This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Why is this headline frequently reverted to "Sanctions Tool against Russia"? "Sanctions Tool" is quite ambiguous IMO, while "suspension of new projects" or the like is both more NPOV and more descriptive. The decision to suspend new projects could after all be interpreted in different ways. I would like more opinions on this instead of a low-intense edit-war which isn't helping anyone. Best, Yakikaki (talk) 19:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Sanctions Tool" is also horrible writing. "Suspension of new projects" is much better, though of course the reason for it should be explained in the para.Volunteer Marek (talk) 20:47, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Sanctions Tool" is such Russian propaganda. lol. "Tool" to do what? It sounds like the Russian conspiracy theory that the western world is out to get them. Plus, as Volunteer Marek said, its bad English. But I think the current section title can also be improved because it sounds awkward and it is pretty long to read. I think something like "2014 Sanctions on Russia" or "Decreased cooperation with Russia in 2014" or "2014 Response to Russian aggression".--BoguSlav03:00, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to one external link on European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified one external link on European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
To whom it may concern, I am the photo editor and photographer at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. I have been in contact with Wikipedia regarding uploading some photos of the banks Headquarters to this page. I will be posting them on this page within the next few days. If anyone has any concerns or questions please contact me EBRDphoto (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
EBRDphoto thank you for this note. Before you make these edits, please read the Conflict of interest and paid editing guidelines and be careful to abide by them (including making a clear declaration on your user page). I assume by "posting on this page" you do not mean adding them to the article but rather making an edit request here on the talk page. Thank you Melcous (talk) 13:09, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info Melcous. My employer is indeed the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, however I dont want to make any changes to the text or information. I simply want to upload some pictures of the Headquarters, in the spirit of Wikimedia, that people can use free of charge. If I am not allowed to upload these pictures perhaps you would be willing to this? The link to the photos is here:
Mention should be made in the first paragraph of the French name & acronym - 'Banque européenne pour la reconstruction et le développement (BERD)'. After all it did start at a meeting in Paris - and many international NGOs were referring to it as BERD at that time. 114.77.121.140 (talk) 12:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
