 | Eurovision Song Contest 1991 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Afact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 2, 2024.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Eurovision Song Contest 1991 was moved to Rome from Sanremo at a late stage due to increased security concerns resulting from the Gulf War?
| |||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
i) Sometime after this contest the tie-break rules changed and the first breaker became the number of countries that voted for the tied songs (and only after that, if necessary, the number of '12's (etc). This new rule would have given this contest to France (18 countries voted), and not Sweden (17 countries voted).
ii) There appears to have been some problem with Carola's performance (ultimate winner), with a dismissed suggestion that their performance should have been repeated ? (Sound system problem maybe ? Anyone know ?) Archzog 12:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Did the sound break during Carola's first or second performance? Andreyyshore (talk) 23:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ireland and the UK were tied at 10th. Shouldn't the article be changed to Ireland 11th, UK 10th, because the UK got a ten while Ireland didn't. 09:02, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
|
|
| Reviewing |
|
|
Nominator: Sims2aholic8 (talk · contribs) 16:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 02:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I'll complete an initial review by the end of this week. -Riley1012 (talk) 02:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
|
1. Well-written
2. Verifiable
Copyvio check is fine- the similarities noted are just the exact song titles and artists names. The sources used in this article are reliable. AGF on offline and non-translatable sources.
3. Broad
The article is broad and focused on the coverage of the event.
4. Neutral
The article is neutral on the coverage of the event.
5. Stable
This article is stable day-to-day.
6. Illustrated
The images in the article are free and have relevant captions.
@Sims2aholic8: Well done. Just a few minor changes are needed. -Riley1012 (talk) 15:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result was: promotedbyLaunchballer talk 10:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
)
Improved to Good Article status by Sims2aholic8 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Sims2aholic8 (talk) 21:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Date (recent GA status), size, QPQ, hooks (both), copyvio spotcheck, refs, etc. all GTG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
