| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of general anesthesia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
 | A fact from History of general anesthesia appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 September 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
no archives yet (create) |
NPOV does not consist in looking to find specific eras when advances in one culture outstripped another. Such comparisons are inherently arbitrary in scope, and driven by editorial agendas. You wouldn't randomly say that while the Chinese had opium, the Danes were stuck with akvavit, and the Australian Aborigines roughed it. Why, exactly, is it necessary to point out that during one specific time the Arabs were ahead of the Europeans? They were also ahead of the Subsaharan Africans and the Tierra del Fuegans, Why is their status relative to Europeans inherently noteworthy? Are Europeans so important that no value judgments are worth making except in comparison to them? It's a bizarrely reverse-racist agenda that elevates Europeans to iconic status. I suggest we stick to simply stating the verifiable facts of innovations, and leave selective comparisons of the stagnation of ethnicity A versus the glory of culture B out of it.μηδείς (talk) 06:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Attempts at producing a state of general anesthesia can be traced throughout recorded history in the writings of the ancient Sumerians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Indians, and Chinese. The European Middle Ages coincided with the Islamic Golden Age, a time when medieval Islamic science flourished. While alchemists like Paracelsus made advances in Europe, Islamic physicians and other Eastern scholars maintained and advanced the practice of medicine in the Arab World during that period.
With respect to your minor complaint: your edit removed the Babylonians and Assyrians, as if their contributions were irrelevant. Although the written records from that time are admittedly a bit sketchy, there seems to be reasonable evidence to suggest that these civilizations transferred the knowledge of the medicinal properties of opium from the Sumerians to the Egyptians and the Persians. I believe the Babylonians and Assyrians should be given credit, even if their only contribution was to preserve knowledge rather than make specific scientific advances.
With respect to your main complaint, that I might be looking to find specific eras when advances in one culture outstripped another: first let me reiterate that I have no editorial agenda, other than to be accurate and thorough. I have no interest whatsoever in portraying the development of anesthesia as some sort of race between imagined competitor cultures. Rather, I am interested in trying to illustrate who was making advances that would prove to be instrumental to the development of general anesthesia, and where these advances were being made. What I am trying to say here is that many civilizations have participated in the development of general anesthesia, right up until the present. I am stunned that anyone could read any sort of reverse-racist agenda into this. Apparently my writing skills are even worse than I thought. During the Middle Ages, the only important written records I am aware of that relate to anesthesia/analgesia/surgery are from Europe, India, China, and the Arab World. There may indeed be records from other civilizations, but I have not yet seen them. If I find them, you can be sure that I will include them and (to the best of my ability) put them into the proper historical perspective. DiverDave (talk) 05:16, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article mentions opium a bunch of times, but mostly just mentioning who discovered opium when. It does not really explain how opium was used. I am interested in how well it can be used as a general anesthetic, and how well they were able to use it. The only account of opium consumption (recreational) I have heard was about being unable to move, but still conscious. I wonder if opium could actually render people unconscious, or if it was just used to make people limp when operating?
Was it safe to use opium, or did overdose often happen?
213.165.179.229 (talk) 12:20, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
An image used in this article, File:IbnSina-Dushanbe.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:IbnSina-Dushanbe.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:34, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
The original text talked about dwale being so dangerous it most often killed its recepients. This is contrary to what is stated in the text used as a source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1127089/ and is likely either vandalism or deliberate misrepresentation. Removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.196.205.99 (talk) 11:30, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of general anesthesia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on History of general anesthesia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}} tag to http://www.jivaka.net/%20Salguero%20HR%20Medicine%20King.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of general anesthesia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I created an article to Andranik Ovassapian. He is cited in this article. I'm not sure how to add an author link. TJMSmith (talk) 17:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
