Contents

Talk:Gulfstream III

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gulfstream III article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project. Military history: Aviation / North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force North American military history task force United States military history task force United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article was tagged by WikiProject Aircraft as needing to be brought up to snuff. If the old spec sheet should need to be replaced, it is below. thadius856_talk 05:26, 20 October 2006 (UTC) I am commenting it out to save screen real estate. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

C-20 Gulfstream → Gulfstream III — use as basis for article covering all variants, similar to the work done on North American Sabreliner —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the debate was that the page was moved as per request

Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

1. Support as nom. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2. Support As nominated. - BillCJ 20:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

I hate to get political here, but which version of the C-20 is it that the Democrats (Pelosi) claim has a range of 2,000 miles? Every version I see has a range of well over 4,000 miles.

This article lists the C-20C as a "C-20B with upgraded and "hardened" secure communications, often utilized as backup aircraft accompanying the VC-25A aircraft when it is operating as Air Force One." The 89th Airlift Wing lists only C-20Bs in it's inventory, and if anyone were to have a backup aircraft accompanying Air Force One, it would be them, wouldn't it? How good is the info on the C-20C? TCav (talk) 01:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gulfstream III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120529192238/http://www.af.mil/information/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=87tohttp://www.af.mil/information/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=87

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gulfstream III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110915024211/http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/aircraft/G-III_UAVSAR/index.htmltohttp://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/aircraft/G-III_UAVSAR/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]