can someone upload the picture at http://www.flickr.com/photos/29237020@N05/5215859771/
it is a new MOLECULAR MODEL OF COMPUTATION.
It has been verified by sci.math. It uses HALF the fetch cycle of a Turing Machine and is directly equivalent to a Turing Machine.
Graham Cooper BInfTech
I'm not convinced with this section. According to the Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics the word calculate means "To work out the value of a mathematical or arithmetical procedure, or the output of an *algorithm". In the same dictionary computation means "A calculation" and definition under compute is simply "= CALCULATE". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoga Conflagration (talk • contribs) 00:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is a computer really a "closed" physical system? Mine requires external power... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdcdnaeifkd (talk • contribs) 23:33, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's obviously not what is meant here. The external power is not an input to the computation. Pinkbeast (talk) 15:58, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There's no 'obviously' in this domain: an ultrafinitist might judge it to be a fundamental failure of the failure to account for power consumption/cooling. But this objection is marginal and would be UNDUE at this level of detail. — Charles Stewart(talk) 11:43, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I tweaked some misformatting on the OR template, which has been updated since it was first placed. It is not clear to me what the OR issues are supposed to be or what has to be done to improve them. Could someone explain who knows the article better? — Charles Stewart(talk) 11:47, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]