| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the G-suit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.
Though the company is partly swiss owned, the suit was developed in Germany. The recent edit does not agree with http://www.autofluglibelle.com/html/history.html Kowloonese 09:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wasnt the RCAF suit liquid filled as well? CLOWNDEACAN
Ex nihil 08:49, 20 June 2006 (UTC) Yes it was, and the first RAF suit in WW2 was water filled. The comment on compressed air needs to be corrected. I am not aware of a compressed air suit and I cannot imagine how it would work. Are we confused here with space suits?[reply]
Ex nihil 09:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC) I have made some fairly drastic surgery on this as much of it was just not right. I still have doubts about the space suit bit at the bottom but have not had time to research this one. Perhaps you would like to?? Do astronauts wear g-suits, my understanding was they didn't, just vacuum suits and they got around the g-force by reclining the seats. Maybe they did later on.[reply]
There is some ambiguity regarding blackout and g-LOC being the same. In the introduction, blackout and G-LOC are mentioned seprately; implying that they are not nessarily the same. But the last paragraph of the 'Design' section reffers to them as the same thing. Please clarify. Sun1011101 (talk) 17:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done someone fixed it? --Kubanczyk (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should include the libelle or dragonfly water based G suit in the wiki article. AFAIK its almost the same as the red bull g suit and it has the potential to outperform the stadard USAF compressed air G suit.
The force of gravity on the earths surface is measured with a relative unit called g. G is the Gravitational Constant, an entirely different animal used in Astronomy and Astro-Physics.
The plural of gisg - NO S!!!Petebutt (talk) 00:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why was this article renamed from G-suit to "g"-suit without any prior discussion here? A lower-case g with quotes around it looks awfull! /130.237.216.122 (talk) 14:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on G-suit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on G-suit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
