Contents

Talk:H5N1 vaccine clinical trials

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Viruses Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Current Status of H5N1 Candidate Vaccines needs updating

[edit]

This section seems to have been written in 2007 and to now be very out of date - especially given its claim to be the current status. Rod57 (talk) 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Article seems to only mention vaccine trials, and should clarify if it will also cover antiviral trials. Once trials lead to an approval presumably the relevant content would be moved elsewhere ?

Would it be better to split the content into existing or new articles ? Influenza, Influenza vaccine#H5N1 Pandemic flu vaccine Avian flu ? Rod57 (talk) 11:22, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why list all the individual studies with their purpose - there will be hundreds. Far more useful would be to list any that provided notable results ? Rod57 (talk) 00:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote everything I knew about the subject when I wrote it. I'm trying to edit less and less and move onto some new hobby (yet to be chosen). Originally, when I saw your interest in H5N1 I almost said "feel free to take the lead on H5N1" but I have been disappointed in your expertise and wiki writing skills. None-the-less I'm not gonna update these H5N1 pages and it is better that they be updated poorly than not at all. I recommend that if you chose to take on the H5N1 suite of articles that you collaborate with others - if you can find anyone willing to help out. Good luck. This won't be my last message to you as I will be back on occasion; But pretend it is my last message to you and act accordingly. I'm trying to mostly leave! WAS 4.250 (talk) 22:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on H5N1 clinical trials. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080229072902/http://www.acambis.com/tohttp://www.acambis.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]