This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of KentinSouth East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles
The cricket people have set up a separate stubby article for Coxheath Common. I suggest this is merged into this article, as this article is clearly talking about the ancient heath just as much as the modern village, and the dates of sporting usage illuminate the military usage somewhat. And 8 matches aren't going to overwhelm this article! 86.27.171.145 (talk) 23:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think that it really depends on what the intention is in progressing the Coxheath Common article. Looking at some of the other articles in that cricket venue category, there is definitely potential for a proper standalone article, although how much scope there is for a venue that hosted only 8 first class games I don't know. As it stands, this stub looks much more like an article section than a standalone article and I do think that the Coxheath article would benefit from its inclusion. danno13:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it is. This is a notable early cricket venue, notable enough to be a stand alone article. As per WP:CRIC, provided it has held major cricket matches (first-class, List-A or Twenty20), then it is notable enough to have its own individual article. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 14:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Coxheath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified 6 external links on Coxheath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
