Article(edit | visual edit | history)·Article talk(edit | history)·Watch
I am nominating this article for Good Article reassessment for multiple reasons. One main issue is the "Episodes" section, consisting of only a link to the episodes in the series. It should be expended beyond that. Another issue is the sourcing issues the article has. From the Checklinks link shows dead links and such. Meanwhile, some unsourced material in the "Cast and crew" section, which may not unnecessary to begin with unless there's just a blurb of certain guest appearances on the show. Some refs aren't properly cited (3, 28, 32, 33, 44, 49) and I question the reliability of some of the sources (32, 33, 39, 41, 42, 44, 48).
I also feel that the article is a bit outdated. For example, it mentions that they filmed a pilot for G4, which is disestablished. Was there any followup on that? The "History" section just seems to end after 2012, not mentioning beyond that year.
Lots of things have happened in between the time the article was promoted so I don't expect this to be taken care of immediately so I can wait more than the usual week before making a decision. GamerPro64 01:32, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I came here because of a notice published to Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink. I spot checked around - consider the income section. Currently this section has 10 references. 8 of them are to the show itself, so are WP:SPS. One is to the Google store for their app, and one is to a promotional blog. At first look, this entire section is without any WP:RS and should all be deleted unless better sourcing is provided. If the rest of the article has similar problems then this should not be a WP:GA. Blue Rasberry (talk) 02:06, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm here from Wikipedia:WikiProject Internet Culture and looking back at the GA nomination i think that the article has expanded since then. Although i do have an issue with the Episode section; i think it looks ugly. --RetΔrtist (разговор) 04:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@GorillaWarfare: Its been a week since the nomination started. Have you any interest in fixing the article? At its current position, there seems to be consensus to demote. GamerPro64 21:35, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I don't have the time (or the interest, honestly) currently to devote to fixing the article; I understand if it's demoted as a result, though as always would welcome any hands on it. GorillaWarfare(talk) 21:50, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All right then. With an extra week having come and gone, I will now Demote this article of its Good Article status. Thank you everyone for their input. GamerPro64 00:36, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
