Contents

Talk:Eating recovery

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Medicine Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not sure what to do with this article...

[edit]

There appear to be several Eating recovery centres in the US, but the term "Eating recovery" doesn't reveal any specific hits on google or google scholar. I've not heard the term and query query whether it's a made for WP neologism....? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:00, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe "Recovery from eating disorders" or "Treatment of eating disorders" would be a more appropriate title? FireflySixtySeven (talk) 03:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree with that definitely - preference would be "management of eating disorders" (as "management" better for long-term illnesses), but rationale would be if we couldn't fit all info on pages already. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed some references to "spirituality" sourced to a blog. I see not the least indication that blog had any editorial oversight; it is not a reliable source. Furthermore, this is an article on a medical topic; sources should comply with the stricter standards of WP:MEDRS. Also, the demon theory of disease has been out of favor with the medical community for a couple of centuries; claims of "spiritual" aspects would need exceptional sources. While I was at it I also removed a couple of completely unreferenced sections. Huon (talk) 20:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, I fail to see how whether or not mindful eating is a spiritual experience is relevant to recovery from eating disorders at all. The blog doesn't even mention recovery.

On an unrelated note, the page had copyright problems, and I removed an entire paragraph almost entirely copy-pasted from page 9, here. Huon (talk) 22:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eating recovery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071231165607/http://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychoanalysis/unit-staff/mentalization_bpd.htmtohttp://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychoanalysis/unit-staff/mentalization_bpd.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]